• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人健康结局测量标准集。

Standard set of health outcome measures for older persons.

机构信息

Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.

International Consortium on Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2018 Feb 2;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0701-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-017-0701-3
PMID:
29394887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5797357/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) was founded in 2012 to propose consensus-based measurement tools and documentation for different conditions and populations.This article describes how the ICHOM Older Person Working Group followed a consensus-driven modified Delphi technique to develop multiple global outcome measures in older persons. The standard set of outcome measures developed by this group will support the ability of healthcare systems to improve their care pathways and quality of care. An additional benefit will be the opportunity to compare variations in outcomes which encourages and supports learning between different health care systems that drives quality improvement. These outcome measures were not developed for use in research. They are aimed at non researchers in healthcare provision and those who pay for these services.

METHODS

A modified Delphi technique utilising a value based healthcare framework was applied by an international panel to arrive at consensus decisions.To inform the panel meetings, information was sought from literature reviews, longitudinal ageing surveys and a focus group.

RESULTS

The outcome measures developed and recommended were participation in decision making, autonomy and control, mood and emotional health, loneliness and isolation, pain, activities of daily living, frailty, time spent in hospital, overall survival, carer burden, polypharmacy, falls and place of death mapped to a three tier value based healthcare framework.

CONCLUSIONS

The first global health standard set of outcome measures in older persons has been developed to enable health care systems improve the quality of care provided to older persons.

摘要

背景

国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM)成立于 2012 年,旨在为不同的病症和人群提出基于共识的测量工具和文档。本文描述了 ICHOM 老年人工作组如何遵循共识驱动的改良 Delphi 技术,为老年人制定多个全球结局测量工具。该工作组制定的标准结局测量工具套件将支持医疗保健系统改善其护理路径和护理质量。额外的好处是有机会比较结果的差异,这鼓励和支持不同医疗保健系统之间的学习,推动质量改进。这些结局测量工具不是为研究而开发的。它们针对的是医疗保健服务提供非研究人员以及为这些服务付费的人员。

方法

一个国际小组利用基于价值的医疗保健框架应用改良 Delphi 技术达成共识决策。为了为小组会议提供信息,从文献综述、纵向老龄化调查和焦点小组中寻求信息。

结果

制定和推荐的结局测量工具包括参与决策、自主和控制、情绪和心理健康、孤独和隔离、疼痛、日常生活活动、脆弱性、住院时间、总生存、照顾者负担、多种药物治疗、跌倒和死亡地点,映射到基于价值的三层医疗保健框架。

