Bank Lindsay, Jippes Mariëlle, Leppink Jimmie, Scherpbier Albert Jja, den Rooyen Corry, van Luijk Scheltus J, Scheele Fedde
Department of Healthcare Education, OLVG Hospital.
Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary Research, VU University, Amsterdam.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Jan 31;9:75-83. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S146018. eCollection 2018.
The field of postgraduate medical education (PGME) is continuously evolving as a result of social demands and advancing educational insights. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for successful implementation of change initiatives. However, in PGME, assessing change readiness is rarely considered while it could be of great value for managing educational change such as curriculum change. Therefore, in a previous Delphi study the authors developed an instrument for assessing ORC in PGME: Specialty Training's Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC). In this study, the psychometric properties of this questionnaire were further explored.
In 2015, STORC was distributed among clinical teaching teams in the Netherlands. The authors conducted a confirmatory factor analysis on the internal factor structure of STORC. The reliability of the measurements was estimated by calculating Cronbach's alpha for all sub-scales. Additionally, a behavioral support-for-change measure was distributed as well to assess correlations with change-related behavior.
In total, the STORC questionnaire was completed by 856 clinical teaching team members from 39 specialties. Factor analysis led to the removal of 1 item but supported the expected factor structure with very good fit for the other 43 items. Supportive behavior was positively correlated to a higher level of ORC.
In this study, additional steps to collect validity evidence for the STORC questionnaire were taken successfully. The final subscales of STORC represent the core components of ORC in the literature. By breaking down this concept into multiple measurable aspects, STORC could help to enable educational leaders to diagnose possible hurdles in implementation processes and to perform specifically targeted interventions when needed.
由于社会需求和教育理念的不断进步,研究生医学教育(PGME)领域也在持续发展。变革专家认为,组织变革准备度(ORC)是成功实施变革举措的关键前提。然而,在PGME中,评估变革准备度很少被考虑,而它对于管理诸如课程变革等教育变革可能具有很大价值。因此,在之前的一项德尔菲研究中,作者开发了一种用于评估PGME中ORC的工具:专业培训课程变革的组织准备度(STORC)。在本研究中,进一步探讨了该问卷的心理测量特性。
2015年,STORC被分发给荷兰的临床教学团队。作者对STORC的内部因素结构进行了验证性因素分析。通过计算所有子量表的克朗巴哈系数来估计测量的可靠性。此外,还分发了一项变革行为支持测量工具,以评估与变革相关行为的相关性。
共有来自39个专业的856名临床教学团队成员完成了STORC问卷。因素分析导致删除了1个项目,但支持了预期的因素结构,其他43个项目的拟合度非常好。支持性行为与较高水平的ORC呈正相关。
在本研究中,成功采取了额外步骤来收集STORC问卷的效度证据。STORC的最终子量表代表了文献中ORC的核心组成部分。通过将这一概念分解为多个可测量的方面,STORC可以帮助教育领导者诊断实施过程中可能存在的障碍,并在需要时进行针对性的干预。