Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Drug Test Anal. 2022 Jan;14(1):137-143. doi: 10.1002/dta.3153. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
Many jurisdictions use point-of-collection (POC) oral fluid testing devices to identify driving under the influence of cannabis, indexed by the presence of Δ -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), an intoxicating cannabinoid, in oral fluid. Although the use of the non-intoxicating cannabinoid, cannabidiol (CBD), is not prohibited among drivers, it is unclear whether these devices can reliably distinguish between CBD and THC, which have similar chemical structures. This study determined whether orally administered CBD produces false-positive tests for THC on standard, POC oral fluid testing devices. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, healthy participants (n = 17) completed four treatment sessions involving the administration of either placebo or 15-, 300- or 1500-mg pure CBD in a high-fat dietary supplement. Oral fluid was sampled, and the DrugWipe®-5S (DW-5S; 10 ng·ml THC cut-off) and Drug Test® 5000 (DT5000; 10 ng·mL THC cut-off) devices administered, at baseline (pretreatment) and ~20-, ~145- and ~185-min posttreatment. Oral fluid cannabinoid concentrations were measured using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) oral fluid CBD concentrations were highest at ~20 min, quantified as 0.4 (6.0), 15.8 (41.6) and 167 (233) ng·ml on the 15-, 300- and 1500-mg CBD treatments, respectively. THC, cannabinol and cannabigerol were not detected in any samples. A total of 259 DW-5S and 256 DT5000 tests were successfully completed, and no THC-positive tests were observed. Orally administered CBD does not appear to produce false-positive (or true-positive) tests for THC on the DW-5S and DT5000. The likelihood of an individual who is using a CBD (only) oral formulation being falsely accused of DUIC therefore appears low.
许多司法管辖区使用点收集(POC)口腔液测试设备来识别大麻的影响,其通过口腔液中 Δ-四氢大麻酚(THC)的存在来确定,THC 是一种致醉大麻素。尽管在驾驶员中使用非致醉大麻素大麻二酚(CBD)并不被禁止,但目前尚不清楚这些设备是否能够可靠地区分 CBD 和 THC,因为它们具有相似的化学结构。本研究旨在确定口服 CBD 是否会导致标准 POC 口腔液测试设备对 THC 产生假阳性测试结果。在一项随机、双盲、交叉设计的研究中,健康参与者(n=17)完成了四项治疗方案,分别涉及给予安慰剂或 15、300 或 1500mg 纯 CBD 高脂肪膳食补充剂。在基线(预处理)和治疗后约 20、145 和 185 分钟时采集口腔液,并使用 DrugWipe®-5S(DW-5S;10ng·ml THC 截止值)和 Drug Test® 5000(DT5000;10ng·ml THC 截止值)进行检测。使用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测量口腔液中的大麻素浓度。中位(四分位距 [IQR])口腔液 CBD 浓度在约 20 分钟时最高,分别为 15mg、300mg 和 1500mg CBD 治疗组的 0.4(6.0)、15.8(41.6)和 167(233)ng·ml。在任何样本中均未检测到 THC、大麻酚和大麻萜醇。共完成 259 次 DW-5S 和 256 次 DT5000 测试,均未观察到 THC 阳性测试结果。口服 CBD 似乎不会在 DW-5S 和 DT5000 上导致 THC 的假阳性(或真阳性)测试。因此,使用 CBD(仅)口腔制剂的个体被错误指控 DUI 的可能性似乎很低。