Advanced Highway Maintenance and Construction Technology Research Center (AHMCT), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States.
Advanced Highway Maintenance and Construction Technology Research Center (AHMCT), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Apr;113:202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.030. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Highway workers frequently work in close proximity of live traffic in highway work zones, traffic accidents therefore have devastating effects on worker safety. In order to reduce the potential for such accidents, methods involving use of advisory signs and police presence have been used to mitigate accident risks and improve safety for highway workers. This research evaluates the magnitude of the speeding problem in highway work zones and the effects of four levels of police presence on improving work zone safety. Speed data were collected in six different work zone locations in northern and southern California and used to determine the magnitude and nature of speeding problem in highway work zones. In addition data were collected over 11 test-days in four work zones with four levels of police presence: radar speed display with police decal and lighting, passive use of a police vehicle with radar speed display, passive use of a police vehicle without radar speed display, and active police speed enforcement near work zones. This paper analyzes this data using statistical methods to evaluate the effectiveness of these different methods of speed control on the safety of the work zone. Four Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) were used in this evaluation consisting of average speed reduction, speed variance, 85th percentile speed, and proportion of high speed vehicles. The results indicate that all levels of police presence provided statistically significant improvements in one or more of the MOEs.
公路工人经常在高速公路工作区的车辆行驶中近距离工作,因此交通事故对工人安全造成了毁灭性的影响。为了降低此类事故的发生概率,已经使用了涉及使用警示标志和警察驻守的方法来减轻事故风险并提高高速公路工人的安全性。本研究评估了高速公路工作区超速问题的严重程度以及四级警察驻守对改善工作区安全的影响。在加利福尼亚州北部和南部的六个不同工作区地点收集了速度数据,以确定高速公路工作区超速问题的严重程度和性质。此外,在四个工作区的 11 个测试日中收集了数据,这些工作区具有四级警察驻守:带有警察贴花和照明的雷达速度显示屏、被动使用带有雷达速度显示屏的警车、被动使用没有雷达速度显示屏的警车以及在工作区附近主动进行警察速度执法。本文使用统计方法分析这些数据,以评估这些不同速度控制方法对工作区安全性的有效性。在该评估中使用了四个效果度量(MOE),包括平均速度降低、速度方差、85 百分位速度和高速车辆比例。结果表明,所有级别的警察驻守都在一个或多个 MOE 方面提供了具有统计学意义的改进。