• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估惰性乳腺癌在筛查试验中的发生频率。

Estimating the frequency of indolent breast cancer in screening trials.

机构信息

1 Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

2 Program in Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1261-1271. doi: 10.1177/0962280217754232. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1177/0962280217754232
PMID:29402176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6027608/
Abstract

Cancer screening can detect cancer that would not have been detected in a patient's lifetime without screening. Standard methods for analyzing screening data do not explicitly account for the possibility that a fraction of tumors may remain latent indefinitely. We extend these methods by representing cancers as a mixture of those that progress to symptoms (progressive) and those that remain latent (indolent). Given sensitivity of the screening test, we derive likelihood expressions to simultaneously estimate (1) the rate of onset of preclinical cancer, (2) the average preclinical duration of progressive cancers, and (3) the fraction of preclinical cancers that are indolent. Simulations demonstrate satisfactory performance of the estimation approach to identify model parameters subject to precise specifications of input parameters and adequate numbers of interval cancers. In application to four breast cancer screening trials, the estimated indolent fraction among preclinical cancers varies between 2% and 35% when assuming 80% test sensitivity and varying specifications for the earliest time that participants could plausibly have developed cancer. We conclude that standard methods for analyzing screening data can be extended to allow some indolent cancers, but accurate estimation depends on correctly specifying key inputs that may be difficult to determine precisely in practice.

