Suppr超能文献

体力要求高的工作是否会阻碍低社会经济地位工人的积极生活方式?基于加速度计数据的组合数据分析。

Does Physically Demanding Work Hinder a Physically Active Lifestyle in Low Socioeconomic Workers? A Compositional Data Analysis Based on Accelerometer Data.

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 21;15(7):1306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071306.

Abstract

Leisure time physical activity (LTPA) is strongly associated with socioeconomic position (SEP). Few studies have investigated if demanding occupational physical activity (OPA) could impede a physically active lifestyle in low SEP groups. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between OPA and LTPA among low SEP men and women. We used cross-sectional data from 895 low SEP workers who wore accelerometers for 1⁻5 consecutive workdays. The associations between the relative importance of activities performed during work and leisure time were assessed using compositional regression models stratified on sex. Compositional isotemporal substitution models were used to assess the implication of increasing occupational walking, standing, or sitting on LTPA. We found dissimilarity in LTPA between the sexes, with men spending more waking leisure time sedentary than women (men ~67%, women ~61%), suggesting women performed more household tasks. In men, the associations between OPA and LTPA were weak. In women, the strongest association was observed between the relative importance of occupational walking and leisure time standing (β = -0.16; = 0.01), where reallocating 15 min work time to occupational walking showed an expected decrease in leisure time standing of 7 min. If this time was spent on additional sedentary leisure time, it could have adverse health consequences.

摘要

闲暇时间体力活动(LTPA)与社会经济地位(SEP)密切相关。很少有研究调查过繁重的职业体力活动(OPA)是否会阻碍低 SEP 群体形成积极的生活方式。本研究旨在调查低 SEP 男性和女性中 OPA 与 LTPA 之间的关系。我们使用了 895 名低 SEP 工人的横断面数据,这些工人在 1⁻5 个连续工作日佩戴了加速度计。使用基于性别的成分回归模型评估了工作和闲暇时间进行的活动的相对重要性之间的关联。使用成分等时替代模型来评估增加职业步行、站立或坐着对 LTPA 的影响。我们发现男女之间的 LTPA 存在差异,男性在清醒的闲暇时间中坐着的时间比女性多(男性约 67%,女性约 61%),这表明女性承担了更多的家务劳动。在男性中,OPA 和 LTPA 之间的关联较弱。在女性中,观察到职业步行和闲暇时间站立之间的相对重要性之间的最强关联(β=-0.16; = 0.01),其中将 15 分钟的工作时间重新分配给职业步行,预计会减少 7 分钟的闲暇时间站立。如果这段时间用于额外的久坐式休闲时间,可能会对健康产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ca/6068990/5a4237f82cef/ijerph-15-01306-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验