J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 May;118(5):815-823. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.11.009. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
Accumulating evidence suggests the important role of the home food environment in an individual's dietary intake.
This study examined the associations of individual and neighborhood-level factors with the availability of healthy and unhealthy foods in the home using a nationally representative sample from the 2007 to 2008 and 2009 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES).
A cross-sectional study design was used with NHANES merged with the 2000 census data. Food availability was measured through self-report questionnaire regarding the frequency of foods or drinks available in the home.
The analysis included 8,975 participants aged 19 to 65 years.
Associations of individual and neighborhood factors with home food availability (always or most of the time available) were assessed using logistic regression modeling accounting for NHANES' complex survey design and weights. Individual-level and neighborhood-level factors were simultaneously included in the analysis.
Family income-to-needs ratio was positively associated with the availability of dark green vegetables (odds ratio [OR]=1.07; 95% CI=1.00 to 1.13), fat-free or low-fat milk (OR=1.16; 95% CI=1.07 to 1.25), and salty snacks (OR=1.12; 95% CI=1.04 to 1.20) in the home. College graduates were more likely to have fruits (OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.48 to 2.60), vegetables (OR=1.48; 95% CI=1.16 to 1.88), and fat-free or low-fat milk (OR=1.81; 95% CI=1.55 to 2.12) and less likely to have salty snacks (OR=0.77; 95% CI=0.63 to 0.95) and sugary drinks (OR=0.46, 95% CI=0.37 to 0.57) available compared with non-college graduates. Tract socioeconomic status (SES) scores were positively associated with fruit (OR=1.15; 95% CI=1.02 to 1.29), vegetable (OR=1.14; 95% CI=1.03 to 1.26), and fat-free or low-fat milk (OR=1.25; 95% CI=1.10 to 1.42) availability. Urban residents were associated with greater availability of fruits (OR=1.47; 95% CI=1.05 to 2.08) and fat-free or low-fat milk (OR=1.33; 95% CI=1.02 to 1.73) in the home compared with rural residents. Food desert status was not associated with home food availability.
The results show that SES at both individual (education, income) and neighborhood level was linked to home food availability, suggesting a need to improve the home food environment for socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals and neighborhoods.
越来越多的证据表明,家庭食品环境在个体饮食摄入方面起着重要作用。
本研究使用来自 2007 年至 2008 年和 2009 年至 2010 年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)的全国代表性样本,研究个体和社区层面因素与家庭中健康和不健康食品供应的关系。
本研究采用横断面研究设计,将 NHANES 与 2000 年人口普查数据合并。通过自我报告问卷测量食品供应情况,询问家庭中各种食物或饮料的供应频率。
分析纳入了 8975 名年龄在 19 至 65 岁之间的参与者。
使用逻辑回归模型评估个体和社区因素与家庭食品供应(始终或大多数时间供应)之间的关联,该模型考虑了 NHANES 的复杂调查设计和权重。个体层面和社区层面的因素同时纳入分析。
家庭收入与需求比与家庭中深绿色蔬菜(比值比[OR]=1.07;95%可信区间[CI]=1.00 至 1.13)、无脂或低脂牛奶(OR=1.16;95%CI=1.07 至 1.25)和咸味零食(OR=1.12;95%CI=1.04 至 1.20)的供应呈正相关。大学毕业生更有可能食用水果(OR=1.96,95%CI=1.48 至 2.60)、蔬菜(OR=1.48;95%CI=1.16 至 1.88)和无脂或低脂牛奶(OR=1.81;95%CI=1.55 至 2.12),不太可能食用咸味零食(OR=0.77;95%CI=0.63 至 0.95)和含糖饮料(OR=0.46,95%CI=0.37 至 0.57)。社区社会经济地位(SES)评分与水果(OR=1.15;95%CI=1.02 至 1.29)、蔬菜(OR=1.14;95%CI=1.03 至 1.26)和无脂或低脂牛奶(OR=1.25;95%CI=1.10 至 1.42)的供应呈正相关。与农村居民相比,城市居民的家庭中水果(OR=1.47;95%CI=1.05 至 2.08)和无脂或低脂牛奶(OR=1.33;95%CI=1.02 至 1.73)的供应更为丰富。食品荒漠状况与家庭食品供应无关。
结果表明,个体(教育、收入)和社区层面的 SES 与家庭食品供应有关,这表明需要改善社会经济劣势个体和社区的家庭食品环境。