• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性交互树:一种用于识别定性治疗亚组交互作用的工具。

Qualitative interaction trees: a tool to identify qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions.

机构信息

Statistics Group, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Wassenaarseweg 56, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 - bus 3713, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2014 Jan 30;33(2):219-37. doi: 10.1002/sim.5933. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1002/sim.5933
PMID:23922224
Abstract

When two alternative treatments (A and B) are available, some subgroup of patients may display a better outcome with treatment A than with B, whereas for another subgroup, the reverse may be true. If this is the case, a qualitative (i.e., disordinal) treatment-subgroup interaction is present. Such interactions imply that some subgroups of patients should be treated differently and are therefore most relevant for personalized medicine. In case of data from randomized clinical trials with many patient characteristics that could interact with treatment in a complex way, a suitable statistical approach to detect qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions is not yet available. As a way out, in the present paper, we propose a new method for this purpose, called QUalitative INteraction Trees (QUINT). QUINT results in a binary tree that subdivides the patients into terminal nodes on the basis of patient characteristics; these nodes are further assigned to one of three classes: a first for which A is better than B, a second for which B is better than A, and an optional third for which type of treatment makes no difference. Results of QUINT on simulated data showed satisfactory performance, with regard to optimization and recovery. Results of an application to real data suggested that, compared with other approaches, QUINT provided a more pronounced picture of the qualitative interactions that are present in the data.

摘要

当有两种可供选择的治疗方法(A 和 B)时,某些亚组患者可能会对 A 治疗的效果优于 B,而对另一些亚组患者来说,情况可能正好相反。如果是这样,就存在定性(即无序)的治疗亚组相互作用。这种相互作用意味着某些亚组患者应该接受不同的治疗,因此最适合个性化医疗。在随机临床试验数据中,如果有许多可能以复杂方式与治疗相互作用的患者特征,那么目前还没有一种合适的统计方法来检测定性的治疗亚组相互作用。作为一种解决方案,在本文中,我们为此提出了一种新方法,称为 QUalitative INteraction Trees(QUINT)。QUINT 生成一个二叉树,根据患者特征将患者细分为终端节点;这些节点进一步被分配到三个类别之一:第一个类别表示 A 优于 B,第二个类别表示 B 优于 A,第三个类别表示治疗类型没有区别。QUINT 在模拟数据上的结果表现出令人满意的优化和恢复性能。对实际数据的应用结果表明,与其他方法相比,QUINT 更能清晰地描绘出数据中存在的定性相互作用。

相似文献

1
Qualitative interaction trees: a tool to identify qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions.定性交互树:一种用于识别定性治疗亚组交互作用的工具。
Stat Med. 2014 Jan 30;33(2):219-37. doi: 10.1002/sim.5933. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
2
QUINT: A tool to detect qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions in randomized controlled trials.QUINT:一种用于在随机对照试验中检测定性治疗亚组相互作用的工具。
Psychother Res. 2016 Sep;26(5):612-22. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1062934. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
3
Quint: An R package for the identification of subgroups of clients who differ in which treatment alternative is best for them.Quint:一个用于识别在何种治疗方案对他们最为合适方面存在差异的客户亚组的R软件包。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Jun;48(2):650-63. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0594-z.
4
Beyond subgroup analysis: improving the clinical interpretation of treatment effects in stroke research.超越亚组分析:改善中风研究中治疗效果的临床解读
J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Apr 30;143(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.002. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
5
Detecting treatment-subgroup interactions in clustered data with generalized linear mixed-effects model trees.基于广义线性混合效应模型树检测聚类数据中的治疗亚组交互作用。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):2016-2034. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0971-x.
6
Bayesian additive decision trees of biomarker by treatment interactions for predictive biomarker detection and subgroup identification.用于预测生物标志物检测和亚组识别的基于治疗相互作用的生物标志物贝叶斯加法决策树。
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(3):534-549. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1372770. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test.随机试验中的亚组分析:亚组特异性分析的风险;交互作用检验的效能和样本量
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Mar;57(3):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.009.
8
Subgroup identification based on differential effect search--a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations.基于差异效应搜索的亚组识别——一种递归分区方法,用于建立患者亚组对治疗的反应。
Stat Med. 2011 Sep 20;30(21):2601-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.4289. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
9
Identifying representative trees from ensembles.从集合中识别代表性树木。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1601-16. doi: 10.1002/sim.4492. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
10
Evidence of subgroup-specific treatment effect in the absence of an overall effect: is there really a contradiction?亚组特异性治疗效果的证据而缺乏总体效果:真的存在矛盾吗?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):1178-88. doi: 10.1002/pds.3485. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying responders to gabapentin for the treatment of alcohol use disorder: an exploratory machine learning approach.识别加巴喷丁治疗酒精使用障碍的反应者:一种探索性机器学习方法。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2025 Mar 25;60(3). doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaf010.
2
Generalized framework for identifying meaningful heterogenous treatment effects in observational studies: A parametric data-adaptive G-computation approach.观察性研究中识别有意义的异质性治疗效果的通用框架:一种参数化数据自适应G计算方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):648-662. doi: 10.1177/09622802251316969. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
3
Regression Trees With Fused Leaves.
带融合叶的回归树
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5872-5884. doi: 10.1002/sim.10272. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
4
An Approach for Combining Clinical Judgment with Machine Learning to Inform Medical Decision Making: Analysis of Nonemergency Surgery Strategies for Acute Appendicitis in Patients with Multiple Long-Term Conditions.一种结合临床判断与机器学习以辅助医疗决策的方法:对伴有多种长期疾病的急性阑尾炎患者的非紧急手术策略的分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Nov;44(8):944-960. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241289336. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
5
Statistical inference on qualitative differences in the magnitude of an effect.关于效应大小质性差异的统计推断。
Stat Med. 2024 Mar 30;43(7):1419-1440. doi: 10.1002/sim.10025. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
Detecting heterogeneity in the causal direction of dependence: A model-based recursive partitioning approach.检测依赖因果方向中的异质性:一种基于模型的递归划分方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):2711-2730. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02253-8. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Blood Microbiota Profile Is Associated with the Responsiveness of Postprandial Lipemia to Beverage: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Subjects.血液微生物群特征与餐后血脂反应性有关:一项健康受试者的随机对照试验。
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 24;15(14):3267. doi: 10.3390/nu15143267.
8
Inference on subgroups identified based on a heterogeneous treatment effect in a post hoc analysis of a clinical trial.基于临床试验事后分析中异质治疗效果识别的亚组推断。
Clin Trials. 2023 Aug;20(4):370-379. doi: 10.1177/17407745231173055. Epub 2023 May 11.
9
Targeting resources efficiently and justifiably by combining causal machine learning and theory.通过结合因果机器学习和理论,高效且合理地分配资源。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Dec 7;5:1015604. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.1015604. eCollection 2022.
10
Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Elevated Body Mass Index in a Study Comparing Group Medical Visits Focused on Weight Management and Medication Intensification.在一项比较以体重管理和药物强化为重点的团体医疗就诊与单纯药物强化的疗效的研究中,2 型糖尿病和超重患者的治疗效果存在异质性。
Med Care. 2021 Nov 1;59(11):1031-1038. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001642.