• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Specialty Training's Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire.专业培训对课程变革的组织准备情况(STORC):一份调查问卷的验证
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Jan 31;9:75-83. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S146018. eCollection 2018.
2
Specialty Training's Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): development of a questionnaire in a Delphi study.专科培训对课程变革的组织准备度(STORC):德尔菲研究中一份问卷的编制
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Aug 5;15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0408-0.
3
Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams.他们准备好了吗?临床教学团队对变革的组织准备情况。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Dec 14;8:807-815. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S146021. eCollection 2017.
4
How To Get Your Clinical Teaching Team Ready For Curriculum Change: A Practical Guide.如何让临床教学团队为课程变革做好准备:实用指南
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Nov 19;10:979-986. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S211958. eCollection 2019.
5
A medical school's organizational readiness for curriculum change (MORC): development and validation of a questionnaire.医学院校课程改革的组织准备度(MORC):问卷的编制与验证。
Acad Med. 2013 Sep;88(9):1346-56. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829f0869.
6
Readiness to change for interprofessional collaboration in healthcare: Development and validation of a theory-based instrument.医疗保健领域跨专业协作的变革意愿:一种基于理论的工具的开发与验证
J Interprof Care. 2018 Sep;32(5):539-548. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1448371. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Assessing the reliability and validity of the Danish version of Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC).评估丹麦版组织变革实施准备度(ORIC)的可靠性和有效性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 5;13(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0769-y.
8
Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure.组织变革准备度评估:新测量工具的心理计量学评估。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 10;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-7.
9
Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) test used in the implementation of assessment instruments and treatment methods in a Swedish National study.在瑞典全国性研究中实施评估工具和治疗方法时使用的组织变革准备度(ORC)测试。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Jan;84:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
10
Measuring Organizational Readiness for Change in Michigan's Home and Community-based Services Program: Instrument Adaptation and Psychometric Testing.密歇根州家庭和社区服务计划变革组织准备度的衡量:工具改编与心理测量测试。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2022 Jul-Sep;41(3):255-266. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2022.2077161. Epub 2022 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning from the implementation of clinical empathy training: an explorative qualitative study in search of the barriers and facilitators.从临床同理心培训的实施中学习:探索性定性研究,寻找障碍和促进因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 23;22(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03877-8.
2
Change Management in Medical Contexts, especially in Medical Education: A Systematized Review.医疗背景下的变革管理,尤其是医学教育中的变革管理:一项系统综述
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Oct;10(4):219-227. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.96519.1704.
3
Development and validation of the Readiness to Train Assessment Tool (RTAT).培训准备评估工具(RTAT)的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 28;21(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06406-3.
4
How To Get Your Clinical Teaching Team Ready For Curriculum Change: A Practical Guide.如何让临床教学团队为课程变革做好准备:实用指南
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Nov 19;10:979-986. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S211958. eCollection 2019.
5
How clinical teaching teams deal with educational change: 'we just do it'.临床教学团队如何应对教育变革:“我们只是去做”。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1815-4.
6
What models of change can be used to implement change in postgraduate medical education?可以采用哪些变革模式来实施研究生医学教育的变革?
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Mar 19;9:175-178. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S160626. eCollection 2018.
7
Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams.他们准备好了吗?临床教学团队对变革的组织准备情况。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Dec 14;8:807-815. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S146021. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing Competency-Based Medical Education: A Charter for Clinician-Educators.推进基于能力的医学教育:临床教育工作者宪章。
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):645-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001048.
2
Specialty Training's Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): development of a questionnaire in a Delphi study.专科培训对课程变革的组织准备度(STORC):德尔菲研究中一份问卷的编制
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Aug 5;15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0408-0.
3
A systematic review of instruments to assess organizational readiness for knowledge translation in health care.对评估医疗保健领域知识转化的组织准备度的工具进行的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e114338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114338. eCollection 2014.
4
Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure.组织变革准备度评估:新测量工具的心理计量学评估。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 10;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-7.
5
Is the modernisation of postgraduate medical training in the Netherlands successful? Views of the NVMO Special Interest Group on Postgraduate Medical Education.荷兰的研究生医学培训现代化是否成功?荷兰医学协会研究生医学教育特别兴趣小组的观点。
Med Teach. 2014 Feb;36(2):116-20. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.849333. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
6
A medical school's organizational readiness for curriculum change (MORC): development and validation of a questionnaire.医学院校课程改革的组织准备度(MORC):问卷的编制与验证。
Acad Med. 2013 Sep;88(9):1346-56. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829f0869.
7
Facilitators and barriers to a nationwide implementation of competency-based postgraduate medical curricula: a qualitative study.促进和阻碍基于能力的研究生医学课程在全国范围内实施的因素:一项定性研究。
Med Teach. 2012;34(8):e589-602. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.670325. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
8
Are you ready? How health professionals can comprehensively conceptualize readiness for change.你准备好了吗?健康专业人员如何全面地概念化改变的准备程度。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):50-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1112-8.
9
Organizational Change Questionnaire-Climate of Change, Processes, and Readiness: development of a new instrument.组织变革问卷-变革氛围、变革过程和变革准备:新工具的开发。
J Psychol. 2009 Dec;143(6):559-99. doi: 10.1080/00223980903218216.
10
A theory of organizational readiness for change.组织变革准备度理论。
Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 19;4:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67.

