Sauven P, Playforth M J, Smith G M, Evans M, Pollock A V
J R Soc Med. 1986 Mar;79(3):137-41. doi: 10.1177/014107688607900304.
A randomized controlled clinical trial was undertaken in 542 consecutive emergency and elective abdominal operations, with one group of patients receiving tetracycline peritoneal and wound lavage and the other a single intravenous injection of 1 g latamoxef at induction of anaesthesia. Seventy-five patients were withdrawn because no potentially contaminated hollow viscus was opened, and a further 36 because they could not be assessed for wound infection. Of the remaining 431 patients, 212 received latamoxef resulting in 5 major and 8 minor wound infections in hospital; another 4 minor infections occurred at home (total incidence 8.0%). In the tetracycline group (n = 219) there were 7 major and 19 minor wound infections in hospital and 10 minor infections later (total incidence 16.4%). This is significantly higher than the rate with latamoxef (P = 0.012). Monitoring of operative and postoperative bleeding revealed no evidence (except in one doubtful case) of excessive bleeding associated with the use of a single dose of latamoxef. It is concluded that single-dose preoperative latamoxef is more effective than peroperative tetracycline lavage for the prevention of wound infections after potentially contaminated abdominal operations.
对542例连续进行的急诊和择期腹部手术开展了一项随机对照临床试验,一组患者接受四环素腹腔和伤口灌洗,另一组在麻醉诱导时单次静脉注射1g拉氧头孢。75例患者因未打开可能受污染的中空脏器而退出研究,另有36例因无法评估伤口感染情况而退出。在其余431例患者中,212例接受了拉氧头孢治疗,住院期间出现5例严重伤口感染和8例轻微伤口感染;另外4例轻微感染发生在出院后(总发生率8.0%)。在四环素组(n = 219),住院期间有7例严重伤口感染和19例轻微伤口感染,之后又有10例轻微感染(总发生率16.4%)。这一发生率显著高于拉氧头孢组(P = 0.012)。对手术中和术后出血情况的监测显示,没有证据(除了1例可疑病例)表明单剂量拉氧头孢的使用会导致出血过多。研究得出结论,对于预防可能受污染的腹部手术后的伤口感染,术前单剂量拉氧头孢比术中四环素灌洗更有效。