• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估“恋爱升级”项目对恋爱暴力预防的效果:一项针对美国海军水手的随机对照试验预研究。

Evaluation of the One Love Escalation Workshop for Dating Abuse Prevention: a Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study with a Sample of US Navy Sailors.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Boston University, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2021 Nov;22(8):1060-1070. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01240-9. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-021-01240-9
PMID:33855672
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Escalation Workshop with a sample of US Navy sailors. Escalation is a one-session workshop designed to promote bystander behavior related to dating abuse. We conducted a two-arm RCT with follow-up at 4 and 8 months. Participants were 335 Navy sailors, recruited from two comparable ships based in the USA. The unit of randomization was the ship. The primary outcomes were as follows: (a) attitudes related to intervening as a bystander in dating abuse situations, (b) injunctive norms about dating abuse, (c) dating abuse-related prevention-oriented behaviors (e.g., such as posting dating violence prevention messages online), and (d) bystander behaviors including acting as a bystander to prevent peer self-harm, peer bullying, peer intoxication, or peer dating abuse, or being a proactive bystander and initiating conversations about dating abuse prevention with friends and others. Hierarchal linear models (HLMs) indicated that, compared to participants in the control group, participants in the intervention group demonstrated improvement in attitudes [β = .09, p < .001] and had more engagement than controls in prevention-oriented behavior at 8-month follow-up [β = 0.11, p < .01]. Those in the intervention group also reported larger increases than controls in bystander behavior related to peer self-harm, peer bullying, peer intoxication, and starting conversations about dating abuse. Results for dating abuse bystander behavior were mixed. At 4 months, workshop participation was marginally associated with increased bystander behavior with peers who had perpetrated dating abuse (β = 0.89, p = 0.06) and with peers experiencing physical or sexual dating abuse, or stalking or threats (β = 1.11, p = .07). However, workshop participation was not associated with increased bystander behavior with peers experiencing only physical abuse. The Escalation Workshop may be a promising strategy to promote change in dating abuse-related attitudinal change and prevention-oriented behavior, and bystander behavior with peers related to self-harm, bullying, intoxication, and some aspects of dating abuse prevention.

