Iraqi Arian, Cham Rakié, Redfern Mark S, Vidic Natasa S, Beschorner Kurt E
Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Benedum Engineering Hall #302, 3700 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Benedum Engineering Hall #1025, 3700 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
J Biomech. 2018 Jun 6;74:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
This paper quantified the heel kinematics and kinetics during human slips with the goal of guiding available coefficient of friction (ACOF) testing methods for footwear and flooring. These values were then compared to the testing parameters recommended for measuring shoe-floor ACOF. Kinematic and kinetic data of thirty-nine subjects who experienced a slip incident were pooled from four similar human slipping studies for this secondary analysis. Vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), center of pressure (COP), shoe-floor angle, side-slip angle, sliding speed and contact time were quantified at slip start (SS) and at the time of peak sliding speed (PSS). Statistical comparisons were used to test if any discrepancies exist between the state of slipping foot and current ACOF testing parameters. The main findings were that the VGRF (26.7 %BW, 179.4 N), shoe-floor angle (22.1°) and contact time (0.02 s) at SS were significantly different from the recommended ACOF testing parameters. Instead, the testing parameters are mostly consistent with the state of the shoe at PSS. We argue that changing the footwear testing parameters to conditions at SS is more appropriate for relating ACOF to conditions of actual slips, including lower vertical forces, larger shoe-floor angles and shorter contact duration.
本文对人体滑倒过程中的足跟运动学和动力学进行了量化,目的是指导鞋类和地板的有效摩擦系数(ACOF)测试方法。然后将这些值与测量鞋底与地面ACOF推荐的测试参数进行比较。从四项类似的人体滑倒研究中汇总了39名经历滑倒事件的受试者的运动学和动力学数据,用于本次二次分析。在滑倒开始(SS)和最大滑动速度时刻(PSS)对垂直地面反作用力(VGRF)、压力中心(COP)、鞋底与地面角度、侧滑角、滑动速度和接触时间进行了量化。采用统计比较来检验滑倒脚的状态与当前ACOF测试参数之间是否存在差异。主要发现是,SS时的VGRF(26.7%体重,179.4 N)、鞋底与地面角度(22.1°)和接触时间(0.02 s)与推荐的ACOF测试参数有显著差异。相反,测试参数大多与PSS时鞋子的状态一致。我们认为,将鞋类测试参数改为SS时的条件更适合将ACOF与实际滑倒条件联系起来,包括更低的垂直力、更大的鞋底与地面角度和更短的接触持续时间。