• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头脑风暴中的认知刺激。

Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming.

作者信息

Dugosh K L, Paulus P B, Roland E J, Yang H C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington 76015, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Nov;79(5):722-35. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.722.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.722
PMID:11079237
Abstract

Research on group brainstorming has demonstrated that it is less effective for generating large numbers of ideas than individual brainstorming, yet various scholars have presumed that group idea sharing should enhance cognitive stimulation and idea production. Three experiments examined the potential of cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Experiments 1 and 2 used a paradigm in which individuals were exposed to ideas on audiotape as they were brainstorming, and Experiment 3 used the electronic brainstorming paradigm. Evidence was obtained for enhanced idea generation both during and after idea exposure. The attentional set of the participant and the content of the exposure manipulation (number of ideas, presence of irrelevant information) influenced this effect. These results are consistent with a cognitive perspective on group brainstorming.

摘要

关于群体头脑风暴的研究表明,在产生大量想法方面,它不如个体头脑风暴有效,但许多学者推测群体想法分享应该会增强认知刺激和想法产生。三项实验检验了头脑风暴中认知刺激的潜力。实验1和实验2采用了一种范式,即个体在头脑风暴时通过听录音带接触想法,实验3采用了电子头脑风暴范式。在想法接触期间和之后都获得了想法产生增强的证据。参与者的注意力集中点和接触操作的内容(想法数量、无关信息的存在)影响了这种效果。这些结果与关于群体头脑风暴的认知观点一致。

相似文献

1
Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming.头脑风暴中的认知刺激。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Nov;79(5):722-35. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.722.
2
Asynchronous Brainstorming in an Industrial Setting: Exploratory Studies.工业环境中的异步头脑风暴:探索性研究
Hum Factors. 2015 Sep;57(6):1076-94. doi: 10.1177/0018720815570374. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
3
Unblocking brainstorms.解除思维阻塞的头脑风暴。
J Appl Psychol. 1991 Feb;76(1):137-42. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.137.
4
[The productivity of electronic brainstorming: a comparison of three systems with a control].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2001 Apr;72(1):19-28. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.72.19.
5
How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups.群体如何影响思维:群体中创意生成的认知模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):186-213. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1.
6
Imagination links with schizotypal beliefs, not with creativity or learning.想象与精神分裂型信念有关,而与创造力或学习无关。
Br J Psychol. 2019 Nov;110(4):707-726. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12369. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
7
Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model.情绪与创造力关联中的享乐色调和激活水平:迈向创造力模型的双路径
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):739-56. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739.
8
Brainstorming in large groups as a facilitator of children's creative responses.作为儿童创造性反应的促进方式,在大群体中进行头脑风暴。
J Psychol. 1973 Jan;83(1st Half):117-22. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1973.9915598.
9
Electronic Brainstorming With a Chatbot Partner: A Good Idea Due to Increased Productivity and Idea Diversity.与聊天机器人伙伴进行电子头脑风暴:因提高生产力和想法多样性而成为一个好主意。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Sep 23;5:880673. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.880673. eCollection 2022.
10
Effects of Leader Tactics on the Creativity, Implementation, and Evolution of Ideas to Improve Healthcare Delivery.领导者策略对改善医疗服务的创意、实施和演变的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):341-348. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06139-9. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Stage 2 Registered Report Personal factors and group creative outcomes: A correlational meta-analysis.第二阶段注册报告 个人因素与团队创造性成果:一项相关性元分析
F1000Res. 2024 Aug 7;13:904. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145939.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of the quality and diversity of reference products on creative activities in online communities.参考产品的质量和多样性对在线社区创造性活动的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):15316. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65124-y.
3
Generative preparation tasks in digital collaborative learning: actor and partner effects of constructive preparation activities on deep comprehension.
数字协作学习中的生成性准备任务:建设性准备活动对深度理解的参与者和伙伴效应
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1335682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335682. eCollection 2024.
4
Reactions to a Hypothetical Ban of Open-System Electronic Cigarettes Among People Who Currently Use Electronic Cigarettes.当前使用电子烟人群对开放系统电子烟假设禁令的反应。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Jan 22;27(2):308-316. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae020.
5
Electronic Cigarette Users' Reactions and Responses to a Hypothetical Nicotine Concentration Reduction in Electronic Cigarette Liquids.电子烟用户对电子烟液中假设尼古丁浓度降低的反应和应对措施。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(10):1202-1211. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2212280. Epub 2023 May 24.
6
Dyads or quads? Impact of group size and learning context on collaborative learning.二人组还是四人组?小组规模和学习环境对合作学习的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1168208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168208. eCollection 2023.
7
Can the Effect of Problem Solvers' Characteristics on Adolescents' Cooperative Problem Solving Ability Be Improved by Group Sizes?问题解决者特征对青少年合作解决问题能力的影响能否通过小组规模来改善?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416575.
8
Electronic cigarette users' reactions and responses to a hypothetical ban of flavoured electronic cigarette liquids.电子烟用户对假设的禁止调味电子烟液的反应和回应。
Tob Control. 2022 Nov;31(Suppl 3):s197-s205. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057454.
9
Evaluation of staff satisfaction after the implementation of a daily goals sheet in the routine work of an oral outpatient department and its influence on work efficiency.评估在口腔门诊日常工作中实施每日目标清单后对员工满意度的影响及其对工作效率的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 17;22(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08028-9.
10
Impacts of COVID-19 on cigarette use, smoking behaviors, and tobacco purchasing behaviors.新冠肺炎对吸烟、吸烟行为和烟草购买行为的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Dec 1;229(Pt B):109144. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109144. Epub 2021 Oct 28.