• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找并吸引患者及公众共同参与急性感染微生物学研究公众小组的工作。

Finding and engaging patients and the public to work collaboratively on an acute infection microbiology research public panel.

作者信息

Grier Sally, Evans David, Gibson Andy, Chin Teh Li, Stoddart Margaret, Kok Michele, Campbell Richard, Kenny Val, MacGowan Alasdair

机构信息

1Department of Infection Sciences, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.

2Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jan 29;4:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0083-5. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-018-0083-5
PMID:29423276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5787913/
Abstract

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

In 2015 a microbiology team in Bristol joined a European research project that aims to develop new antibiotics to fight drug resistant infections. The microbiology team were convinced of the benefits of patient and public involvement, but had found it difficult to find former patients to work with on earlier microbiology research. This paper describes how the team overcame this challenge to successfully recruit a PPI panel to develop PPI within the European project.The advice from people with experience in public involvement was to decide what criteria were desirable for panel membership, think about what the work of the panel might involve and how long the project will go on. The team decided that experience of suffering a serious acute infection would qualify people to comment on this project. Next, the team needed to identify ways of finding people to join the PPI panel.The microbiology research team tried different ways to approach potential panel members. These included distributing flyers at public research events, sending emails to potentially interested people, posting a message on the hospital Facebook page and approaching eligible people known to the team. A direct approach was the most successful method - either by email, mail or in person. Ultimately 16 people were selected to form the panel. Key factors for success were planning what the work of the panel might be, perseverance despite early lack of success, and one person having overall responsibility for setting up the panel, with the support of the whole team.

ABSTRACT

In 2015 the microbiology research team became involved in a large European programme of research aiming to bring new antimicrobial drugs onto the market to combat the increasing problem of multi-drug resistant infection. With the purpose of developing patient and public involvement (PPI) in this project, the team decided to recruit a PPI panel to work with. The microbiology team had previously worked with a PPI panel on other research, but had found it difficult to recruit members. Steps taken to recruit the panel were as follows:Advice was sought from people experienced in co-ordinating public involvement in research.One person in the team had overall responsibility but the whole research team was committed and met regularly.Two of the team undertook training in group facilitation and connecting with the public.Decisions were made about the criteria for inclusion into the panel, what tasks we envisaged for the panel, the length of and frequency of meetings.Advertising the involvement opportunity through flyers, social media, emails and direct contact with possible panel recruits known to the research team.Relevant documents such as a Role Profile and expression of interest form were drafted.An initial public meeting was planned for all who had shown interest in the panel.The expression of interest form was used for us to select as broad a group as possible.. Two out of three people who were approached directly and known by team members expressed interest in joining the panel (66%). Three out of seven members of a former panel were next (43%), then 10 out of 25 spinal infection clinic patients (40%), and finally 12 people responded to an email sent to 1261 foundation trust members (1%). No-one who was approached by indirect methods e.g. flyers or advertising on Facebook, expressed interest in the panel. Sixteen people were eventually selected for the panel. It is possible to recruit a patient and public involvement panel for research in a discipline as challenging as microbiology. Good planning and the commitment of the research team were key to success.

摘要

通俗易懂的总结

2015年,布里斯托尔的一个微生物学团队加入了一个欧洲研究项目,该项目旨在开发新的抗生素以对抗耐药性感染。微生物学团队坚信患者和公众参与的益处,但发现在早期微生物学研究中很难找到曾经的患者来合作。本文描述了该团队如何克服这一挑战,成功招募了一个患者和公众参与小组(PPI小组),以便在欧洲项目中开展患者和公众参与工作。有公众参与经验的人士给出的建议是,确定小组成员理想的标准,思考小组的工作可能涉及哪些方面以及项目将持续多长时间。该团队决定,曾患严重急性感染的经历将使人们有资格对这个项目发表意见。接下来,该团队需要确定寻找人员加入PPI小组的方法。微生物学研究团队尝试了不同的方式来接触潜在的小组成员。这些方式包括在公共研究活动中分发传单、给可能感兴趣的人发送电子邮件、在医院的脸书页面上发布消息以及接触团队认识的符合条件的人。直接接触是最成功的方法——通过电子邮件、信件或亲自接触。最终挑选出16人组成小组。成功的关键因素包括规划小组的工作可能是什么样的、尽管早期没有成功但仍坚持不懈,以及有一个人在整个团队的支持下全面负责组建小组。