结论

为了使医疗保健系统能够改善对老年人的护理质量,已经制定了第一套全球老年人健康标准结局测量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/5797357/451f737dddb6/12877_2017_701_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/5797357/451f737dddb6/12877_2017_701_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/5797357/451f737dddb6/12877_2017_701_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Standard set of health outcome measures for older persons.老年人健康结局测量标准集。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Feb 2;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0701-3.
2
First insights on value-based healthcare of elders using ICHOM older person standard set reporting.利用 ICHOM 老年人标准集报告了解老年人基于价值的医疗保健的初步见解。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 9;20(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01734-1.
3
An international Delphi consensus process to determine a common data element and core outcome set for frailty: FOCUS (The Frailty Outcomes Consensus Project).一项旨在确定衰弱的通用数据元素和核心结局集的国际 Delphi 共识过程:FOCUS(衰弱结局共识项目)。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02993-w.
4
A standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive assessment of osteogenesis imperfecta.用于成骨不全症综合评估的标准成套结局测量指标。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Mar 20;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01682-y.
5
Development of an International Standard Set of Outcomes and Measurement Methods for Routine Practice for Infants, Children, and Adolescents with Epilepsy: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Consensus Recommendations.制定国际标准的癫痫患儿常规实践结局指标及测评方法集:国际健康结局测评联盟共识推荐意见
Epilepsia. 2024 Jul;65(7):1938-1961. doi: 10.1111/epi.17976. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Development of an International Standard Set of Value-Based Outcome Measures for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) CKD Working Group.开发一套基于价值的国际慢性肾脏病患者结局测量标准集:国际健康结局测量联盟(ICHOM)慢性肾脏病工作组的报告。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Mar;73(3):372-384. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
7
International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Set of Outcomes That Matter to People Living With Inflammatory Arthritis: Consensus From an International Working Group.国际健康结局测量联合会炎症性关节炎患者关心的结局指标集:国际工作组的共识。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;71(12):1556-1565. doi: 10.1002/acr.23799.
8
A Standard Set for Outcome Measurement in Patients With Hand and Wrist Conditions: Consensus by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hand and Wrist Working Group.手部和腕部疾病患者结局测量的标准集:国际健康结局测量联合会手部和腕部工作组的共识。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Oct;46(10):841-855.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
Development of a core set of outcome measures for OAB treatment.膀胱过度活动症治疗核心结局指标集的制定。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Dec;28(12):1785-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3481-6. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
10
Development of an international standard set of patient-centred outcome measures for overall paediatric health: a consensus process.制定一套以患者为中心的国际通用儿童健康结局指标集:共识过程。
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Sep;106(9):868-876. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320345. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Combinations of intrinsic capacity and frailty and their associations with self-rated health in community-dwelling older adults.社区居住老年人的内在能力与衰弱的组合及其与自评健康的关联。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Sep 6;37(1):275. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03189-z.
2
I'm Co-development of a Post-Acute Care Intervention for Frailty using Information and Communication technology (PACIFIC): a development process protocol.我参与了一项利用信息通信技术针对虚弱开展的急性后期护理干预措施的联合开发(PACIFIC):一项开发过程协议。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 16;15(8):e096691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096691.
3
Associations between sarcopenia and domains of quality of life in older adults: a population-based cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data.利用常规基层医疗电子健康记录数据开发并验证电子衰弱指数
Age Ageing. 2016 May;45(3):353-60. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw039. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
2
Measured outcomes of chronic care programs for older adults: a systematic review.老年人慢性护理项目的测量结果:一项系统综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Oct 26;15:139. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0136-7.
3
Multimorbidity--older adults need health care that can count past one.多重疾病——老年人需要能兼顾多种疾病的医疗保健。
老年人肌肉减少症与生活质量各领域之间的关联:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 14;23(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02358-y.
4
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia: Challenges: A Narrative Review.亚洲心血管疾病的一级预防:挑战:一篇叙述性综述
JACC Adv. 2025 Apr;4(4):101670. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101670. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
5
Moving from just measuring, to acting on frailty in specialties outside geriatrics.从仅仅进行评估,转向在老年医学以外的专科针对衰弱采取行动。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Feb;16(1):179-181. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01154-7.
6
Health and Well-Being of Older People in the City of Valencia: A Comprehensive Study.瓦伦西亚市老年人的健康与福祉:一项综合研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;12(24):2526. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242526.
7
Development of a standard set of key work-related outcomes for use in practice for patients with cardiovascular disease: a modified Delphi study.制定一套用于心血管疾病患者实践的关键工作相关结局标准集:一项改良德尔菲研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Dec 18;8(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00825-6.
8
A comprehensive experience-based framework of actionable priorities to enhance Canada's health and social care system: discussions with older persons, clinicians, managers, and decision-makers using nominal group technique.一个全面的基于经验的可操作优先事项框架,以加强加拿大的卫生和社会保健系统:使用名义群体技术与老年人、临床医生、管理人员和决策者进行讨论。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05561-6.
9
Comprehensive geriatric assessment, and related interventions, to improve outcomes for older patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a systematic review.综合老年评估及相关干预措施对接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的老年患者预后的改善作用:一项系统评价
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Dec;15(6):1615-1630. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01035-5. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
10
A decade of change towards Value-Based Health Care at a Dutch University Hospital: a complexity-informed process study.荷兰大学附属医院迈向基于价值的医疗保健的十年:一项复杂性知情的过程研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 5;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01181-z.
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):587-589. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61596-8. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
4
Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners report.衰弱管理最佳实践指南:英国老年医学会、Age UK 和皇家全科医师学院报告。
Age Ageing. 2014 Nov;43(6):744-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu138.
5
How health care's successes became distractions.医疗保健的成功如何变成了干扰因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Aug;33(8):1311-3. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0752.
6
Frailty consensus: a call to action.衰弱共识:行动呼吁。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022.
7
Frailty in elderly people.老年人虚弱。
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
8
Frailty and its quantitative clinical evaluation.衰弱及其定量临床评估。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2012;42(4):333-40. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2012.412.
9
Evaluative frailty index for physical activity (EFIP): a reliable and valid instrument to measure changes in level of frailty.评估体力活动的衰弱指数(EFIP):一种可靠且有效的工具,用于测量衰弱程度的变化。
Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):551-61. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120127. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
10
Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.运用和报告德尔菲法选择医疗质量指标:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476. Epub 2011 Jun 9.