Sato Marc, Shiller Douglas M
Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Aix-Marseille Université & CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France; Brain and Language Research Institute, Aix-en-Provence, France.
School of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Université de Montréal, Canada; Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Canada; Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music, Montreal, Canada.
Brain Lang. 2018 Dec;187:92-103. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 May 7.
In the present EEG study, the role of auditory prediction in speech was explored through the comparison of auditory cortical responses during active speaking and passive listening to the same acoustic speech signals. Two manipulations of sensory prediction accuracy were used during the speaking task: (1) a real-time change in vowel F1 feedback (reducing prediction accuracy relative to unaltered feedback) and (2) presenting a stable auditory target rather than a visual cue to speak (enhancing auditory prediction accuracy during baseline productions, and potentially enhancing the perturbing effect of altered feedback). While subjects compensated for the F1 manipulation, no difference between the auditory-cue and visual-cue conditions were found. Under visually-cued conditions, reduced N1/P2 amplitude was observed during speaking vs. listening, reflecting a motor-to-sensory prediction. In addition, a significant correlation was observed between the magnitude of behavioral compensatory F1 response and the magnitude of this speaking induced suppression (SIS) for P2 during the altered auditory feedback phase, where a stronger compensatory decrease in F1 was associated with a stronger the SIS effect. Finally, under the auditory-cued condition, an auditory repetition-suppression effect was observed in N1/P2 amplitude during the listening task but not active speaking, suggesting that auditory predictive processes during speaking and passive listening are functionally distinct.
在本脑电图研究中,通过比较主动说话和被动聆听相同声学语音信号时听觉皮层的反应,探讨了听觉预测在言语中的作用。在说话任务中采用了两种操纵感觉预测准确性的方法:(1)元音F1反馈的实时变化(相对于未改变的反馈降低预测准确性)和(2)呈现稳定的听觉目标而非视觉提示来引导说话(在基线发声期间提高听觉预测准确性,并可能增强改变反馈的干扰效果)。虽然受试者对F1操纵进行了补偿,但在听觉提示和视觉提示条件之间未发现差异。在视觉提示条件下,说话时与聆听时相比,观察到N1/P2振幅降低,反映了从运动到感觉的预测。此外,在改变听觉反馈阶段,行为补偿性F1反应的幅度与P2的这种说话诱发抑制(SIS)的幅度之间观察到显著相关性,其中F1更强的补偿性降低与更强的SIS效应相关。最后,在听觉提示条件下,在聆听任务期间观察到N1/P2振幅有听觉重复抑制效应,但在主动说话时未观察到,这表明说话和被动聆听期间的听觉预测过程在功能上是不同的。