Gjerde Hallvard, Clausen Grethe Brennhovd, Andreassen Espen, Furuhaugen Håvard
Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
Mobile Police Service, P.O. Box 100, NO-3291 Stavern, Norway.
J Anal Toxicol. 2018 May 1;42(4):248-254. doi: 10.1093/jat/bky003.
Reliable field testing devices for psychoactive drugs would be useful tools for the police for detecting drug-impaired drivers. The Norwegian Mobile Police Service (NMPS) started using Dräger DrugTest 5000 (DDT5000) in 2015 as an on-site screening instrument for drugs in samples of oral fluid. The aim of this study was to compare the results of field testing of DDT5000 with drug findings in blood and oral fluid samples taken from drivers suspected for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). In total, 369 drivers were included in this field testing; blood samples were obtained from all of them, while oral fluid samples were collected with the Intercept device from 301 of them. The median time from field testing with DDT5000 and collection of blood and oral fluid samples was 50 min. The proportions of false positive results with DDT5000 compared to findings in blood samples above the Norwegian legal per se limits were for cannabis 14.5%, amphetamine 23.2%, methamphetamine 38.4%, cocaine 87.1%, opiates 65.9% and benzodiazepines 36.4%. The proportions of false negatives were for cannabis 13.4%, amphetamine 4.9%, methamphetamine 6.1%, cocaine 0.0%, opiates 0.0% and benzodiazepines 18.8%. Among drivers who had drug concentrations above the legal limits in blood, the proportion who tested positive using DDT5000 was 82.9% for THC, 90.8% for amphetamine, 75.7% for methamphetamine, 100.0% for cocaine, 100.0% for opiates and 37.2% for benzodiazepines. In cases with false-positive DDT5000 results compared to blood, traces of drugs were most often found in oral fluid. The DDT5000 did not absolutely correctly identify DUID offenders due to fairly large proportions of false-positive or false-negative results compared to drug concentrations in blood. The police reported that DDT5000 was still a valuable tool in identifying possible DUID offenders, resulting in more than doubling the number of apprehended DUID offenders.
用于检测精神活性药物的可靠现场检测设备对警方检测受药物影响的驾驶员来说将是有用的工具。挪威流动警察局(NMPS)于2015年开始使用德尔格DrugTest 5000(DDT5000)作为口腔液样本中药物的现场筛查仪器。本研究的目的是比较DDT5000现场检测结果与从涉嫌药物影响下驾驶(DUID)的驾驶员采集的血液和口腔液样本中的药物检测结果。共有369名驾驶员参与了此次现场检测;所有驾驶员均采集了血液样本,其中301名驾驶员使用Intercept设备采集了口腔液样本。从使用DDT5000进行现场检测到采集血液和口腔液样本的中位时间为50分钟。与血液样本中高于挪威法定本身限量的检测结果相比,DDT5000的假阳性结果比例分别为:大麻14.5%、苯丙胺23.2%、甲基苯丙胺38.4%、可卡因87.1%、阿片类药物65.9%和苯二氮卓类药物36.4%。假阴性比例分别为:大麻13.4%、苯丙胺4.9%、甲基苯丙胺6.1%、可卡因0.0%、阿片类药物0.0%和苯二氮卓类药物18.8%。在血液中药物浓度高于法定限量的驾驶员中,使用DDT5000检测呈阳性的比例分别为:四氢大麻酚(THC)82.9%、苯丙胺90.8%、甲基苯丙胺75.7%、可卡因100.0%、阿片类药物100.0%和苯二氮卓类药物37.2%。与血液检测结果相比,在DDT5000结果为假阳性的案例中,口腔液中最常发现药物痕迹。由于与血液中的药物浓度相比,假阳性或假阴性结果比例相当大,DDT5000并不能绝对正确地识别DUID违法者。警方报告称,DDT5000在识别可能的DUID违法者方面仍然是一个有价值的工具,使得被捕的DUID违法者数量增加了一倍多。