• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How thinking about groups is different from groupthink.

作者信息

Hautz Wolf E, Kämmer Juliane E, Exadaktylos Aristomenis, Hautz Stefanie C

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2017 Feb;51(2):229. doi: 10.1111/medu.13137. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1111/medu.13137
PMID:27859482
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
How thinking about groups is different from groupthink.思考群体的方式与群体思维有何不同。
Med Educ. 2017 Feb;51(2):229. doi: 10.1111/medu.13137. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
2
"Bipolar groupthink": assessing groupthink tendencies in authentic work groups.“双相群体思维”：评估真实工作群体中的群体思维倾向
Scand J Psychol. 1998 Jun;39(2):81-92. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00060.
3
The diagnosis and treatment of "groupthink".“群体思维”的诊断与治疗。
Va Med. 1980 Mar;107(3):231-4.
4
Groupthink and caregivers' projections: addressing barriers to empathy.群体思维与照顾者的投射：解决同理心障碍
J Clin Ethics. 2009 Spring;20(1):75-8.
5
Difficult patients, overmedication, and groupthink.难缠的患者、用药过量与群体思维。
J Clin Ethics. 2009 Spring;20(1):64-74.
6
Bion's thinking about groups: a study of influence and originality.比昂对群体的思考：影响力与原创性研究
Psychoanal Q. 2015 Apr;84(2):415-40. doi: 10.1002/psaq.12007.
7
Groupthink.群体思维
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Dec;35(12):1065-1066. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30753-2.
8
Groupthink: when too many heads spoil the decision.群体思维：当太多人参与决策反而坏事时。
Manage Rev. 1978 Mar;67(3):44-9.
9
Groupthink: How Should Clinicians Respond to Human Trafficking?群体思维：临床医生应如何应对人口贩卖问题？
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):91-97. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.msoc3-1701.
10
Thinking styles and individualism. The problem of human autonomy.思维方式与个人主义。人类自主性问题。
Bull Menninger Clin. 1969 May;33(3):133-45.

引用本文的文献

1
An observational study of self-monitoring in ad hoc health care teams.临时医疗团队自我监测的观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02115-3.
2
Whether two heads are better than one is the wrong question (though sometimes they are).两个脑袋是否比一个脑袋强，这是个错误的问题（尽管有时确实如此）。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Oct;25(4):905-911. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-09956-z. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
3
Diagnostic error increases mortality and length of hospital stay in patients presenting through the emergency room.
诊断错误会增加通过急诊就诊的患者的死亡率和住院时间。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 May 8;27(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0629-z.
4
Patient safety culture in a university hospital emergency department in Switzerland - a survey study.瑞士一家大学医院急诊科的患者安全文化——一项调查研究。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Mar 15;36(2):Doc14. doi: 10.3205/zma001222. eCollection 2019.
5
Development, implementation and first insights of a time- and location-independent longitudinal postgraduate curriculum in emergency medicine.急诊医学中一个与时间和地点无关的纵向研究生课程的开发、实施及初步见解。
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 Nov 15;35(4):Doc44. doi: 10.3205/zma001190. eCollection 2018.
6
Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review.沟通与患者交接工具SBAR对患者安全的影响：一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):e022202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202.
7
Interprofessional Emergency Training Leads to Changes in the Workplace.跨专业应急培训导致工作场所的变化。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;19(1):185-192. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.11.35275. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Professionalisation rather than monopolisation is the future of emergency medicine in Europe.专业化而非垄断化才是欧洲急诊医学的未来。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Mar;35(3):234-235. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000744.
9
Now you see me: a pragmatic cohort study comparing first and final radiological diagnoses in the emergency department.现在你看到我了：一项比较急诊科首次和最终影像学诊断的实用性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 13;8(1):e020230. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020230.
10
Improving patient safety through better teamwork: how effective are different methods of simulation debriefing? Protocol for a pragmatic, prospective and randomised study.通过改善团队协作提高患者安全：不同模拟总结方法的效果如何？一项实用、前瞻性随机研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e015977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015977.