• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多癌检测试验中过度诊断的量化:一种新方法。

Quantifying Overdiagnosis for Multicancer Detection Tests: A Novel Method.

作者信息

Baker Stuart G

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5935-5943. doi: 10.1002/sim.10285. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1002/sim.10285
PMID:39592444
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11639630/
Abstract

Multicancer detection (MCD) tests use blood specimens to detect preclinical cancers. A major concern is overdiagnosis, the detection of preclinical cancer on screening that would not have developed into symptomatic cancer in the absence of screening. Because overdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary and harmful treatments, its quantification is important. A key metric is the screen overdiagnosis fraction (SOF), the probability of overdiagnosis at screen detection. Estimating SOF is notoriously difficult because overdiagnosis is not observed. This estimation is more challenging with MCD tests because short-term results are needed as the technology is rapidly changing. To estimate average SOF for a program of yearly MCD tests, I introduce a novel method that requires at least two yearly MCD tests given to persons having a wide range of ages and applies only to cancers for which there is no conventional screening. The method assumes an exponential distribution for the sojourn time in an operational screen-detectable preclinical cancer (OPC) state, defined as once screen-detectable (positive screen and work-up), always screen-detectable. Because this assumption appears in only one term in the SOF formula, the results are robust to violations of the assumption. An SOF plot graphs average SOF versus mean sojourn time. With lung cancer screening data and synthetic data, SOF plots distinguished small from moderate levels of SOF. With its unique set of assumptions, the SOF plot would complement other modeling approaches for estimating SOF once sufficient short-term observational data on MCD tests become available.

