Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, 3108 Parren Mitchell Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, 4133 Parren Mitchell Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Demography. 2018 Feb;55(1):107-133. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0647-x.
Assumptions that single mothers are "time poor" compared with married mothers are ubiquitous. We tested theorized associations derived from the time poverty thesis and the gender perspective using the 2003-2012 American Time Use Surveys (ATUS). We found marital status differentiated housework, leisure, and sleep time, but did not influence the amount of time that mothers provided childcare. Net of the number of employment hours, married mothers did more housework and slept less than never-married and divorced mothers, counter to expectations of the time poverty thesis. Never-married and cohabiting mothers reported more total and more sedentary leisure time than married mothers. We assessed the influence of demographic differences among mothers to account for variation in their time use by marital status. Compositional differences explained more than two-thirds of the variance in sedentary leisure time between married and never-married mothers, but only one-third of the variance between married and cohabiting mothers. The larger unexplained gap in leisure quality between cohabiting and married mothers is consistent with the gender perspective.
与已婚母亲相比,单身母亲“时间匮乏”的假设比比皆是。我们使用 2003-2012 年美国时间使用调查(ATUS),检验了源自时间匮乏理论和性别视角的理论假设关联。我们发现,婚姻状况使家务、休闲和睡眠时间产生差异,但并未影响母亲提供育儿时间的多少。除去工作时间的数量,已婚母亲比未婚和离异母亲做更多的家务和更少的睡眠,这与时间匮乏理论的预期相悖。未婚和同居母亲比已婚母亲报告了更多的总休闲时间和更多的久坐休闲时间。我们评估了母亲之间的人口统计学差异对其按婚姻状况分配的时间利用的影响。组成差异解释了已婚和未婚母亲之间久坐休闲时间差异的三分之二以上,但仅解释了已婚和同居母亲之间差异的三分之一。同居和已婚母亲之间休闲质量差距较大,这与性别视角一致。