Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 30;37(9):1550-1561. doi: 10.1002/sim.7609. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Motivated by the setting of clinical trials in low back pain, this work investigated statistical methods to identify patient subgroups for which there is a large treatment effect (treatment by subgroup interaction). Statistical tests for interaction are often underpowered. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses provide a framework with improved statistical power to investigate subgroups. However, conventional approaches to subgroup analyses applied in both a single trial setting and an IPD setting have a number of issues, one of them being that factors used to define subgroups are investigated one at a time. As individuals have multiple characteristics that may be related to response to treatment, alternative exploratory statistical methods are required.
Tree-based methods are a promising alternative that systematically searches the covariate space to identify subgroups defined by multiple characteristics. A tree method in particular, SIDES, is described and extended for application in an IPD meta-analyses setting by incorporating fixed-effects and random-effects models to account for between-trial variation. The performance of the proposed extension was assessed using simulation studies. The proposed method was then applied to an IPD low back pain dataset.
The simulation studies found that the extended IPD-SIDES method performed well in detecting subgroups especially in the presence of large between-trial variation. The IPD-SIDES method identified subgroups with enhanced treatment effect when applied to the low back pain data.
This work proposes an exploratory statistical approach for subgroup analyses applicable in any research discipline where subgroup analyses in an IPD meta-analysis setting are of interest.
受临床试验中腰痛设定的启发,本研究旨在探讨用于识别存在较大治疗效果(治疗与亚组相互作用)的患者亚组的统计方法。交互作用的统计检验通常功效不足。个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析提供了一种具有改进统计功效的框架,用于研究亚组。然而,在单一试验设置和 IPD 设置中应用的常规亚组分析方法存在许多问题,其中之一是用于定义亚组的因素是一次一个地进行研究。由于个体具有多个可能与治疗反应相关的特征,因此需要替代探索性统计方法。
树状方法是一种很有前途的替代方法,它可以系统地搜索协变量空间,以确定由多个特征定义的亚组。特别是一种名为 SIDES 的树方法,被描述并扩展用于 IPD 荟萃分析设置,通过合并固定效应和随机效应模型来考虑试验间的变异性。使用模拟研究评估了所提出的扩展的性能。然后将所提出的方法应用于 IPD 腰痛数据集。
模拟研究发现,扩展的 IPD-SIDES 方法在检测亚组方面表现良好,特别是在存在较大试验间变异性的情况下。当应用于腰痛数据时,IPD-SIDES 方法确定了具有增强治疗效果的亚组。
本研究提出了一种探索性统计方法,适用于任何研究领域,其中 IPD 荟萃分析设置中的亚组分析很有意义。