摘要

多癌检测(MCD)测试利用血液样本检测临床前癌症。一个主要担忧是过度诊断,即在筛查中检测到临床前癌症,而如果没有筛查,这些癌症不会发展为有症状的癌症。由于过度诊断可能导致不必要的有害治疗,对其进行量化很重要。一个关键指标是筛查过度诊断率(SOF),即筛查检测时过度诊断的概率。估计SOF非常困难,因为过度诊断无法观察到。对于MCD测试来说,这种估计更具挑战性,因为随着技术迅速变化,需要短期结果。为了估计每年进行MCD测试项目的平均SOF,我引入了一种新方法,该方法要求至少对年龄范围广泛的人群进行两次年度MCD测试,并且仅适用于没有传统筛查方法的癌症。该方法假设处于可通过筛查检测到的临床前癌症(OPC)状态的停留时间呈指数分布,OPC状态定义为一旦可通过筛查检测到(筛查呈阳性并进行进一步检查),则始终可通过筛查检测到。由于这个假设仅出现在SOF公式的一个项中,所以结果对于该假设的违背具有鲁棒性。SOF图绘制了平均SOF与平均停留时间的关系。利用肺癌筛查数据和合成数据,SOF图区分了SOF的低水平和中等水平。鉴于其独特的假设集,一旦有足够的关于MCD测试的短期观测数据,SOF图将补充其他用于估计SOF的建模方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/cddb5f90fb68/SIM-43-5935-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/bc30b9410739/SIM-43-5935-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/ca1b675413d7/SIM-43-5935-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/90fc4809b245/SIM-43-5935-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/cddb5f90fb68/SIM-43-5935-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/bc30b9410739/SIM-43-5935-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/ca1b675413d7/SIM-43-5935-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/90fc4809b245/SIM-43-5935-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e9e/11639630/cddb5f90fb68/SIM-43-5935-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying Overdiagnosis for Multicancer Detection Tests: A Novel Method.多癌检测试验中过度诊断的量化:一种新方法。
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5935-5943. doi: 10.1002/sim.10285. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
Cancer screening with multicancer detection tests: A translational science review.多癌种检测试验进行癌症筛查:转化科学述评。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jul-Aug;74(4):368-382. doi: 10.3322/caac.21833. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Design of randomized controlled trials to estimate cancer-mortality reductions from multicancer detection screening.用于评估多癌检测筛查降低癌症死亡率的随机对照试验设计。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Feb 1;117(2):303-311. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae247.
4
Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom.对英国40至49岁女性因乳腺钼靶筛查导致的乳腺癌过度诊断进行建模。
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 29;14(6):R152. doi: 10.1186/bcr3365.
5
Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.乳腺 X 光筛查:医学中的一个重大问题。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Feb;90:34-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
Multicancer Detection (MCD) Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers: An Evolving Tool for Early Diagnosis.胃肠道癌症的多癌检测(MCD)测试:一种不断发展的早期诊断工具。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Mar 6;27(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-00970-y.
7
Estimation of overdiagnosis using short-term trends and lead time estimates uncontaminated by overdiagnosed cases: Results from the Norwegian Breast Screening Programme.利用短期趋势和未受过度诊断病例污染的领先时间估计来评估过度诊断:挪威乳腺癌筛查项目的结果。
J Med Screen. 2016 Dec;23(4):192-202. doi: 10.1177/0969141315623980. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
8
Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.前列腺特异性抗原筛查中的提前期和过度诊断:方法及背景的重要性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp001. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
9
Quantifying Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review to Evaluate the Methodology.定量癌症筛查中的过度诊断:评估方法的系统评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Oct 1;109(10). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx060.
10
Overdiagnosis in the population-based organized breast cancer screening program estimated by a non-homogeneous multi-state model: a cohort study using individual data with long-term follow-up.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查计划中过度诊断的估计:使用具有长期随访的个体数据的非同质多状态模型的队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 17;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1082-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer screening with multicancer detection tests: A translational science review.多癌种检测试验进行癌症筛查:转化科学述评。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jul-Aug;74(4):368-382. doi: 10.3322/caac.21833. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
2
A blood test for multiple cancers: game changer or overhyped?一种针对多种癌症的血液检测:改变游戏规则还是炒作过度?
BMJ. 2022 Sep 21;378:o2279. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o2279.
3
Estimation of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis in a U.S. Breast Screening Cohort.美国乳腺筛查队列中乳腺癌过度诊断的评估。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):471-478. doi: 10.7326/M21-3577. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
4
The case for a cancer paradox initiative.癌症悖论倡议的理由。
Carcinogenesis. 2021 Aug 19;42(8):1023-1025. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgab052.
5
Modeling the mean time to interval cancer after negative results of periodic cancer screening.对定期癌症筛查结果为阴性后的间隔期癌症平均发病时间进行建模。
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 15;40(6):1429-1439. doi: 10.1002/sim.8849. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
6
Breast cancer overdiagnosis in stop-screen trials: More uncertainty than previously reported.停筛试验中的乳腺癌过度诊断:比先前报道的更不确定。
J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):185-192. doi: 10.1177/0969141320950784. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
7
Modeling the overdetection of screen-identified cancers in population-based cancer screening with the Coxian phase-type Markov process.使用Coxian阶段型马尔可夫过程对基于人群的癌症筛查中筛查发现癌症的过度检测进行建模。
Stat Med. 2020 Feb 28;39(5):660-673. doi: 10.1002/sim.8437. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Estimating the frequency of indolent breast cancer in screening trials.评估惰性乳腺癌在筛查试验中的发生频率。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1261-1271. doi: 10.1177/0962280217754232. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Estimation of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening using a non-homogeneous multi-state model: A simulation study.使用非齐次多状态模型估计乳腺癌筛查中的过度诊断:一项模拟研究。
J Med Screen. 2018 Dec;25(4):183-190. doi: 10.1177/0969141317733294. Epub 2017 Nov 19.
10
Estimation of overdiagnosis using short-term trends and lead time estimates uncontaminated by overdiagnosed cases: Results from the Norwegian Breast Screening Programme.利用短期趋势和未受过度诊断病例污染的领先时间估计来评估过度诊断:挪威乳腺癌筛查项目的结果。
J Med Screen. 2016 Dec;23(4):192-202. doi: 10.1177/0969141315623980. Epub 2016 Mar 2.