• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

qSOFA, Cue Confusion.

作者信息

Singer Mervyn, Shankar-Hari Manu

机构信息

University College London, London, United Kingdom (M.S.).

Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom (M.S.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):293-295. doi: 10.7326/M17-3415. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

DOI:10.7326/M17-3415
PMID:29404580
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
qSOFA, Cue Confusion.快速序贯器官衰竭评估，提示意识模糊。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):293-295. doi: 10.7326/M17-3415. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
2
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中，序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）评分、全身炎症反应综合征（SIRS）标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Performance of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score for prognosis of heat-related hospitalized patients.快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）评分对与热相关的住院患者预后的评估。
Heart Lung. 2020 Jul-Aug;49(4):415-419. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.02.040. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Use of CRB-65 and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment to predict site of care and mortality in pneumonia patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study.应用CRB-65和快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估预测急诊科肺炎患者的治疗地点和死亡率：一项回顾性研究
Crit Care. 2016 Jun 1;20(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1351-0.
5
Usefulness of the qSOFA score for predicting hospital mortality in cancer patients.qSOFA 评分对预测癌症患者住院死亡率的有用性。
Gac Med Mex. 2024;160(1):62-67. doi: 10.24875/GMM.M24000857.
6
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
7
Efficacy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting clinical outcomes among community-acquired pneumonia patients presenting in the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估在预测急诊科就诊的社区获得性肺炎患者临床结局中的疗效。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05044-0.
8
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population.比较不同评分系统对老年社区获得性肺炎患者死亡率和 ICU 入院率的预测作用。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Oct 28;16:1917-1929. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S335315. eCollection 2021.
9
Procalcitonin and qSOFA as a Marker of Mortality in Sepsis.降钙素原和 qSOFA 作为脓毒症死亡率的标志物。
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2024;19(3):196-203. doi: 10.2174/0115748871288534240322083746.
10
Pre-operative assessment of 30-day mortality risk after major surgery: the role of the quick sequential organ failure assessment: A retrospective observational study.大手术后 30 天死亡率的术前评估：快速序贯器官衰竭评估的作用：一项回顾性观察研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;36(9):688-694. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000957.

引用本文的文献

1
[What is confirmed in the treatment of sepsis? : An update].[脓毒症治疗中的定论是什么？：最新进展]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;65(12):1199-1208. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01794-0. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Institutional Structures and Processes to Support Sepsis Care: A Multihospital Study.支持脓毒症护理的机构结构与流程：一项多医院研究
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Nov 9;5(11):e1004. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001004. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Sepsis awareness and knowledge amongst nurses, physicians and paramedics of a tertiary care center in Switzerland: A survey-based cross-sectional study.
瑞士一家三级护理中心的护士、医生和护理人员对脓毒症的认识和了解：一项基于调查的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 28;18(6):e0285151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285151. eCollection 2023.
4
What is new and different in the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.2021 年拯救脓毒症运动指南有哪些新的和不同的内容。
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023 Dec;118(Suppl 2):75-79. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-01028-5. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
5
National Early Warning Score (NEWS) Outperforms Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure (qSOFA) Score for Early Detection of Sepsis in the Emergency Department.在急诊科，国家早期预警评分（NEWS）在脓毒症早期检测方面优于快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭（qSOFA）评分。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;11(11):1518. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111518.
6
Diagnostic Challenges in Sepsis.脓毒症的诊断挑战
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2021;23(12):22. doi: 10.1007/s11908-021-00765-y. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
7
Intensive Care Unit Scoring Systems.重症监护评分系统。
Crit Care Nurse. 2021 Aug 1;41(4):54-64. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021613.
8
A boosting inspired personalized threshold method for sepsis screening.一种受增强启发的用于脓毒症筛查的个性化阈值方法。
J Appl Stat. 2021;48(1):154-175. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1716695. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
9
Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score to Predict Sepsis Mortality in 121 Studies Including 1,716,017 Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在纳入1,716,017例个体的121项研究中，快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估评分预测脓毒症死亡率的准确性：一项系统评价和Meta分析
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Sep 17;1(9):e0043. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000043. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Usefulness of qSOFA and ECOG Scores for Predicting Hospital Mortality in Postsurgical Cancer Patients without Infection.qSOFA和ECOG评分对预测无感染的外科癌症患者医院死亡率的有效性。
Int J Chronic Dis. 2019 May 2;2019:9418971. doi: 10.1155/2019/9418971. eCollection 2019.