• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 AlphaBay 市场竞争和供应商的规模与范围。

Assessing market competition and vendors' size and scope on AlphaBay.

机构信息

School of Criminology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, H3C 3J7, Canada; International Centre for Comparative Criminology (ICCC), Canada.

School of Criminology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, H3C 3J7, Canada; International Centre for Comparative Criminology (ICCC), Canada.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Apr;54:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.003
PMID:29414490
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2011, drug market participants have traded illegal drugs through cryptomarkets, a user-friendly infrastructure in which drug market participants can conduct business transactions. This study assesses market competition and the size and scope of drug vendors' activities on one of the largest cryptomarkets, AlphaBay, in order to better understand the challenges that drug vendors face when selling on this venue.

METHODS

Relying on data collected from AlphaBay, we calculate the degree of competition within the drug market using the Herfindhal-Hirshmann Index (HHI). We then follow a micro analytical approach and assess the size and scope of vendors' accounts. This is done by evaluating each vendor's market share over time using a group-based trajectory model (GBTM). Results from the GBTM are then used to assess vendors' exposure, diversity and experience based on their selling position in the market.

RESULTS

The HHI scores demonstrate that cryptomarkets offer a highly competitive environment that fits in a top-heavy market structure. However, the distribution of vendors' market share trajectories shows that only a small portion of vendors (referred to as high-level vendors) succeed in generating regular sales, whereas the majority of vendors are relegated to being mere market spectators with almost zero sales. This inequality is exacerbated by the aggressive advertising of high-level vendors who post many listings. Overall, product diversity and experience is limited for all market participants regardless of their level of success. We interpret these results through Reuter's work on traditional illegal markets, e-commerce studies and the growing field of cryptomarket research.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, while offering a new venue for illegal drug transactions, in many ways, the economics of cryptomarkets for drug dealing are consistent with Reuter's classic assessment of illegal markets and the consequences of product illegality that underlie it. Cryptomarkets conflicting features, a relatively open setting with relatively high barriers to entry and sales, shape the competitive, yet top-heavy market that emerges from our analysis. This creates a challenging environment for cryptomarket drug dealers.

摘要

背景

自 2011 年以来,毒品市场参与者通过加密货币市场进行非法毒品交易,这是一个用户友好的基础设施,毒品市场参与者可以在其中进行商业交易。本研究评估了最大的加密货币市场之一 AlphaBay 上的市场竞争以及毒品供应商活动的规模和范围,以便更好地了解毒品供应商在该场所销售时所面临的挑战。

方法

我们依赖于从 AlphaBay 收集的数据,使用赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI) 计算毒品市场内的竞争程度。然后,我们采用微观分析方法评估供应商账户的规模和范围。这是通过使用基于群组的轨迹模型 (GBTM) 随时间评估每个供应商的市场份额来完成的。然后,使用 GBTM 的结果根据供应商在市场中的销售地位评估他们的暴露度、多样性和经验。

结果

HHI 得分表明,加密货币市场提供了一个竞争激烈的环境,适合于头重脚轻的市场结构。然而,供应商市场份额轨迹的分布表明,只有一小部分供应商(称为高级供应商)成功地产生了定期销售,而大多数供应商则沦为几乎没有销售的市场旁观者。高级供应商的积极广告加剧了这种不平等,他们发布了许多列表。总的来说,无论其成功程度如何,所有市场参与者的产品多样性和经验都受到限制。我们通过 Reuter 关于传统非法市场、电子商务研究和加密货币市场研究领域的工作来解释这些结果。

结论

我们的结论是,虽然为非法毒品交易提供了一个新的场所,但在许多方面,加密货币市场的毒品交易经济学与 Reuter 对非法市场的经典评估以及非法性产品背后的后果是一致的。加密货币市场的冲突特征,即相对开放的环境和相对较高的进入和销售壁垒,塑造了我们分析得出的竞争激烈但头重脚轻的市场。这为加密货币市场的毒品交易商创造了一个具有挑战性的环境。

相似文献

1
Assessing market competition and vendors' size and scope on AlphaBay.评估 AlphaBay 市场竞争和供应商的规模与范围。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Apr;54:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
2
Comparing cryptomarkets for drugs. A characterisation of sellers and buyers over time.比较毒品的加密市场。对卖家和买家随时间的特征描述。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jun;56:176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
Hidden wholesale: The drug diffusing capacity of online drug cryptomarkets.隐蔽的批发:在线药品暗市的药物扩散能力
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Sep;35:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 May 6.
4
Delivery dilemmas: How drug cryptomarket users identify and seek to reduce their risk of detection by law enforcement.交付困境:毒品暗网市场用户如何识别并试图降低被执法部门发现的风险。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Mar;41:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.010. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
5
New psychoactive substances (NPS) on cryptomarket fora: An exploratory study of characteristics of forum activity between NPS buyers and vendors.暗网市场上的新型精神活性物质(NPS):对NPS买家和卖家之间论坛活动特征的探索性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Feb;40:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
6
Going international? Risk taking by cryptomarket drug vendors.走向国际?加密市场药品供应商的冒险行为。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Sep;35:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
7
Reputation transferability across contexts: Maintaining cooperation among anonymous cryptomarket actors when moving between markets.声誉在不同情境下的可转移性:在不同市场间转换时维持匿名加密市场参与者之间的合作。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb;76:102635. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102635. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
8
Safer scoring? Cryptomarkets, social supply and drug market violence.更安全的评分?加密市场、社会供应与毒品市场暴力。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Sep;35:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 May 6.
9
Forensic drug intelligence and the rise of cryptomarkets. Part II: Combination of data from the physical and virtual markets.法医毒品情报与加密市场的兴起。第二部分:实体市场与虚拟市场数据的结合。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jul;288:201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 8.
10
The transparency paradox. Building trust, resolving disputes and optimising logistics on conventional and online drugs markets.透明度悖论:在传统和在线药品市场建立信任、解决争端及优化物流
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Sep;35:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of strength and adulteration between illicit drugs obtained from cryptomarkets versus off-line.从隐秘市场获取的非法药物与线下非法药物在强度和掺假方面的比较。
Addiction. 2025 Jan;120(1):128-137. doi: 10.1111/add.16665. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Criminal clickbait: a panel data analysis on the attractiveness of online advertisements offering stolen data.犯罪诱饵:关于提供被盗数据的在线广告吸引力的面板数据分析
Front Big Data. 2023 Dec 22;6:1320569. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1320569. eCollection 2023.
3
The success rate of online illicit drug transactions during a global pandemic.
在全球大流行期间,网上非法毒品交易的成功率。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jan;99:103452. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103452. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.国际刑警组织2016 - 2019年受管制物质审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 May 24;2:608-669. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.019. eCollection 2020.
5
Preliminary findings of the impact of COVID-19 on drugs crypto markets.COVID-19 对毒品加密市场影响的初步调查结果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Sep;83:102870. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102870. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Nonmedical prescription psychiatric drug use and the darknet: A cryptomarket analysis.非医疗处方精神药物使用与暗网:一个加密市场分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Effect of restricting the legal supply of prescription opioids on buying through online illicit marketplaces: interrupted time series analysis.限制处方类阿片合法供应对通过网上黑市购买的影响:中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:k2270. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2270.