Suppr超能文献

涎腺主要癌症总生存、癌症特异性生存及复发列线图的验证

Validation of nomograms for overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence in carcinoma of the major salivary glands.

作者信息

Hay Ashley, Migliacci Jocelyn, Zanoni Daniella Karassawa, Patel Snehal, Yu Changhong, Kattan Michael W, Ganly Ian

机构信息

Department of Surgery Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Department of Quantitative Health Services, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2018 May;40(5):1008-1015. doi: 10.1002/hed.25079. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center salivary carcinoma nomograms predicting overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence with an external validation dataset.

METHODS

The validation dataset comprised 123 patients treated between 2010 and 2015 at our institution. They were evaluated by assessing discrimination (concordance index [C-index]) and calibration (plotting predicted vs actual probabilities for quintiles).

RESULTS

The validation cohort (n = 123) showed some differences to the original cohort (n = 301). The validation cohort had less high-grade cancers (P = .006), less lymphovascular invasion (LVI; P < .001) and shorter follow-up of 19 months versus 45.6 months. Validation showed a C-index of 0.833 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.758-0.908), 0.807 (95% CI 0.717-0.898), and 0.844 (95% CI 0.768-0.920) for overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The 3 salivary gland nomograms performed well using a contemporary validation dataset, despite limitations related to sample size, follow-up, and differences in clinical and pathology characteristics between the original and validation cohorts.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过一个外部验证数据集来调查纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心唾液腺癌列线图预测总生存期、癌症特异性生存期和复发情况的性能。

方法

验证数据集包括2010年至2015年间在我们机构接受治疗的123例患者。通过评估区分度(一致性指数[C指数])和校准度(绘制五分位数的预测概率与实际概率)对他们进行评估。

结果

验证队列(n = 123)与原始队列(n = 301)存在一些差异。验证队列中高级别癌症较少(P = 0.006),淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)较少(P < 0.001),随访时间较短,分别为19个月和45.6个月。验证显示,总生存期、癌症特异性生存期和复发的C指数分别为0.833(95%置信区间[CI] 0.758 - 0.908)、0.807(95% CI 0.717 - 0.898)和0.844(95% CI 0.768 - 0.920)。

结论

尽管存在样本量、随访以及原始队列和验证队列之间临床和病理特征差异等局限性,但使用当代验证数据集时,这3个唾液腺列线图表现良好。

相似文献

3
Postoperative nomograms predictive of survival after surgical management of malignant tumors of the major salivary glands.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(2):637-42. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3321-y. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
4
A predictive nomogram for recurrence of carcinoma of the major salivary glands.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jul;139(7):698-705. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3347.
7
Prognostic nomogram for disease-specific survival of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary gland.
Head Neck. 2017 Dec;39(12):2416-2424. doi: 10.1002/hed.24908. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Establishment and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Endemic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Oct 14;108(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv291. Print 2016 Jan.
10
Validation of a Postoperative Nomogram Predicting Recurrence in Patients with Conventional Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jan;4(1):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term follow-up and prognostic analysis of parotid tumors in children and adolescents.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Jun 4;9(3):e1275. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1275. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Outcomes and prognostic factors of major salivary gland tumors treated with proton beam radiation therapy.
Head Neck. 2021 Apr;43(4):1056-1062. doi: 10.1002/hed.26563. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
New AJCC: How does it impact oral cancers?
Oral Oncol. 2020 May;104:104607. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104607. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
10
Primary parotid carcinoma: analysis of risk factors and validation of a prognostic index.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Nov;275(11):2829-2841. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5122-1. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

3
Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Salivary Gland Tumors of the Parotid Gland.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016 Apr;49(2):343-80. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.11.001.
4
Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye.
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):e173-80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71116-7.
5
Postoperative nomograms predictive of survival after surgical management of malignant tumors of the major salivary glands.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(2):637-42. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3321-y. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
6
A predictive nomogram for recurrence of carcinoma of the major salivary glands.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jul;139(7):698-705. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3347.
7
What is a real nomogram?
Semin Oncol. 2010 Feb;37(1):23-6. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.12.003.
8
How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis.
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1364-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9791.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验