Suppr超能文献

孕产妇和新生儿护理中接触与内容之间的差距:对撒哈拉以南非洲20个国家数据的分析

Gap between contact and content in maternal and newborn care: An analysis of data from 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

作者信息

Carvajal-Aguirre Liliana, Amouzou Agbessi, Mehra Vrinda, Ziqi Meng, Zaka Nabila, Newby Holly

机构信息

Data and Analytics, Division of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA.

Institute for International Programs, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020501. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020501.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, coverage of maternal and newborn health indicators used for global monitoring and reporting have increased substantially but reductions in maternal and neonatal mortality have remained slow. This has led to an increased recognition and concern that these standard globally agreed upon measures of antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance (SBA) and postnatal care (PNC) only capture the level of contacts with the health system and provide little indication of actual content of services received by mothers and their newborns. Over this period, large household surveys have captured measures of maternal and newborn care mainly through questions assessing contacts during the antenatal, delivery and postnatal periods along with some measures of content of care. This study aims to describe the gap between contact and content -as a proxy for quality- of maternal and newborn health services by assessing level of co-coverage of ANC and PNC interventions.

METHODS

We used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from 20 countries between 2010 and 2015. We analysed the proportion of women with at least 1 and 4+ antenatal care visit, who received 8 interventions. We also assessed the percentage of newborns delivered with a skilled birth attendant who received 7 interventions. We ran random effect logistic regression to assess factors associated with receiving all interventions during the antenatal and postnatal period.

RESULTS

While on average 51% of women in the analysis received four ANC visits with at least one visit from a skilled health provider, only 5% of them received all 8 ANC interventions. Similarly, during the postnatal period though two-thirds (65%) of births were attended by a skilled birth attendant, only 3% of newborns received all 7 PNC interventions. The odds of receiving all ANC and PNC interventions were higher for women with higher education and higher wealth status.

CONCLUSION

The gap between coverage and content as a proxy of quality of antenatal and postnatal care is excessively large in all countries. In order to accelerate maternal and newborn survival and achieve Sustainable Development Goals, increased efforts are needed to improve both the coverage and quality of maternal and newborn health interventions.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,用于全球监测和报告的孕产妇和新生儿健康指标的覆盖率大幅提高,但孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的下降速度仍然缓慢。这导致人们越来越认识到并担忧,这些全球商定的产前保健(ANC)、熟练接生(SBA)和产后保健(PNC)的标准措施仅反映了与卫生系统的接触水平,几乎无法表明母亲及其新生儿实际接受的服务内容。在此期间,大型家庭调查主要通过评估产前、分娩和产后期间接触情况的问题以及一些护理内容指标来获取孕产妇和新生儿护理的测量数据。本研究旨在通过评估产前保健和产后保健干预措施的共同覆盖率,描述孕产妇和新生儿保健服务在接触与内容(作为质量的替代指标)之间的差距。

方法

我们使用了2010年至2015年间20个国家的人口与健康调查(DHS)数据。我们分析了接受至少1次和4次以上产前检查的妇女中接受8项干预措施的比例。我们还评估了由熟练接生员接生的新生儿中接受7项干预措施的百分比。我们进行了随机效应逻辑回归,以评估与产前和产后期间接受所有干预措施相关的因素。

结果

在分析中,平均有51%的妇女接受了4次产前检查,其中至少有1次是由熟练的卫生保健人员进行的,但只有5%的妇女接受了所有8项产前保健干预措施。同样,在产后期间,虽然三分之二(65%)的分娩由熟练接生员接生,但只有3%的新生儿接受了所有7项产后保健干预措施。受教育程度较高和财富状况较好的妇女接受所有产前保健和产后保健干预措施的几率更高。

结论

在所有国家中,作为产前和产后保健质量替代指标的覆盖率与内容之间的差距都过大。为了加速孕产妇和新生儿的生存并实现可持续发展目标,需要加大力度提高孕产妇和新生儿保健干预措施的覆盖率和质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae0/5804037/0665ab9c6418/jogh-07-020501-F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验