Schlemm Ludwig, Schlemm Eckhard
Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Neurol. 2018 Feb 10;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1021-8.
Clinical scales to detect large vessel occlusion (LVO) may help to determine the optimal transport destination for patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The clinical benefit associated with improved diagnostic accuracy of these scales has not been quantified.
We used a previously reported conditional model to estimate the probability of good outcome (modified Rankin scale sore ≤2) for patients with AIS and unknown vessel status occurring in regions with greater proximity to a primary than to a comprehensive stroke center. Optimal rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale cutoff scores were calculated based on time-dependent effect-size estimates from recent randomized controlled trials. Probabilities of good outcome were compared between a triage strategy based on these cutoffs and a strategy based on a hypothetical perfect LVO detection tool with 100% diagnostic accuracy.
In our model, the additional benefit of a perfect LVO detection tool as compared to optimal transport-time dependent RACE cutoff scores ranges from 0 to 5%. It is largest for patients with medium stroke symptom severity (RACE score 5) and in geographic environments with longer transfer time between the primary and comprehensive stroke center.
Based on a probabilistic conditional model, the results of our simulation indicate that more accurate prehospital clinical LVO detections scales may be associated with only modest improvements in the expected probability of good outcome for patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke and unknown vessel status.
用于检测大血管闭塞(LVO)的临床量表可能有助于确定疑似急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的最佳转运目的地。这些量表诊断准确性提高所带来的临床益处尚未得到量化。
我们使用先前报道的条件模型,来估计在距离初级卒中中心比综合卒中中心更近的地区发生的、血管状况未知的AIS患者获得良好预后(改良Rankin量表评分≤2)的概率。基于近期随机对照试验的时间依赖性效应大小估计值,计算最佳快速动脉闭塞评估(RACE)量表的临界分数。将基于这些临界分数的分诊策略与基于假设的具有100%诊断准确性完美LVO检测工具的策略进行比较,并比较两者获得良好预后的概率。
在我们的模型中,与最佳转运时间依赖性RACE临界分数相比完美LVO检测工具带来的额外益处为0%至5%。对于卒中症状严重程度中等(RACE评分5)的患者以及初级和综合卒中中心之间转运时间较长的地理环境中,额外益处最大。
基于概率条件模型,我们的模拟结果表明,对于疑似急性缺血性卒中和血管状况未知的患者,更准确的院前临床LVO检测量表可能仅会使其获得良好预后的预期概率有适度提高。