Thomas Sajesh P, Spackman Peter R, Jayatilaka Dylan, Spackman Mark A
School of Molecular Sciences , University of Western Australia , Perth 6009 , Australia.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Mar 13;14(3):1614-1623. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01200. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
Using four different benchmark sets of molecular crystals, we establish the level of confidence for lattice energies estimated using CE-B3LYP model energies and experimental crystal structures. [ IUCrJ 2017 , 4 , 575 - 587 10.1107/S205225251700848X .] We conclude that they compare very well with available benchmark estimates derived from sublimation enthalpies, and in many cases they are comparable with, and sometimes better than, more computationally demanding approaches, such as those based on periodic DFT plus dispersion methodologies. The performance over the complete set of 110 crystals indicates a mean absolute deviation from benchmark energies of only 6.6 kJ mol. Applications to polymorphic crystals and larger molecules are also presented and critically discussed. The results highlight the importance of recognizing the consequences of different sets of crystal/molecule geometries when different methodologies are compared, as well as the need for more extensive benchmark sets of crystal structures and associated lattice energies.
使用四组不同的分子晶体基准集,我们确定了使用CE - B3LYP模型能量和实验晶体结构估算晶格能的置信水平。[《IUCrJ》2017年,第4卷,575 - 587页,doi:10.1107/S205225251700848X。]我们得出结论,它们与从升华焓得出的现有基准估算值相比非常出色,并且在许多情况下,它们与计算要求更高的方法(例如基于周期性密度泛函理论加色散方法的那些方法)相当,有时甚至更好。对110个晶体的完整集合的性能表明,与基准能量的平均绝对偏差仅为6.6 kJ/mol。还介绍并批判性地讨论了在多晶型晶体和更大分子中的应用。结果突出了在比较不同方法时认识到不同晶体/分子几何构型集的影响的重要性,以及对更广泛的晶体结构基准集和相关晶格能的需求。