Bergman Hanna, Rathbone John, Agarwal Vivek, Soares-Weiser Karla
Cochrane Response, Cochrane, St Albans House, 57-59 Haymarket, London, UK, SW1Y 4QX.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD000459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000459.pub3.
Since the 1950s antipsychotic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have also been associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD) - a problem often seen as repetitive involuntary movements around the mouth and face. Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to antipsychotics. These strategies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies such as drug holidays, and antipsychotic cessation.
To determine whether a reduction or cessation of antipsychotic drugs is associated with a reduction in TD for people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) who have existing TD. Our secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific antipsychotics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for TD that was already established.
We updated previous searches of Cochrane Schizophrenia's study-based Register of Trials including the registers of clinical trials (16 July 2015 and 26 April 2017). We searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We also contacted authors of trials for additional information.
We included reports if they assessed people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses who had established antipsychotic-induced TD, and had been randomly allocated to (a) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic cessation (placebo or no intervention), (b) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic reduction (including intermittent strategies), (c) specific antipsychotics for the treatment of TD versus placebo or no intervention, and (d) specific antipsychotics versus other antipsychotics or versus any other drugs for the treatment of TD.
We independently extracted data from these trials and estimated risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assumed that people who dropped out had no improvement.
We included 13 RCTs with 711 participants; eight of these studies were newly included in this 2017 update. One trial is ongoing.There was low-quality evidence of a clear difference on no clinically important improvement in TD favouring switch to risperidone compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (1 RCT, 42 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.23 to 0.89, low-quality evidence). Because evidence was of very low quality for antipsychotic dose reduction versus antipsychotic maintenance (2 RCTs, 17 people, RR 0.42 95% CI 0.17 to 1.04, very low-quality evidence), and for switch to a new antipsychotic versus switch to another new antipsychotic (5 comparisons, 5 RCTs, 140 people, no meta-analysis, effects for all comparisons equivocal), we are uncertain about these effects. There was low-quality evidence of a significant difference on extrapyramidal symptoms: use of antiparkinsonism medication favouring switch to quetiapine compared with switch to haloperidol (1 RCT, 45 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.21 to 0.96, low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference for switch to risperidone or haloperidol compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (RR 1 RCT, 48 people, RR 2.08 95% CI 0.74 to 5.86, low-quality evidence) and switch to risperidone compared with switch to haloperidol (RR 1 RCT, 37 people, RR 0.68 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35, very low-quality evidence).Trials also reported on secondary outcomes such as other TD symptom outcomes, other adverse events outcomes, mental state, and leaving the study early, but the quality of the evidence for all these outcomes was very low due mainly to small sample sizes, very wide 95% CIs, and risk of bias. No trials reported on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks, or personalised quality of life, outcomes that we designated as being important to patients.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited data from small studies using antipsychotic reduction or specific antipsychotic drugs as treatments for TD did not provide any convincing evidence of the value of these approaches. There is a need for larger trials of a longer duration to fully investigate this area.
自20世纪50年代以来,抗精神病药物已被广泛用于治疗精神分裂症等慢性精神疾病患者。然而,这些药物也与一系列不良反应相关,包括运动障碍,如迟发性运动障碍(TD)——这一问题常表现为口面部周围反复出现的不自主运动。人们已经研究了各种策略来减少个体对抗精神病药物的累积暴露。这些策略包括减少剂量、间歇性给药策略(如药物假期)以及停用抗精神病药物。
确定对于已患有TD的精神分裂症(或其他慢性精神疾病)患者,减少或停用抗精神病药物是否与TD的减少相关。我们的次要目的是确定针对类似人群使用特定抗精神病药物是否可作为已确诊TD的一种治疗方法。
我们更新了之前对Cochrane精神分裂症基于研究的试验注册库的检索,包括临床试验注册库(2015年7月16日和2017年4月26日)。我们检索了所有已识别研究的参考文献以获取更多试验引用。我们还联系了试验作者以获取更多信息。
如果报告评估了患有抗精神病药物所致TD的精神分裂症或其他慢性精神疾病患者,且这些患者被随机分配至以下情况,我们则纳入该报告:(a)抗精神病药物维持治疗与停用抗精神病药物(安慰剂或无干预);(b)抗精神病药物维持治疗与减少抗精神病药物剂量(包括间歇性策略);(c)用于治疗TD的特定抗精神病药物与安慰剂或无干预;(d)用于治疗TD的特定抗精神病药物与其他抗精神病药物或与任何其他药物。
我们独立从这些试验中提取数据,并估计风险比(RR)或均值差(MD),以及95%置信区间(CI)。我们假设退出试验的患者无改善。
我们纳入了13项随机对照试验,共711名参与者;其中8项研究是在2017年更新中新增的。一项试验正在进行中。与停用抗精神病药物(使用安慰剂)相比,转用利培酮在TD方面无临床重要改善的差异存在低质量证据(1项随机对照试验,42人,RR 0.45,CI 0.23至0.89,低质量证据)。由于抗精神病药物剂量减少与抗精神病药物维持治疗的证据质量非常低(2项随机对照试验,17人,RR 0.42,95%CI 0.17至1.04,极低质量证据),以及转用一种新的抗精神病药物与转用另一种新的抗精神病药物的比较(5项比较,5项随机对照试验,140人,未进行荟萃分析,所有比较的效果均不明确),我们对这些效果不确定。在锥体外系症状方面存在低质量证据表明有显著差异:与转用氟哌啶醇相比,使用抗帕金森药物转用喹硫平更具优势(1项随机对照试验,45人,RR 0.45,CI 0.21至0.96,低质量证据)。与停用抗精神病药物(使用安慰剂)相比,转用利培酮或氟哌啶醇无差异(1项随机对照试验,48人,RR 2.08,95%CI 0.74至5.86,低质量证据),与转用氟哌啶醇相比,转用利培酮也无差异(1项随机对照试验,37人,RR 0.68,95%CI 0.34至1.35,极低质量证据)。试验还报告了次要结局,如其他TD症状结局、其他不良事件结局、精神状态以及提前退出研究情况,但所有这些结局的证据质量都非常低,主要原因是样本量小、95%CI非常宽以及存在偏倚风险。没有试验报告社会信心、社会融入、社会网络或个性化生活质量等我们认为对患者很重要的结局。
使用减少抗精神病药物剂量或特定抗精神病药物治疗TD的小型研究数据有限,未提供这些方法有价值的任何令人信服的证据。需要进行更大规模、持续时间更长的试验来充分研究这一领域。