Rothman Emily F, Paruk Jennifer, Banyard Victoria
a Boston University School of Public Health , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
b University of New Hampshire, Prevention Innovations Research Center , Durham , New Hampshire , USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Aug-Sep;66(6):519-528. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431909. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Assess the efficacy of a college dating abuse (DA) prevention workshop.
85 students from Greek organizations.
Two fraternities and two sororities were randomized to intervention or waitlist control. Participants completed a baseline and 3-month follow-up survey. Data were analyzed using MANOVA.
As compared to those in the control group, students assigned to the DA workshop felt more prepared to act as bystanders at follow-up and were more convinced that DA was a problem on campus. Those who saw the workshop also recognized more opportunities when they could intervene as bystanders with friends and strangers at follow-up than did controls.
The DA workshop appears to have influenced students in the desired way, although not substantially. It is likely that a longer follow-up period and larger sample would reveal more meaningful changes from pre- to post-test.
评估一场大学约会暴力（DA）预防工作坊的效果。
85名来自希腊组织的学生。
两个兄弟会和两个姐妹会被随机分为干预组或等待名单对照组。参与者完成了基线调查和3个月后的随访调查。数据采用多变量方差分析进行分析。
与对照组相比，参加DA工作坊的学生在随访时感觉更有准备作为旁观者采取行动，并且更确信DA是校园中的一个问题。观看了工作坊的学生在随访时也比对照组认识到更多可以作为旁观者对朋友和陌生人进行干预的机会。
DA工作坊似乎以预期的方式影响了学生，尽管影响不大。较长的随访期和更大的样本量可能会揭示从测试前到测试后更有意义的变化。