专业培训对课程变革的组织准备情况(STORC):一份调查问卷的验证

Specialty Training's Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire.

作者信息

Bank Lindsay, Jippes Mariëlle, Leppink Jimmie, Scherpbier Albert Jja, den Rooyen Corry, van Luijk Scheltus J, Scheele Fedde

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Education, OLVG Hospital.

Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary Research, VU University, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Jan 31;9:75-83. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S146018. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S146018
PMID:29430202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5797471/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The field of postgraduate medical education (PGME) is continuously evolving as a result of social demands and advancing educational insights. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for successful implementation of change initiatives. However, in PGME, assessing change readiness is rarely considered while it could be of great value for managing educational change such as curriculum change. Therefore, in a previous Delphi study the authors developed an instrument for assessing ORC in PGME: Specialty Training's Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC). In this study, the psychometric properties of this questionnaire were further explored.

METHODS

In 2015, STORC was distributed among clinical teaching teams in the Netherlands. The authors conducted a confirmatory factor analysis on the internal factor structure of STORC. The reliability of the measurements was estimated by calculating Cronbach's alpha for all sub-scales. Additionally, a behavioral support-for-change measure was distributed as well to assess correlations with change-related behavior.

RESULTS

In total, the STORC questionnaire was completed by 856 clinical teaching team members from 39 specialties. Factor analysis led to the removal of 1 item but supported the expected factor structure with very good fit for the other 43 items. Supportive behavior was positively correlated to a higher level of ORC.

DISCUSSION

In this study, additional steps to collect validity evidence for the STORC questionnaire were taken successfully. The final subscales of STORC represent the core components of ORC in the literature. By breaking down this concept into multiple measurable aspects, STORC could help to enable educational leaders to diagnose possible hurdles in implementation processes and to perform specifically targeted interventions when needed.

摘要

背景

由于社会需求和教育理念的不断进步,研究生医学教育(PGME)领域也在持续发展。变革专家认为,组织变革准备度(ORC)是成功实施变革举措的关键前提。然而,在PGME中,评估变革准备度很少被考虑,而它对于管理诸如课程变革等教育变革可能具有很大价值。因此,在之前的一项德尔菲研究中,作者开发了一种用于评估PGME中ORC的工具:专业培训课程变革的组织准备度(STORC)。在本研究中,进一步探讨了该问卷的心理测量特性。

方法

2015年,STORC被分发给荷兰的临床教学团队。作者对STORC的内部因素结构进行了验证性因素分析。通过计算所有子量表的克朗巴哈系数来估计测量的可靠性。此外,还分发了一项变革行为支持测量工具,以评估与变革相关行为的相关性。

结果

共有来自39个专业的856名临床教学团队成员完成了STORC问卷。因素分析导致删除了1个项目,但支持了预期的因素结构,其他43个项目的拟合度非常好。支持性行为与较高水平的ORC呈正相关。

讨论

在本研究中,成功采取了额外步骤来收集STORC问卷的效度证据。STORC的最终子量表代表了文献中ORC的核心组成部分。通过将这一概念分解为多个可测量的方面,STORC可以帮助教育领导者诊断实施过程中可能存在的障碍,并在需要时进行针对性的干预。