摘要

本研究旨在评估升级工作坊对美国海军水手样本的疗效。升级工作坊是一个单次会议的工作坊,旨在促进与约会虐待有关的旁观者行为。我们进行了一项双臂 RCT,并在 4 个月和 8 个月进行了随访。参与者是 335 名来自美国两艘相似船只的海军水手。随机分组单位是船只。主要结果如下:(a) 在约会虐待情况下作为旁观者进行干预的态度,(b) 关于约会虐待的禁令规范,(c) 与约会虐待预防相关的行为(例如,在网上发布约会暴力预防信息),以及 (d) 旁观者行为,包括防止同伴自残、同伴欺凌、同伴醉酒或同伴约会虐待,或成为积极的旁观者,并与朋友和其他人就约会虐待预防进行对话。层次线性模型 (HLMs) 表明,与对照组参与者相比,干预组参与者在态度方面有所改善[β=0.09,p<0.001],并且在 8 个月的随访中比对照组更积极地参与预防性行为[β=0.11,p<0.01]。干预组参与者报告的同伴自我伤害、同伴欺凌、同伴醉酒和开始谈论约会虐待的旁观者行为的增加也大于对照组。关于同伴约会虐待行为的结果喜忧参半。在 4 个月时,工作坊的参与与同伴中实施约会虐待(β=0.89,p=0.06)以及与经历身体或性虐待、跟踪或威胁的同伴(β=1.11,p=0.07)的旁观者行为增加有关。然而,工作坊的参与与仅经历身体虐待的同伴的旁观者行为增加无关。升级工作坊可能是促进与约会虐待相关的态度改变和预防性行为以及与自我伤害、欺凌、醉酒和约会虐待预防某些方面有关的同伴行为改变的有前途的策略。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the One Love Escalation Workshop for Dating Abuse Prevention: a Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study with a Sample of US Navy Sailors.评估“恋爱升级”项目对恋爱暴力预防的效果:一项针对美国海军水手的随机对照试验预研究。
Prev Sci. 2021 Nov;22(8):1060-1070. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01240-9. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
One-year follow-up of a coach-delivered dating violence prevention program: a cluster randomized controlled trial.教练式传递的恋爱暴力预防项目的一年随访:一项群组随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.007.
3
Mapping a continuum of adolescent helping and bystander behavior within the context of dating violence and bullying.在恋爱暴力和欺凌的背景下描绘青少年援助和旁观者行为的连续体。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2018;88(3):335-345. doi: 10.1037/ort0000245. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus.大学校园里两项约会暴力预防项目的评估
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Dec;33(23):3630-3655. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636069. Epub 2016 Mar 13.
5
Middle School Effects of the Dating Matters® Comprehensive Teen Dating Violence Prevention Model on Physical Violence, Bullying, and Cyberbullying: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.《约会 Matters®综合青少年约会暴力预防模式对身体暴力、欺凌和网络欺凌的中学效果:一项集群随机对照试验》
Prev Sci. 2021 Feb;22(2):151-161. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01071-9.
6
Raising a Red Flag on Dating Violence: Evaluation of a Low-Resource, College-Based Bystander Behavior Intervention Program.对约会暴力拉响警报:对一个资源有限、以大学为基础的旁观者行为干预项目的评估。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Nov;33(22):3480-3501. doi: 10.1177/0886260516635322. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
7
Cyber Dating Abuse: Investigating Digital Monitoring Behaviors Among Adolescents From a Social Learning Perspective.网络约会暴力:从社会学习视角调查青少年的数字监控行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):5157-5178. doi: 10.1177/0886260517719538. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Efficacy of Bystander Programs to Prevent Dating Abuse Among Youth and Young Adults: A Review of the Literature.旁观者项目预防青年和年轻人约会暴力的效果:文献综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Jul;17(3):256-69. doi: 10.1177/1524838015584361. Epub 2015 May 6.
9
The escalation dating abuse workshop for college students: Results of an efficacy RCT.面向大学生的约会暴力升级问题工作坊:一项有效性随机对照试验的结果
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Aug-Sep;66(6):519-528. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431909. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Intervention to Educate College Students About Dating Violence and Bystander Responses.评估在线干预对大学生恋爱暴力和旁观者反应教育效果的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):NP7516-NP7546. doi: 10.1177/0886260519829769. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring nursing interventions in family-based approaches for preventing bullying among children and adolescents: a scoping review.探索基于家庭的方法中预防儿童和青少年欺凌行为的护理干预措施:一项范围综述。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 27;24(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03221-7.
2
Ninth Annual DC Public Health Case Challenge: Protective Community Environments and Their Contribution to Intimate Partner Violence Prevention: The Role of Youth.第九届年度华盛顿特区公共卫生案例挑战赛:保护性社区环境及其对预防亲密伴侣暴力的贡献:青年的作用
NAM Perspect. 2023 Sep 6;2023. doi: 10.31478/202309a. eCollection 2023.
3
Leveraging Faith Communities to Prevent Violence against Women: Lessons from the Implementation and Delivery of the Motivating Action through Empowerment (MATE) Program.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions of Community Norms and Youths' Reactive and Proactive Dating and Sexual Violence Bystander Action.社区规范认知与青少年反应性和主动性约会及性暴力旁观者行为。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;63(1-2):122-134. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12312. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
The escalation dating abuse workshop for college students: Results of an efficacy RCT.面向大学生的约会暴力升级问题工作坊:一项有效性随机对照试验的结果
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Aug-Sep;66(6):519-528. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431909. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
3
Evaluation of the Green Dot Bystander Intervention to Reduce Interpersonal Violence Among College Students Across Three Campuses.
利用信仰社区预防针对妇女的暴力行为:实施和提供赋权激励行动(MATE)计划的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15833. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315833.
评估“绿点旁观者干预计划”对三所大学校园里大学生人际暴力行为的减少效果。
Violence Against Women. 2015 Dec;21(12):1507-27. doi: 10.1177/1077801214545284. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
4
Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: a comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students.身体约会暴力、性暴力和不受欢迎的追求受害情况:性少数群体和异性恋大学生发生率的比较。
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Feb;30(4):580-600. doi: 10.1177/0886260514535260. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
5
One-year follow-up of a coach-delivered dating violence prevention program: a cluster randomized controlled trial.教练式传递的恋爱暴力预防项目的一年随访:一项群组随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.007.
6
Evaluation of Green Dot: an active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses.绿点评估:减少大学校园性暴力的积极旁观者干预。
Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):777-96. doi: 10.1177/1077801211410264. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
7
Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: the case of interpersonal violence.亲社会旁观者行为的测量及其相关因素:以人际暴力为例。
Violence Vict. 2008;23(1):83-97. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83.
8
Premilitary intimate partner violence and attrition from the U.S. Navy.入伍前亲密伴侣暴力与美国海军人员流失
Mil Med. 2006 Dec;171(12):1206-10. doi: 10.7205/milmed.171.12.1206.
9
Variables associated with intimate partner violence in a deploying military sample.在一个正在部署的军事样本中与亲密伴侣暴力相关的变量。
Mil Med. 2006 Jul;171(7):627-31. doi: 10.7205/milmed.171.7.627.
10
Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen.退伍军人和现役军人中的亲密伴侣暴力行为。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Nov;25(7):862-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.009.