Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, UK.
Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, UK.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S609-S618. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.011.
Appropriate standards for the assessment of fetal growth and birthweight are central to good clinical care, and have become even more important with increasing evidence that growth-related adverse outcomes are potentially avoidable. Standards need to be evidence based and validated against pregnancy outcome and able to demonstrate utility and effectiveness. A review of proposals by the Intergrowth consortium to adopt their single international standard finds little support for the claim that the cases that it identifies as small are due to malnutrition or stunting, and substantial evidence that there is normal physiologic variation between different countries and ethnic groups. It is possible that the one-size-fits-all standard ends up fitting no one and could be harmful if implemented. An alternative is the concept of country-specific charts that can improve the association between abnormal growth and adverse outcome. However, such standards ignore individual physiologic variation that affects fetal growth, which exists in any heterogeneous population and exceeds intercountry differences. It is therefore more logical to adjust for the characteristics of each mother, taking her ethnic origin and her height, weight, and parity into account, and to set a growth and birthweight standard for each pregnancy against which actual growth can be assessed. A customized standard better reflects adverse pregnancy outcome at both ends of the fetal size spectrum and has increased clinicians' confidence in growth assessment, while providing reassurance when abnormal size merely represents physiologic variation. Rollout in the United Kingdom has proceeded as part of the comprehensive Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP), and has resulted in a steady increase in antenatal detection of babies who are at risk because of fetal growth restriction. This in turn has been accompanied by a year-on-year drop in stillbirth rates to their lowest ever levels in England. A global version of customized growth charts with over 100 ethnic origin categories is being launched in 2018, and will provide an individualized, yet universally applicable, standard for fetal growth.
适当的胎儿生长和出生体重评估标准是良好临床护理的核心,随着越来越多的证据表明与生长相关的不良结局是可以避免的,这些标准变得更加重要。标准需要基于证据,并通过与妊娠结局进行验证,以证明其具有实用性和有效性。对 Intergrowth 联盟提出的采用其单一国际标准的建议进行审查后发现,几乎没有证据支持其声称的小案例是由于营养不良或发育迟缓引起的,而有大量证据表明不同国家和种族群体之间存在正常的生理变异。一刀切的标准可能不适合任何人,如果实施可能会造成伤害。另一种选择是采用国家特定图表的概念,这可以改善异常生长与不良结局之间的关联。然而,这种标准忽略了影响胎儿生长的个体生理变异,这种变异存在于任何异质人群中,且超过了国家间的差异。因此,更合理的方法是根据每位母亲的特征进行调整,考虑她的种族起源以及她的身高、体重和产次,并针对每个妊娠设定生长和出生体重标准,以便评估实际生长情况。定制标准更好地反映了胎儿大小谱两端的不良妊娠结局,增加了临床医生对生长评估的信心,同时在异常大小仅代表生理变异时提供了保证。在英国,该标准作为全面生长评估方案(GAP)的一部分推出,导致由于胎儿生长受限而面临风险的婴儿在产前检测中的比例稳步上升。这反过来又伴随着每年的死产率下降到英格兰有史以来的最低水平。2018 年,将推出一种具有 100 多种种族分类的全球定制生长图表版本,为胎儿生长提供个性化但普遍适用的标准。