The Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Br J Pharmacol. 2018 May;175(9):1377-1400. doi: 10.1111/bph.14155. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
In the infarcted heart, the damage-associated molecular pattern proteins released by necrotic cells trigger both myocardial and systemic inflammatory responses. Induction of chemokines and cytokines and up-regulation of endothelial adhesion molecules mediate leukocyte recruitment in the infarcted myocardium. Inflammatory cells clear the infarct of dead cells and matrix debris and activate repair by myofibroblasts and vascular cells, but may also contribute to adverse fibrotic remodelling of viable segments, accentuate cardiomyocyte apoptosis and exert arrhythmogenic actions. Excessive, prolonged and dysregulated inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of complications and may be involved in the development of heart failure following infarction. Studies in animal models of myocardial infarction (MI) have suggested the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions targeting the inflammatory response. This article provides a brief overview of the cell biology of the post-infarction inflammatory response and discusses the use of pharmacological interventions targeting inflammation following infarction. Therapy with broad anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory agents may also inhibit important repair pathways, thus exerting detrimental actions in patients with MI. Extensive experimental evidence suggests that targeting specific inflammatory signals, such as the complement cascade, chemokines, cytokines, proteases, selectins and leukocyte integrins, may hold promise. However, clinical translation has proved challenging. Targeting IL-1 may benefit patients with exaggerated post-MI inflammatory responses following infarction, not only by attenuating adverse remodelling but also by stabilizing the atherosclerotic plaque and by inhibiting arrhythmia generation. Identification of the therapeutic window for specific interventions and pathophysiological stratification of MI patients using inflammatory biomarkers and imaging strategies are critical for optimal therapeutic design.
在梗死的心脏中,坏死细胞释放的损伤相关分子模式蛋白会引发心肌和全身炎症反应。趋化因子和细胞因子的诱导以及内皮黏附分子的上调介导了白细胞在梗死心肌中的募集。炎症细胞清除梗死区的死亡细胞和基质碎片,并通过肌成纤维细胞和血管细胞激活修复,但也可能导致存活节段的不良纤维化重塑,加重心肌细胞凋亡,并发挥致心律失常作用。过度、持续和失调的炎症与并发症的发病机制有关,并且可能与梗死后心力衰竭的发展有关。心肌梗死(MI)动物模型的研究表明,针对炎症反应的药物干预措施具有有效性。本文简要概述了梗死后炎症反应的细胞生物学,并讨论了梗死后针对炎症的药物干预措施的应用。具有广泛抗炎和免疫调节作用的治疗方法也可能抑制重要的修复途径,从而对 MI 患者产生有害作用。大量实验证据表明,针对特定炎症信号(如补体级联、趋化因子、细胞因子、蛋白酶、选择素和白细胞整合素)的靶向治疗可能具有前景。然而,临床转化一直具有挑战性。针对白细胞介素-1(IL-1)的治疗可能有益于梗死后炎症反应过度的 MI 患者,不仅可以减轻不良重塑,还可以稳定动脉粥样硬化斑块并抑制心律失常的发生。确定特定干预措施的治疗窗口,并使用炎症生物标志物和成像策略对 MI 患者进行病理生理分层,对于优化治疗设计至关重要。