Suppr超能文献

人类滑倒过程中鞋子的运动学与动力学

Kinematics and kinetics of the shoe during human slips.

作者信息

Iraqi Arian, Cham Rakié, Redfern Mark S, Vidic Natasa S, Beschorner Kurt E

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Benedum Engineering Hall #302, 3700 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Benedum Engineering Hall #1025, 3700 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2018 Jun 6;74:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

Abstract

This paper quantified the heel kinematics and kinetics during human slips with the goal of guiding available coefficient of friction (ACOF) testing methods for footwear and flooring. These values were then compared to the testing parameters recommended for measuring shoe-floor ACOF. Kinematic and kinetic data of thirty-nine subjects who experienced a slip incident were pooled from four similar human slipping studies for this secondary analysis. Vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), center of pressure (COP), shoe-floor angle, side-slip angle, sliding speed and contact time were quantified at slip start (SS) and at the time of peak sliding speed (PSS). Statistical comparisons were used to test if any discrepancies exist between the state of slipping foot and current ACOF testing parameters. The main findings were that the VGRF (26.7 %BW, 179.4 N), shoe-floor angle (22.1°) and contact time (0.02 s) at SS were significantly different from the recommended ACOF testing parameters. Instead, the testing parameters are mostly consistent with the state of the shoe at PSS. We argue that changing the footwear testing parameters to conditions at SS is more appropriate for relating ACOF to conditions of actual slips, including lower vertical forces, larger shoe-floor angles and shorter contact duration.

摘要

本文对人体滑倒过程中的足跟运动学和动力学进行了量化,目的是指导鞋类和地板的有效摩擦系数(ACOF)测试方法。然后将这些值与测量鞋底与地面ACOF推荐的测试参数进行比较。从四项类似的人体滑倒研究中汇总了39名经历滑倒事件的受试者的运动学和动力学数据,用于本次二次分析。在滑倒开始(SS)和最大滑动速度时刻(PSS)对垂直地面反作用力(VGRF)、压力中心(COP)、鞋底与地面角度、侧滑角、滑动速度和接触时间进行了量化。采用统计比较来检验滑倒脚的状态与当前ACOF测试参数之间是否存在差异。主要发现是,SS时的VGRF(26.7%体重,179.4 N)、鞋底与地面角度(22.1°)和接触时间(0.02 s)与推荐的ACOF测试参数有显著差异。相反,测试参数大多与PSS时鞋子的状态一致。我们认为,将鞋类测试参数改为SS时的条件更适合将ACOF与实际滑倒条件联系起来,包括更低的垂直力、更大的鞋底与地面角度和更短的接触持续时间。

相似文献

1
Kinematics and kinetics of the shoe during human slips.人类滑倒过程中鞋子的运动学与动力学
J Biomech. 2018 Jun 6;74:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant.工作鞋防滑性能测试。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Apr;68:304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
6
Prediction of coefficient of friction based on footwear outsole features.基于鞋底特征预测摩擦系数。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102963. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102963. Epub 2019 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

5
Gait kinetics impact shoe tread wear rate.步态动力学影响鞋底的磨损率。
Gait Posture. 2021 May;86:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Bioinspired kirigami metasurfaces as assistive shoe grips.受生物启发的剪纸型超表面作为辅助鞋钉。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Aug;4(8):778-786. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-0564-3. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
10
Generalizability of Footwear Traction Performance across Flooring and Contaminant Conditions.不同地面和污染物条件下鞋类防滑性能的可推广性
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2018;6(2):98-108. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2018.1517702. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

2
Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant.工作鞋防滑性能测试。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Apr;68:304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
3
Slip initiation in alternative and slip-resistant footwear.替代鞋类和防滑鞋类中的滑倒起始
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017 Dec;23(4):558-569. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1262498. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验