摘要

2015年,微生物学研究团队参与了一个大型欧洲研究项目,旨在将新抗菌药物推向市场,以应对多重耐药性感染日益严重的问题。为了在该项目中开展患者和公众参与(PPI)工作,该团队决定招募一个PPI小组来合作。微生物学团队此前曾在其他研究中与一个PPI小组合作,但发现招募成员很困难。招募该小组采取的步骤如下:向有协调公众参与研究经验的人士征求意见。团队中有一人全面负责,但整个研究团队都全身心投入且定期开会。团队中的两人参加了群体促进和与公众沟通方面的培训。就小组成员的入选标准、我们设想的小组任务、会议时长和频率做出了决定。通过传单、社交媒体、电子邮件以及与研究团队认识的可能的小组成员直接接触来宣传参与机会。起草了相关文件,如角色简介和兴趣表达表。为所有对该小组感兴趣的人计划了一次初步的公开会议。使用兴趣表达表以便我们尽可能广泛地挑选人员。团队成员直接接触并认识的人中,三分之二表示有兴趣加入该小组(66%)。前一个小组的七名成员中有三名(43%),然后25名脊柱感染诊所患者中有10名(40%),最后向1261名基金会信托成员发送的电子邮件中有12人回复(1%)。通过间接方式如传单或脸书广告接触的人中,没有人表示对该小组感兴趣。最终挑选出16人组成该小组。在像微生物学这样具有挑战性的学科中,为研究招募患者和公众参与小组是有可能的。良好的规划和研究团队的投入是成功的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2282/5787913/7f5295a60346/40900_2018_83_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2282/5787913/7f5295a60346/40900_2018_83_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2282/5787913/7f5295a60346/40900_2018_83_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Finding and engaging patients and the public to work collaboratively on an acute infection microbiology research public panel.寻找并吸引患者及公众共同参与急性感染微生物学研究公众小组的工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jan 29;4:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0083-5. eCollection 2018.
2
A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges.一项关于设立一项涉及非专业共同研究者的健康研究的益处与成本的联合研究,以及我们是如何克服这些挑战的。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 3;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3. eCollection 2016.
3
Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement.学会协同合作——一项关于公众参与的研究项目反思性分析的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x. eCollection 2017.
4
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
5
Forced migrants involved in setting the agenda and designing research to reduce impacts of complex emergencies: combining with patient and public involvement.参与制定议程和设计研究以减少复杂紧急情况影响的被迫移民:与患者及公众参与相结合。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Nov 6;3:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0073-z. eCollection 2017.
6
Service user reflections on the impact of involvement in research.服务使用者对参与研究的影响的反思。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Mar 26;4:11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0095-1. eCollection 2018.
7
A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research.一个用于姑息治疗研究的更公平、多元和包容的患者及公众参与框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 8;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00525-3.
8
INVOLVING CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS IN RESEARCH DESIGN.让儿童及其父母参与研究设计。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Sep;101(9):e2. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311535.75.
9
Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme.与东米德兰兹地区的公众和研究组织成员共同开展公众参与培训:创建、实施和评估外行人评估员培训计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 5;3:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0056-0. eCollection 2017.
10
What are the strengths and limitations to utilising creative methods in public and patient involvement in health and social care research? A qualitative systematic review.在公共和患者参与卫生与社会保健研究中运用创新方法的优势和局限性有哪些?一项定性系统综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 13;10(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00580-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of public and patient involvement in designing a web-based, physical activity application for individuals with severe mental illness.公众和患者参与为重度精神疾病患者设计基于网络的体育活动应用程序的作用。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 21;11(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00735-x.
2
The Development of Principles for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: A Modified Delphi Study.患者和公众参与(PPI)在临床前脊髓研究中的原则的发展:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14130. doi: 10.1111/hex.14130.
3
Recruitment of patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups and panels in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
2
Black and minority ethnic group involvement in health and social care research: A systematic review.少数民族群体参与健康和社会保健研究:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):3-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12597. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
3
Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning.
招募患者、护理人员和公众成员加入公共和患者参与的健康研究中的咨询委员会、小组和专题小组:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 13;13(10):e072918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072918.
4
Applying Patient and Public Involvement in preclinical research: A co-created scoping review.将患者和公众参与应用于临床前研究:共同创建的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2680-2699. doi: 10.1111/hex.13615. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
5
The antimicrobial resistance travel tool, an interactive evidence-based educational tool to limit antimicrobial resistance spread.抗菌药物耐药旅行工具,一种互动式循证教育工具,旨在限制抗菌药物耐药传播。
J Travel Med. 2022 Jul 14;29(4). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taac045.
6
Patient Uptake, Experiences, and Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Tinnitus in the United States.美国一项针对耳鸣的基于互联网的认知行为疗法随机对照试验的患者接受情况、体验及过程评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 17;8:771646. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.771646. eCollection 2021.
谁的声音?患者及公众参与临床委托服务
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):484-494. doi: 10.1111/hex.12475. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
4
How to optimise patient and public involvement in your research: Doing science.如何优化患者及公众参与你的研究:开展科研工作。
Breathe (Sheff). 2015 Sep;11(3):223-7. doi: 10.1183/20734735.007615.
5
What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials.患者及公众参与能产生何种影响及其产生影响的途径是什么?对一组随机临床试验中的患者和研究人员进行的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 8;10(6):e0128817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128817. eCollection 2015.
6
Patient and public involvement to support liver disease research.患者及公众参与以支持肝病研究。
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(16):972-6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.16.972.