• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的选择方法,以增加 CVD 预防策略的健康获益。

A new selection method to increase the health benefits of CVD prevention strategies.

机构信息

1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

2 Netherlands Heart Institute, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Apr;25(6):642-650. doi: 10.1177/2047487317752948. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1177/2047487317752948
PMID:29411690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5946653/
Abstract

Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention is commonly focused on providing individuals at high predicted CVD risk with preventive medication. Whereas CVD risk increases rapidly with age, current risk-based selection of individuals mainly targets the elderly. However, the lifelong (preventable) consequences of CVD events may be larger in younger individuals. The purpose of this paper is to investigate if health benefits from preventive treatment may increase when the selection strategy is further optimised. Methods Data from three Dutch cohorts were combined ( n = 47469, men:women 1:1.92) and classified into subgroups based on age and gender. The Framingham global risk score was used to estimate 10-year CVD risk. The associated lifelong burden of CVD events according to this 10-year CVD risk was expressed as quality-adjusted life years lost. Based on this approach, the additional health benefits from preventive treatment, reducing this 10-year CVD risk, from selecting individuals based on their expected CVD burden rather than their expected CVD risk were estimated. These benefits were expressed as quality-adjusted life years gained over lifetime. Results When using the current selection strategy (10% risk threshold), 32% of the individuals were selected for preventive treatment. When the same proportion was selected based on burden, more younger and fewer older individuals would receive treatment. Across all individuals, the gain in quality-adjusted life years was 217 between the two strategies, over a 10-year time horizon. In addition, when combining the strategies 5% extra eligible individuals were selected resulting in a gain of 628 quality-adjusted life years. Conclusion Improvement of the selection approach of individuals can help to reduce further the CVD burden. Selecting individuals for preventive treatment based on their expected CVD burden will provide more younger and fewer older individuals with treatment, and will reduce the overall CVD burden.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病(CVD)的预防通常侧重于为高预测 CVD 风险的个体提供预防性药物。虽然 CVD 风险随着年龄的增长而迅速增加,但目前基于风险的个体选择主要针对老年人。然而,CVD 事件的终身(可预防)后果在年轻人中可能更大。本文旨在研究当选择策略进一步优化时,预防性治疗的健康益处是否会增加。

方法

合并了来自三个荷兰队列的数据(n=47469,男女比例为 1:1.92),并根据年龄和性别将其分为亚组。使用 Framingham 全球风险评分估计 10 年 CVD 风险。根据该 10 年 CVD 风险,CVD 事件的终身负担表示为丧失的质量调整生命年。基于这种方法,从基于个体预期 CVD 负担而不是预期 CVD 风险选择个体的角度,估计了预防治疗降低这 10 年 CVD 风险所带来的额外健康益处。这些益处表示为终生获得的质量调整生命年。

结果

当使用当前的选择策略(10%风险阈值)时,32%的个体被选择进行预防性治疗。当根据负担选择相同比例时,更多的年轻个体和更少的老年个体将接受治疗。在所有个体中,两种策略之间的质量调整生命年增加了 217 年,时间范围为 10 年。此外,当结合这两种策略时,额外选择了 5%的合格个体,导致质量调整生命年增加了 628 年。