摘要

癌症筛查可以检测到在没有筛查的情况下患者一生中都无法检测到的癌症。分析筛查数据的标准方法并没有明确考虑到一部分肿瘤可能无限期潜伏的可能性。我们通过将癌症表示为进展到症状(进行性)和潜伏(惰性)的肿瘤的混合物来扩展这些方法。考虑到筛查测试的敏感性,我们推导出似然表达式,以同时估计(1)临床前癌症的发病速度,(2)进行性癌症的平均临床前持续时间,以及(3)潜伏的临床前癌症的比例。模拟表明,该估计方法在识别模型参数方面具有令人满意的性能,这些参数受到输入参数的精确规范和足够数量的间隔性癌症的限制。在对四项乳腺癌筛查试验的应用中,当假设 80%的测试敏感性和参与者可能最早发生癌症的不同规范时,临床前癌症中的惰性比例在 2%到 35%之间变化。我们得出的结论是,分析筛查数据的标准方法可以扩展到允许一些惰性癌症,但准确的估计取决于正确指定关键输入,这些输入在实践中可能难以准确确定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb02/6027608/d5dc53e01be7/nihms951386f3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb02/6027608/831c1fbb0d1f/nihms951386f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb02/6027608/b94c892c6550/nihms951386f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb02/6027608/d5dc53e01be7/nihms951386f3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb02/6027608/831c1fbb0d1f/nihms951386f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb02/6027608/b94c892c6550/nihms951386f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb02/6027608/d5dc53e01be7/nihms951386f3a.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the frequency of indolent breast cancer in screening trials.评估惰性乳腺癌在筛查试验中的发生频率。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1261-1271. doi: 10.1177/0962280217754232. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
2
Identification of the Fraction of Indolent Tumors and Associated Overdiagnosis in Breast Cancer Screening Trials.识别乳腺癌筛查试验中的惰性肿瘤部分和相关过度诊断。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 1;188(1):197-205. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy214.
3
Overdiagnosis in the population-based organized breast cancer screening program estimated by a non-homogeneous multi-state model: a cohort study using individual data with long-term follow-up.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查计划中过度诊断的估计:使用具有长期随访的个体数据的非同质多状态模型的队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 17;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1082-z.
4
Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.乳腺 X 光筛查:医学中的一个重大问题。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Feb;90:34-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
Estimation of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening using a non-homogeneous multi-state model: A simulation study.使用非齐次多状态模型估计乳腺癌筛查中的过度诊断:一项模拟研究。
J Med Screen. 2018 Dec;25(4):183-190. doi: 10.1177/0969141317733294. Epub 2017 Nov 19.
6
Will supplemental screening ultrasound increase breast cancer overdiagnosis?补充性筛查超声会增加乳腺癌的过度诊断吗?
Acad Radiol. 2015 Aug;22(8):967-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.10.012. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
7
[Overdiagnosis in mammography screening for breast cancer].[乳腺癌钼靶筛查中的过度诊断]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 10;38(11):1574-1578. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.11.027.
8
Conditions for Valid Empirical Estimates of Cancer Overdiagnosis in Randomized Trials and Population Studies.随机试验和人群研究中癌症过度诊断有效实证估计的条件
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Jul 15;184(2):140-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv342. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
9
Breast cancer biology varies by method of detection and may contribute to overdiagnosis.乳腺癌生物学因检测方法而异,可能导致过度诊断。
Surgery. 2016 Aug;160(2):454-62. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Obligate Overdiagnosis Due to Mammographic Screening: A Direct Estimate for U.S. Women.因乳腺 X 光筛查导致的必然过度诊断:美国女性的直接评估
Radiology. 2018 May;287(2):391-397. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171622. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying Overdiagnosis for Multicancer Detection Tests: A Novel Method.多癌检测试验中过度诊断的量化:一种新方法。
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5935-5943. doi: 10.1002/sim.10285. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
Designing cancer screening trials for reduction in late-stage cancer incidence.设计癌症筛查试验以减少晚期癌症发病率。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae097.
3
The Contrasting Seasonality Patterns of Some Cancer-Types and Herpes Zoster Can Be Explained by a Binary Classification of Immunological Reactions.某些癌症类型和带状疱疹截然不同的季节性模式可以通过免疫反应的二元分类来解释。
J Inflamm Res. 2022 Dec 15;15:6761-6771. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S392082. eCollection 2022.
4
A progressive three-state model to estimate time to cancer: a likelihood-based approach.一种渐进式三状态模型来估计癌症发生时间:基于似然的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01645-2.
5
The future of early cancer detection.早期癌症检测的未来。
Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):666-677. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01746-x. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
6
Quantifying the duration of the preclinical detectable phase in cancer screening: a systematic review.定量癌症筛查中临床前可检测阶段的持续时间:系统评价。
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022008. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022008. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Conditions for Valid Empirical Estimates of Cancer Overdiagnosis in Randomized Trials and Population Studies.随机试验和人群研究中癌症过度诊断有效实证估计的条件
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Jul 15;184(2):140-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv342. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
2
Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.美国不同乳腺癌筛查策略相关获益与危害的协同建模
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):215-25. doi: 10.7326/M15-1536. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
3
Recognizing the Limitations of Cancer Overdiagnosis Studies: A First Step Towards Overcoming Them.认识癌症过度诊断研究的局限性:克服这些局限性的第一步。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 18;108(3). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv345. Print 2016 Mar.
4
Author's Reply.作者回复。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Nov;11(11):1098-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.036. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
5
Lead-time models should not be used to estimate overdiagnosis in cancer screening.不应使用提前期模型来估计癌症筛查中的过度诊断。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Sep;29(9):1283-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2812-2. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
6
Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening.在乳腺癌和前列腺癌筛查中,研究特征和方法对过度诊断估计的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):831-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00008.
7
Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence.三十年来乳腺 X 线筛查对乳腺癌发病率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):1998-2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206809.
8
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.由于乳腺 X 线筛查导致的浸润性乳腺癌过度诊断:来自挪威筛查项目的结果。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):491-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00005.
9
Overdiagnosis from non-progressive cancer detected by screening mammography: stochastic simulation study with calibration to population based registry data.筛查性乳房 X 光摄影检测到的非进展性癌症过度诊断:基于人群登记数据校准的随机模拟研究。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7017. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7017.
10
Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.美国社区实践中数字与屏片式乳腺 X 线摄影的比较效果:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):493-502. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005.