Li Wei, Liu Yan-Cheng, Zheng Chen-Fan, Miao Jun, Chen Hui, Quan Hai-Ying, Yan Song-Hua, Zhang Kuan
School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Orthop Surg. 2018 Feb;10(1):47-55. doi: 10.1111/os.12362. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
To establish a logistic regression model using surface electromyography (SEMG) parameters for diagnosing the compressed nerve root at L or S level in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
This study recruited 24 patients with L nerve root compression and 23 patients with S nerve root compression caused by LDH from May 2014 to May 2016. SEMG signals from the bilateral tibialis anterior and lateral gastrocnemius were measured. The root mean square (RMS), the RMS peak time, the mean power frequency (MPF), and the median frequency (MF) were analyzed. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values were calculated separately. The areas under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the kappa value were used to evaluate the accuracy of the SEMG diagnostic model.
The accuracy of the SEMG model ranged from 85.71% to 100%, with an average of 93.57%. The sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and kappa value of the logistic regression model were 0.98 ± 0.05, 0.92 ± 0.09, 0.95 ± 0.04 (P = 0.006), and 0.87 ± 0.11, respectively (P = 0.001). The final diagnostic model was: P=1-11+ey; y = 10.76 - (5.95 × TA_RMS Ratio) - (0.38 × TA_RMS Peak Time Ratio) - (5.44 × 44 × LG_RMS Peak Time Ratio). L nerve root compression is diagnosed when P < 0.5 and S nerve root compression when P ≥ 0.5.
The logistic regression model developed in this study showed high diagnostic accuracy in detecting the compressed nerve root (L and S ) in these patients with LDH.
建立一种利用表面肌电图(SEMG)参数诊断腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者L或S水平神经根受压的逻辑回归模型。
本研究纳入了2014年5月至2016年5月因LDH导致L神经根受压的24例患者和S神经根受压的23例患者。测量双侧胫前肌和腓外侧肌的SEMG信号。分析均方根(RMS)、RMS峰值时间、平均功率频率(MPF)和中位数频率(MF)。分别计算准确性、敏感性和特异性值。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)和kappa值评估SEMG诊断模型的准确性。
SEMG模型的准确性范围为85.71%至100%,平均为93.57%。逻辑回归模型的敏感性、特异性、AUC和kappa值分别为0.98±0.05、0.92±0.09、0.95±0.04(P = 0.006)和0.87±0.11(P = 0.001)。最终诊断模型为:P = 1 /(1 + e^y);y = 10.76 -(5.95×胫前肌RMS比值)-(0.38×胫前肌RMS峰值时间比值)-(5.44×腓外侧肌RMS峰值时间比值)。当P < 0.5时诊断为L神经根受压,当P≥0.5时诊断为S神经根受压。
本研究建立的逻辑回归模型在检测这些LDH患者的受压神经根(L和S)方面显示出较高的诊断准确性。