Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6GH, UK.
Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 6620 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Drug Saf. 2018 May;41(5):489-509. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0636-9.
Interleukin-13 and interleukin-4 are type-II cytokines signalling through the shared type II interleukin-4 receptor. As a result of their structural similarity, interleukin-13 and interleukin-4 have overlapping functions in the mediation of type-II-driven diseases and are, therefore, promising targets of biologic drugs currently in development for the treatment of such diseases, including asthma and atopic dermatitis.
This systematic review was conducted to assess preclinical evidence of potential safety concerns related to blockade of interleukin-13 alone or interleukin-13 and interleukin-4 in combination.
We specifically examined risks related to infection, malignancy and the cardiovascular system. We systematically searched the BIOSIS, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify preclinical studies published between January 2006 and October 2016 that addressed the effects of interleukin-13/interleukin-4 blockade and modulation on the risk of infection, malignancy and cardiovascular events. To provide a clinical context, we also performed a search for clinical trials targeting the interleukin-13/interleukin-4 pathways. Relevant data from preclinical and clinical trials were abstracted and presented descriptively.
Aside from expected evidence that inhibition of interleukin-13 and interleukin-4 impaired host responses to helminth infections, we did not identify other preclinical evidence suggesting safety risks relating to infection, malignancy or cardiovascular events. We found no evidence in clinical trials suggesting serious safety concerns, i.e. increased risk for infections, malignancy or cardiovascular events from therapeutic modulation of the interleukin-13 pathway alone or the combined interleukin-13/interleukin-4 pathways.
Although our findings are reassuring, long-term safety assessments of biologics that target the interleukin-13/interleukin-4 pathways currently in clinical development are needed.
白细胞介素-13 和白细胞介素-4 是通过共享的 II 型白细胞介素-4 受体传递信号的 II 型细胞因子。由于它们的结构相似,白细胞介素-13 和白细胞介素-4 在介导 II 型驱动的疾病方面具有重叠的功能,因此是目前正在开发用于治疗此类疾病的生物药物的有前途的靶点,包括哮喘和特应性皮炎。
本系统评价旨在评估单独阻断白细胞介素-13 或白细胞介素-13 和白细胞介素-4 联合阻断的潜在安全性问题的临床前证据。
我们专门检查了与感染、恶性肿瘤和心血管系统相关的风险。我们系统地搜索了 BIOSIS、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库,以确定 2006 年 1 月至 2016 年 10 月期间发表的探讨白细胞介素-13/白细胞介素-4 阻断和调节对感染、恶性肿瘤和心血管事件风险影响的临床前研究。为提供临床背景,我们还对针对白细胞介素-13/白细胞介素-4 途径的临床试验进行了搜索。从临床前和临床试验中提取并描述性地呈现了相关数据。
除了抑制白细胞介素-13 和白细胞介素-4 会损害宿主对寄生虫感染的反应的预期证据外,我们没有发现其他临床前证据表明与感染、恶性肿瘤或心血管事件相关的安全性风险。我们在临床试验中没有发现任何证据表明单独治疗性调节白细胞介素-13 途径或联合调节白细胞介素-13/白细胞介素-4 途径会导致严重的安全性问题,例如感染、恶性肿瘤或心血管事件的风险增加。
尽管我们的研究结果令人欣慰,但仍需要对目前正在临床开发中针对白细胞介素-13/白细胞介素-4 途径的生物制剂进行长期安全性评估。