Seeber Isabella, de Vreede Gert-Jan, Maier Ronald, Weber Barbara
J Manag Inf Syst. 2018 Jan 2;34(4):939-969. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2017.1393303. eCollection 2017.
Collaborative brainstorming is often followed by a convergence activity where teams extract the most promising ideas on a useful level of detail from the brainstorming results. Contrary to the wealth of research on electronic brainstorming, there is a dearth of research on convergence. We used experimental methods for an in-depth exploration of two facilitation-based interventions in a convergence activity: attention guidance (focusing participants on procedures to execute a convergence task) and discussion encouragement (engaging participants in conversations to combine knowledge on ideas). Our findings show that both attention guidance and discussion encouragement are correlated with higher convergence quality. We argue that attention guidance's contribution is in its support of coordination, information processing, and goal specification. Similar, we argue that discussion encouragement's contribution is in its stimulation of idea clarification and idea combination. Contrary to past research, our findings further show that satisfaction was higher after convergence than after brainstorming.
协同头脑风暴之后通常会进行聚合活动,在该活动中,团队从头脑风暴的结果中提取出在有用的详细程度上最具潜力的想法。与大量关于电子头脑风暴的研究相反,关于聚合的研究却很匮乏。我们采用实验方法深入探究了聚合活动中两种基于促进的干预措施:注意力引导(让参与者专注于执行聚合任务的程序)和讨论鼓励(促使参与者进行对话以整合关于想法的知识)。我们的研究结果表明,注意力引导和讨论鼓励都与更高的聚合质量相关。我们认为,注意力引导的作用在于其对协调、信息处理和目标明确的支持。同样,我们认为讨论鼓励的作用在于其对想法澄清和想法整合的促进。与过去的研究相反,我们的研究结果还表明,聚合后的满意度高于头脑风暴后的满意度。