结论

改进个体选择方法可以帮助进一步降低 CVD 负担。根据预期 CVD 负担选择个体进行预防性治疗将为更多的年轻个体和更少的老年个体提供治疗,并降低整体 CVD 负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e8/5946653/ff98a7cd2a79/10.1177_2047487317752948-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e8/5946653/ff98a7cd2a79/10.1177_2047487317752948-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e8/5946653/ff98a7cd2a79/10.1177_2047487317752948-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A new selection method to increase the health benefits of CVD prevention strategies.一种新的选择方法,以增加 CVD 预防策略的健康获益。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Apr;25(6):642-650. doi: 10.1177/2047487317752948. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
[Effectiveness of different screening strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in a rural northern Chinese population].[中国北方农村人群心血管疾病一级预防中不同筛查策略的有效性]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Jun 18;50(3):443-449.
3
Predicted burden could replace predicted risk in preventive strategies for cardiovascular disease.预测负担可能取代预测风险,成为心血管疾病预防策略的依据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;93:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
4
Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.阿司匹林用于心血管疾病和结直肠癌的一级预防:美国预防服务工作组的决策分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):777-86. doi: 10.7326/M15-2129. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
5
Cost-effectiveness of medical primary prevention strategies to reduce absolute risk of cardiovascular disease in Tanzania: a Markov modelling study.坦桑尼亚降低心血管疾病绝对风险的初级医疗预防策略的成本效益:一项马尔可夫模型研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 17;16:185. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1409-3.
6
Cost effectiveness of case-finding strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a modelling study.心血管疾病一级预防病例发现策略的成本效益:一项建模研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan;67(654):e67-e77. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687973. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
7
Results of a Markov model analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Korea: the Korean Individual-Microsimulation Model for Cardiovascular Health Interventions.韩国心血管健康干预个体化微观模拟模型评估韩国人群进行心血管疾病一级预防应用他汀类药物治疗的成本效果分析结果
Clin Ther. 2009 Dec;31(12):2919-30; discussion 2916-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.013.
8
Economic evaluation of primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in mild hypertension: a scenario analysis for the Netherlands.轻度高血压患者心血管疾病一级预防的经济学评估:荷兰的情景分析
Clin Ther. 2014 Mar 1;36(3):368-84.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
9
Cost-effectiveness of aspirin treatment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease events in subgroups based on age, gender, and varying cardiovascular risk.基于年龄、性别和不同心血管风险的亚组中阿司匹林治疗在心血管疾病事件一级预防中的成本效益。
Circulation. 2008 Jun 3;117(22):2875-83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735340. Epub 2008 May 27.
10
Who needs laboratories and who needs statins?: comparative and cost-effectiveness analyses of non-laboratory-based, laboratory-based, and staged primary cardiovascular disease screening guidelines.谁需要实验室检查,谁需要他汀类药物?:基于非实验室检查、基于实验室检查以及分阶段的原发性心血管疾病筛查指南的比较与成本效益分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jan;7(1):25-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000397. Epub 2014 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Educational intervention based on the Extended Parallel Process Model in promoting preventive behaviors of arteriosclerosis in female high-school students.基于扩展平行过程模型的教育干预对促进女高中生动脉硬化预防行为的作用
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Mar 28;14:111. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1813_23. eCollection 2025.
2
The cost-effectiveness of a uniform versus age-based threshold for one-off screening for prevention of cardiovascular disease.一次性心血管疾病预防筛查采用统一标准与基于年龄标准的成本效益比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Sep;24(7):1033-1045. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01533-y. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Elevated risk thresholds predict endocrine risk-reducing medication use in the Athena screening registry.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex differences in coronary heart disease and stroke mortality: a global assessment of the effect of ageing between 1980 and 2010.冠心病和中风死亡率的性别差异:1980年至2010年间衰老影响的全球评估。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Mar 27;2(2):e000298. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000298. eCollection 2017.
2
Effect of Statin Treatment vs Usual Care on Primary Cardiovascular Prevention Among Older Adults: The ALLHAT-LLT Randomized Clinical Trial.他汀类药物治疗与常规治疗对老年人原发性心血管预防的影响:ALLHAT-LLT随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):955-965. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1442.
3
Global progress in prevention of cardiovascular disease.
在雅典娜筛查登记处,较高的风险阈值预示着内分泌风险降低药物的使用。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Aug 3;7(1):102. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00306-9.
4
Risk Perception & Risk-Reduction Behavior Model for Blue-Collar Workers: Adapted From the Health Promotion Model.蓝领工人的风险感知与风险降低行为模型:改编自健康促进模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 4;11:538198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538198. eCollection 2020.
5
Hesperidin supplementation has no effect on blood glucose control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.补充橙皮苷对血糖控制无影响:一项随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;86(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14120. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
全球在心血管疾病预防方面取得的进展。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S32-S38. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.06.
4
Using the Payoff Time in Decision-Analytic Models: A Case Study for Using Statins in Primary Prevention.使用决策分析模型中的回报期:在初级预防中使用他汀类药物的案例研究。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Oct;37(7):759-769. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17700846. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
5
Time to improve statin prescription guidelines in low-risk patients?是时候改进低风险患者的他汀类药物处方指南了吗?
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jul;24(10):1064-1070. doi: 10.1177/2047487317698585. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
6
Distribution of Estimated 10-Year Risk of Recurrent Vascular Events and Residual Risk in a Secondary Prevention Population.预估复发性血管事件 10 年风险的分布和二级预防人群中的残余风险。
Circulation. 2016 Nov 8;134(19):1419-1429. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021314. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).2016年欧洲临床实践心血管疾病预防指南:欧洲心脏病学会及其他学会心血管疾病预防临床实践联合工作组第六版(由10个学会的代表及特邀专家组成):由欧洲心血管预防与康复协会(EACPR)提供特别贡献制定而成。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(11):NP1-NP96. doi: 10.1177/2047487316653709. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.阿司匹林用于心血管疾病和结直肠癌的一级预防:美国预防服务工作组的决策分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):777-86. doi: 10.7326/M15-2129. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
9
Healthy lifestyle and heart rate variability in young adults.年轻人的健康生活方式与心率变异性
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(10):1037-44. doi: 10.1177/2047487315623708. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
10
Patient selection for cardiac surgery: Time to consider subgroups within risk categories?心脏手术的患者选择:是时候考虑风险类别中的亚组了吗?
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;203:1103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.034. Epub 2015 Nov 6.