Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Jan 18;26:e20160662. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0662.
The main goal of this study was to compare the polymerization degree of bulk-fill giomer resin cured with three different light-curing units (LCUs): a polywave third-generation (Valo); a monowave (DemiUltra: DU); and a second-generation LED (Optima 10: Opt) LCUs by using structural and mechanical properties. Giomer samples of 2 and 4 mm cured with three LCUs were employed in vitro analysis. The degree of curing (DC%) was determined with Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Microstructural features were observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Flexural strength (FS), compression strength (CS), elastic modulus and fracturing strain were determined for mechanical properties. Surface microhardness (SMH) values were also measured. Oneway ANOVA, two-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison tests were used for statistically analyzing the FS and SMH. DC% values were 58.2, 47.6, and 39.7 for the 2 mm samples cured with DU, Opt., and Valo LCUs, respectively. DC% values of the 4 mm samples were 50.4, 44.6, and 38.2 for DU, Opt, and Valo, respectively. SMH values were Valo, Opt<DU at top of the samples; Valo<DU, Opt at 2 mm, and DU, Valo<Opt at 4 mm depth. Giomer samples cured with Opt and DU exhibited higher FS values than Valo. CS values were similar but compressive modulus and fracturing strain (%) varied depending on the curing protocol. Based on the results, it can be concluded that curing device and protocol strongly affect crosslinking reactions and thus DC%, SMH, compressive modulus and strain at break values. Consequently, it can be deduced that curing protocol is possibly the most important parameter for microstructure formation of highly-filled composite restoratives because it may bring some structural defects and physical frailties on restorations due to lower degree of polymerization.
本研究的主要目的是比较三种不同光固化单元(LCU)聚合度的块状充填玻璃离子树脂:第三代多波长(Valo);单波长(DemiUltra:DU);第二代 LED(Optima 10:Opt)LCU,采用结构和力学性能。体外分析采用三种 LCU 固化的 2mm 和 4mm 厚的玻璃离子树脂样本。用傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)测定固化程度(DC%)。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察微观结构特征。对弯曲强度(FS)、压缩强度(CS)、弹性模量和断裂应变进行力学性能测定。表面显微硬度(SMH)值也进行了测量。用单因素方差分析、双因素方差分析和 Tukey 多重比较检验对 FS 和 SMH 进行统计学分析。DU、Opt. 和 Valo LCU 固化的 2mm 厚样本的 DC%值分别为 58.2、47.6 和 39.7。DU、Opt. 和 Valo LCU 固化的 4mm 厚样本的 DC%值分别为 50.4、44.6 和 38.2。SMH 值在样本顶部表现为 Valo、Opt<DU;在 2mm 处表现为 Valo<DU、Opt;在 4mm 深度处表现为 DU、Valo<Opt。用 Opt. 和 DU 固化的玻璃离子树脂样本的 FS 值高于 Valo。CS 值相似,但压缩模量和断裂应变(%)值因固化方案而异。基于这些结果,可以得出结论,固化设备和方案强烈影响交联反应,从而影响 DC%、SMH、压缩模量和断裂应变值。因此,可以推断出固化方案可能是高度填充复合修复体微观结构形成的最重要参数,因为它可能会由于聚合度较低而在修复体上产生一些结构缺陷和物理缺陷。