Fischer Marc-Olivier, Gouëzel Corentin, Fradin Sabine, Saplacan Vladimir, Gérard Jean-Louis, Fellahi Jean-Luc, Hanouz Jean-Luc
Pôle Réanimations Anesthésie SAMU/SMUR, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Caen University Hospital de Caen, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, CS 30001, 14000, Caen, France.
Department of Biology, University Hospital of Caen, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, CS 30001, 14000, Caen, France.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Dec;32(6):1135-1142. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0111-x. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
Blood glucose and its variability of is a major prognostic factor associated with morbidity. We hypothesized that intravenous microdialysis incorporated in a central venous catheter (CVC) would be interchangeable with changes in blood glucose measured by the reference method using a blood gas analyzer. Microdialysis and central venous blood glucose measurements were simultaneously recorded in high-risk cardiac surgical patients. The correlation between absolute values was determined by linear regression and the Bland-Altman test for repeated measurements was used to compare bias, precision, and limits of agreement. Changes in blood glucose measurement were evaluated by four-quadrant plot and trend interchangeability methods (TIM). In the 23 patients analyzed, the CVC was used as part of standard care with no complications. The correlation coefficient for absolute values (N = 99) was R = 0.91 (P < 0.001). The bias, precision and limits of agreement were - 9.1, 17.4 and - 43.2 to 24.9 mg/dL, respectively. The concordance rate for changes in blood glucose measurements (N = 77) was 85% with the four-quadrant plot. The TIM showed that 14 (18%) changes of blood glucose measurements were uninterpretable. Among the remaining 63 (82%) interpretable changes, 23 (37%) were interchangeable, 13 (20%) were in the gray zone, and 27 (43%) were not interchangeable. Microdialysis using a CVC appears to provide imprecise absolute blood glucose values with risk of insulin misuse. Moreover, only one third of changes in blood glucose measurements were interchangeable with the reference method using the TIM.
血糖及其变异性是与发病率相关的主要预后因素。我们假设,置于中心静脉导管(CVC)中的静脉微透析与使用血气分析仪的参考方法测量的血糖变化具有互换性。在高危心脏手术患者中同时记录微透析和中心静脉血糖测量值。通过线性回归确定绝对值之间的相关性,并使用重复测量的Bland-Altman检验来比较偏倚、精密度和一致性界限。通过四象限图和趋势互换性方法(TIM)评估血糖测量的变化。在分析的23例患者中,CVC作为标准护理的一部分使用,无并发症。绝对值(N = 99)的相关系数为R = 0.91(P < 0.001)。偏倚、精密度和一致性界限分别为-9.1、17.4和-43.2至24.9mg/dL。四象限图显示血糖测量变化(N = 77)的一致率为85%。TIM显示,14次(18%)血糖测量变化无法解释。在其余63次(82%)可解释的变化中,23次(37%)具有互换性,13次(20%)处于灰色区域,27次(43%)不具有互换性。使用CVC进行微透析似乎提供了不精确的绝对血糖值,存在胰岛素使用不当的风险。此外,使用TIM时,只有三分之一的血糖测量变化与参考方法具有互换性。