• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作鞋防滑性能测试。

Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 302 Benedum Hall, 3700 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2018 Apr;68:304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.008
PMID:29409649
Abstract

The variability in friction and slip propensity across slip resistant (SR) shoes is poorly understood. This study aimed to quantify the impact of shoe design features on the available coefficient of friction (ACOF) across shoes labeled as SR. Differences in ACOF and the slipping rate across SR shoes were also quantified. Twelve shoes were tested across five types of flooring and three contaminant conditions using a whole shoe mechanical slip tester. Geometric and hardness parameters were measured to determine the effect of heel outsole design on ACOF. The rate of slipping was evaluated for three of the shoes on vinyl tile with canola oil using human subjects. Differences in ACOF were significant across shoe outsole designs (p < .001). ACOF was correlated with geometrical and hardness parameters. Rate of slipping was lower for the highest ACOF shoe (p < .001). This information can be used to guide SR shoe selection and design.

摘要

防滑(SR)鞋之间的摩擦力和滑动倾向差异很大,但目前对此了解甚少。本研究旨在定量分析鞋类设计特征对标注为 SR 的鞋子的有效摩擦系数(ACOF)的影响。同时,还对 SR 鞋之间的 ACOF 和滑动率差异进行了量化。使用全鞋机械滑动测试仪,在五种地板类型和三种污染条件下对 12 种鞋子进行了测试。测量了几何和硬度参数,以确定鞋跟外底设计对 ACOF 的影响。在使用菜籽油的乙烯基地板上,对其中三双鞋的滑动率进行了人体受试者评估。鞋底设计不同的鞋子之间的 ACOF 差异具有统计学意义(p <.001)。ACOF 与几何和硬度参数相关。ACOF 最高的鞋子的滑动率更低(p <.001)。这些信息可用于指导 SR 鞋的选择和设计。

相似文献

1
Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant.工作鞋防滑性能测试。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Apr;68:304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
2
Prediction of coefficient of friction based on footwear outsole features.基于鞋底特征预测摩擦系数。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102963. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102963. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
In contrast to slip-resistant shoes, fluid drainage capacity explains friction performance across shoes that are not slip-resistant.与防滑鞋不同,流体排水能力解释了不防滑的鞋子的摩擦性能。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Apr;100:103663. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103663. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
Changes in under-shoe traction and fluid drainage for progressively worn shoe tread.鞋底牵引力和鞋底磨损时的流体排水的变化。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 15.
5
Coefficient of friction testing parameters influence the prediction of human slips.摩擦系数测试参数会影响对人体滑倒的预测。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
Worn region size of shoe outsole impacts human slips: Testing a mechanistic model.鞋底磨损区域的大小会影响人类滑倒:验证一个机械模型。
J Biomech. 2020 May 22;105:109797. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109797. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions.基于 STM 603 整体鞋类摩擦试验机在不同摩擦系数测试条件下预测滑倒。
Ergonomics. 2019 May;62(5):668-681. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1567828. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
8
Kinematics and kinetics of the shoe during human slips.人类滑倒过程中鞋子的运动学与动力学
J Biomech. 2018 Jun 6;74:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
9
Prospective validity assessment of a friction prediction model based on tread outsole features of slip-resistant shoes.基于防滑鞋胎面外底特征的摩擦预测模型的前瞻性有效性评估。
Appl Ergon. 2024 Jan;114:104110. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104110. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
10
Differences in Friction Performance between New and Worn Shoes.新鞋与旧鞋之间的摩擦性能差异。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2020 Oct-Dec;8(4):209-214. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2021.1925998. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The need for better metrics for floor-tile topography: Conventional metrics correlate only modestly with shoe-floor friction.对更好的地砖表面形貌测量指标的需求:传统测量指标与鞋底-地面摩擦力的相关性仅为中等程度。
Tribol Int. 2024 May;193. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2024.109366.
2
Construction industry workers' compensation injury claims due to slips, trips, and falls - Ohio, 2010-2017.2010-2017 年俄亥俄州因滑倒、绊倒和坠落导致建筑工人赔偿伤害索赔。
J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
3
Validation of a portable shoe tread scanner to predict slip risk.
验证一种便携式鞋底扫描仪预测滑倒风险的能力。
J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 May 27.
4
Effects of natural shoe wear on traction performance: a longitudinal study.自然鞋类磨损对牵引性能的影响:一项纵向研究。
Footwear Sci. 2022;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/19424280.2021.1994022. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Prospective validity assessment of a friction prediction model based on tread outsole features of slip-resistant shoes.基于防滑鞋胎面外底特征的摩擦预测模型的前瞻性有效性评估。
Appl Ergon. 2024 Jan;114:104110. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104110. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
6
Computational Model of Shoe Wear Progression: Comparison with Experimental Results.鞋类磨损进展的计算模型:与实验结果的比较
Wear. 2019 Mar 15;422-423:235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.070.
7
Gait kinetics impact shoe tread wear rate.步态动力学影响鞋底的磨损率。
Gait Posture. 2021 May;86:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Traction performance across the life of slip-resistant footwear: Preliminary results from a longitudinal study.防滑鞋在整个使用寿命内的牵引力性能:一项纵向研究的初步结果。
J Safety Res. 2020 Sep;74:219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
Vinyl Composite Tile Surrogate for Mechanical Slip Testing.用于机械防滑测试的乙烯基复合瓷砖替代品
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2019;7(2):132-141. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2019.1637381. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
10
An observational ergonomic tool for assessing the worn condition of slip-resistant shoes.一种用于评估防滑鞋磨损状况的观察性人体工效学工具。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103140. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103140. Epub 2020 May 20.