Montero-Marín Jesús, Navarro-Gil Mayte, Puebla-Guedea Marta, Luciano Juan V, Van Gordon William, Shonin Edo, García-Campayo Javier
Primary Care Prevention and Health Promotion Research Network (RedIAPP), Zaragoza, Spain.
Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 16;8:307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00307. eCollection 2017.
There is a growing interest in evaluating the effectiveness of compassion interventions for treating psychological disorders. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of "attachment-based compassion therapy" (ABCT) in the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM), and the role of psychological flexibility as a mediator of improvements.
A total of 42 patients with FM were randomly assigned to ABCT or relaxation (active control group). Both the intervention and control condition were combined with treatment as usual (TAU). The primary outcome was functional status (FIQ), and the secondary outcomes were clinical severity (CGI-S), pain catastrophizing (PCS), anxiety (HADS-A), depression (HADS-D), quality of life (EQ-5D), and psychological flexibility (AAQ-II). Differences between the groups were estimated using mixed-effects models, and mediation assessments were conducted using path analyses.
The ABCT group demonstrated superior outcomes compared to the relaxation group, including better FIQ values after treatment ( = -3.01; = 0.003). Differences in FIQ were maintained at 3-month follow-up ( = -3.33; = 0.001). The absolute risk reduction in ABCT compared to relaxation increased by 40.0%, with an NNT = 3 based on criteria of ≥50% FIQ reduction after treatment. Psychological flexibility had a significant mediating effect on improvements.
These results suggest that ABCT combined with TAU appears to be effective in the treatment of FM symptoms.
http://ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02454244.
评估共情干预对治疗心理障碍有效性的兴趣与日俱增。本研究评估了“基于依恋的共情疗法”(ABCT)治疗纤维肌痛(FM)的有效性,以及心理灵活性作为改善效果中介因素的作用。
总共42名FM患者被随机分配至ABCT组或放松组(活性对照组)。干预组和对照组均结合常规治疗(TAU)。主要结局为功能状态(FIQ),次要结局为临床严重程度(CGI-S)、疼痛灾难化(PCS)、焦虑(HADS-A)、抑郁(HADS-D)、生活质量(EQ-5D)和心理灵活性(AAQ-II)。使用混合效应模型估计组间差异,并使用路径分析进行中介评估。
与放松组相比,ABCT组显示出更好的结局,包括治疗后更好的FIQ值(= -3.01;= 0.003)。FIQ的差异在3个月随访时仍然存在(= -3.33;= 0.001)。与放松组相比,ABCT组的绝对风险降低增加了40.0%,根据治疗后FIQ降低≥50%的标准,NNT = 3。心理灵活性对改善有显著的中介作用。
这些结果表明,ABCT联合TAU似乎对治疗FM症状有效。