• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智利儿童和青少年的心理健康:“长处与困难问卷”的结构效度、信度及父母与青少年的一致性

Mental health among children and adolescents: Construct validity, reliability, and parent-adolescent agreement on the 'Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire' in Chile.

作者信息

Gaete Jorge, Montero-Marin Jesus, Valenzuela Daniela, Rojas-Barahona Cristian A, Olivares Esterbina, Araya Ricardo

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.

Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0191809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191809. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0191809
PMID:29401472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5798763/
Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a screening tool used to measure psychological functioning among children and adolescents. It has been extensively used worldwide, but its psychometric properties, such as internal structure and reliability, seem to vary across countries. This is the first study exploring the construct validity and reliability of the Spanish version of SDQ among early adolescents (self-reported) and their parents in Latin America. A total of 1,284 early adolescents (9-15 years) and their parents answered the SDQ. We also collected demographic variables. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the latent structure of the SDQ. We also used the multitrait-multimethod analysis to separate the true variance on the constructs from variance resulting from measurement methods (self-report vs. parent report), and evaluated the agreement between adolescents and their parents. We found that the original five-factor model was a good solution and the resulting sub-scales had good internal consistency. We also found that the self-reported and parental versions of SDQ provide different information, which are complementary and provide a better picture of the emotional, social, and conduct problems of adolescents. We have added evidence for the construct validity and reliability of the Spanish self-reported and parental SDQ versions in a Chilean sample.

