Eekhoff Judy K
, Seattle, WA, 98144, USA.
Am J Psychoanal. 2018 Mar;78(1):63-73. doi: 10.1057/s11231-017-9122-5.
This paper discusses the use of somatic countertransference as a means of learning about the patient, about projective and adhesive identification and about the object relating nature of the most traumatized and withdrawn part of the personality. It assumes an elemental knowledge of British Object Relations and uses clinical material to illustrate the hypotheses that somatic countertransference is an indicator of a very elemental communication occurring from the aspect of the psyche that is united in a body mind or mind body. The paper assumes that this body mind was object seeking at birth and perhaps before. Because these early aspects of the personality are non verbal and non conceptual, the analyst must rely not only on the verbal material in a session but on the emotional and sensual experiences within the transference and the countertransference. Such reliance requires a faith in one's own intuition without a certainty that one is "right." Because speaking of such early experience is difficult, often writers and analysts appear more certain than they are. This is a hazard of this type of analytic work. What I am writing about is conjecture or imagination or dream, but I am suggesting that such dream work is a valuable tool for analysis.
本文探讨了运用躯体反移情作为了解患者、投射性认同和粘附性认同以及人格中受创伤最深且最退缩部分的客体关系本质的一种方式。它假定读者具备英国客体关系的基础知识，并运用临床素材来说明以下假设：躯体反移情是一种非常基本的交流的指标，这种交流源自心理中在身心或心身层面统一的那一方面。本文假定这种身心在出生时甚至更早便在寻求客体。由于人格的这些早期方面是非言语且非概念性的，分析师不仅必须依赖治疗过程中的言语素材，还需依赖移情和反移情中的情感及感官体验。这种依赖要求对自身直觉抱有信念，却无法确定自己是“正确的”。由于谈论此类早期经历颇具难度，故而作家和分析师们常常显得比实际情况更有把握。这是这类分析工作的一个风险。我所写的内容是推测、想象或梦境，但我认为这种梦境工作是分析的一项宝贵工具。