摘要

优势与困难问卷(SDQ)是一种用于测量儿童和青少年心理功能的筛查工具。它在全球范围内得到了广泛应用,但其心理测量特性,如内部结构和信度,似乎因国家而异。这是第一项探讨拉丁美洲青少年早期(自我报告)及其父母中SDQ西班牙语版本的结构效度和信度的研究。共有1284名青少年早期(9 - 15岁)及其父母回答了SDQ。我们还收集了人口统计学变量。进行了验证性因素分析以评估SDQ的潜在结构。我们还使用多特质多方法分析将构念上的真变异与测量方法(自我报告与父母报告)产生的变异分开,并评估青少年与其父母之间的一致性。我们发现原始的五因素模型是一个很好的解决方案,并且由此产生的子量表具有良好的内部一致性。我们还发现SDQ的自我报告版本和父母报告版本提供了不同的信息,这些信息是互补的,并且能更好地描绘青少年的情绪、社交和行为问题。我们为智利样本中SDQ西班牙语自我报告版本和父母报告版本的结构效度和信度增加了证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed6a/5798763/7e5e137e8571/pone.0191809.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed6a/5798763/9c237180b716/pone.0191809.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed6a/5798763/a39feb657036/pone.0191809.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed6a/5798763/7e5e137e8571/pone.0191809.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed6a/5798763/9c237180b716/pone.0191809.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed6a/5798763/a39feb657036/pone.0191809.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed6a/5798763/7e5e137e8571/pone.0191809.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Mental health among children and adolescents: Construct validity, reliability, and parent-adolescent agreement on the 'Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire' in Chile.智利儿童和青少年的心理健康:“长处与困难问卷”的结构效度、信度及父母与青少年的一致性
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0191809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191809. eCollection 2018.
2
Evaluating the psychometric properties of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years.评估家长评定的 Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire 在加拿大 6 至 17 岁儿童和青少年全国代表性样本中的心理计量特性。
Health Rep. 2020 Aug 19;31(8):13-20. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202000800002-eng.
3
Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study.德国儿童和青少年普通人群中父母版优势与困难问卷的心理测量特性:贝拉研究结果
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:99-105. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1011-2.
4
Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.德国优势与困难问卷自陈版在流行病学背景下的常模数据。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Nov;46(6):523-533. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000589. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence.五因素优势与困难问卷(SDQ)在青春期前、青春期早期和晚期的结构效度。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;49(12):1304-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01942.x.
6
Psychometric properties and normative data of the Latvian and Russian language versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in the Latvian general adolescent population.拉脱维亚和俄罗斯语版《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)在拉脱维亚普通青少年人群中的心理测量学特性和常模数据。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2024 May;78(4):301-311. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2319662. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)--further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents.长处与困难问卷(SDQ)——关于其在荷兰儿童和青少年社区样本中的信度和效度的进一步证据。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2.
8
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Self-Report: A Valid Instrument for the Identification of Emotional and Behavioral Problems.长处与困难问卷(自我报告版):一种有效识别情绪和行为问题的工具。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 May-Jun;19(4):471-476. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
9
Validity and reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in 5-6 year olds: differences by gender or by parental education?5-6 岁儿童长处和困难问卷的有效性和可靠性:性别或父母教育程度的差异?
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036805. Epub 2012 May 18.
10
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for Spanish 5- to 17-Year-Olds.长处与困难问卷:西班牙 5 至 17 岁儿童的心理测量特性和常模数据。
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1445-1458. doi: 10.1177/1073191120918929. Epub 2020 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Agreement between child- and informant-based mental health assessments: results from a national population-based study in Lebanon.基于儿童和 informant 的心理健康评估之间的一致性:黎巴嫩一项全国性基于人群研究的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02920-5.
2
Testing the sensitivity of diagnosis-derived patterns in functional brain networks to symptom burden in a Norwegian youth sample.测试功能脑网络中基于诊断的模式对挪威青年样本中症状负担的敏感性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 15;45(3):e26631. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26631.
3
Community strategies for health promotion and prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases with a focus on physical activity and nutrition: the URO/FOCOS study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening Efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Systematic Review.儿童行为量表和长处与困难问卷的筛查效率:一项系统评价
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2008 Sep;13(3):140-147. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00461.x. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
2
The assessment of emotional and Behavioural problems: Internal structure of The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.情绪与行为问题评估:长处与困难问卷的内部结构
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 Sep-Dec;15(3):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
3
The KiVa antibullying program in primary schools in Chile, with and without the digital game component: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
以体力活动和营养为重点的促进健康和预防慢性非传染性疾病的社区策略:URO/FOCOS 研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 12;11:1268322. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268322. eCollection 2023.
4
Commentary: Adaptation of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire for Use in the Republic of Georgia.评论:《长处与困难问卷》在格鲁吉亚共和国的适用性调整
Alpha Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 1;24(4):136-137. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.110723. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Parent-adolescent informant discrepancy on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the UK Millennium Cohort Study.英国千禧队列研究中父母与青少年对优势与困难问卷的报告差异
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 May 11;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00605-y.
6
Validation of the Spanish version of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) to identify and assess psychosocial problems among early adolescents in Chile.验证西班牙语版儿科症状清单(PSC)在智利早期青少年中识别和评估心理社会问题的有效性。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283921. eCollection 2023.
7
Construct-related validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaires with three and five dimensions: A multitrait-multimethod analysis.三、五维度《长处与困难问卷》的结构效度:多重特质-多重方法分析。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;28(4):1595-1611. doi: 10.1177/13591045231168703. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
The effectiveness of a tablet-based video game that stimulates cognitive, emotional, and social skills in developing academic skills among preschoolers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于平板电脑的视频游戏对学龄前儿童发展学业技能的认知、情感和社交技能的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Nov 9;23(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06875-9.
9
Children's Mental Health: Discrepancy between Child Self-Reporting and Parental Reporting.儿童心理健康:儿童自我报告与家长报告之间的差异。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Oct 19;12(10):401. doi: 10.3390/bs12100401.
10
Validation of brief screening instruments for internalizing and externalizing disorders in Mozambican adolescents.验证用于莫桑比克青少年内化和外化障碍的简短筛查工具。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04189-3.
智利小学的KiVa反欺凌项目,有无数字游戏组件:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 20;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1810-1.
4
Validation of the Spanish Version of the Psychological Sense of School Membership (PSSM) Scale in Chilean Adolescents and Its Association with School-Related Outcomes and Substance Use.智利青少年中学校归属感心理量表(PSSM)西班牙语版本的验证及其与学校相关结果和物质使用的关联
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 6;7:1901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01901. eCollection 2016.
5
Early Detection and Prevention of Mental Health Problems: Developmental Epidemiology and Systems of Support.早期发现和预防心理健康问题:发展流行病学和支持系统。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016 Nov-Dec;45(6):710-717. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1236728. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Brief report: Association between psychological sense of school membership and mental health among early adolescents.简短报告:青少年早期学校归属感与心理健康之间的关联
J Adolesc. 2016 Jul;50:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 2.
7
Empirical Comparison Between Factor Analysis and Multidimensional Item Response Models.因子分析与多维项目反应模型的实证比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Jul 1;26(3):457-77. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_5.
8
Recovery of Weak Common Factors by Maximum Likelihood and Ordinary Least Squares Estimation.通过最大似然估计和普通最小二乘法估计恢复弱公共因子
Multivariate Behav Res. 2003 Jan 1;38(1):25-56. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_2.
9
Ordinary Least Squares Estimation of Parameters in Exploratory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data.序数数据探索性因子分析中参数的普通最小二乘估计
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Mar 30;47(2):314-39. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.658340.
10
Evidence for the effectiveness of a national school-based mental health program in Chile.智利全国学校心理健康计划有效性的证据。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;54(10):799-807.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Aug 3.