• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非得赢了才能解决问题吗?彩票中奖者及其医疗需求的纵向研究。

DO YOU HAVE TO WIN IT TO FIX IT? A Longitudinal Study of Lottery Winners and Their Health-Care Demand.

作者信息

Cheng Terence C, Costa-I-Font Joan, Powdthavee Nattavudh

机构信息

University of Adelaide.

London School of Economics.

出版信息

Am J Health Econ. 2018 Winter;4(1):26-50. doi: 10.1162/ajhe_a_00092. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1162/ajhe_a_00092
PMID:29430486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5802355/
Abstract

We exploit lottery wins to investigate the effects of exogenous changes to individuals' income on the utilization of health care services, and the choice between private and public health care in the United Kingdom. Our empirical strategy focuses on lottery winners in an individual fixed effects framework and hence the variation of winnings arises from within-individual differences in small versus large winnings. The results indicate that lottery winners with larger wins are more likely to choose private health services than public health services from the National Health Service. The positive effect of wins on the choice of private care is driven largely by winners with medium to large winnings (win category £500 (or US$750); mean = £1922.5 (US$2,893.5), median = £1058.2 (US$1592.7)). There is some evidence that the effect of winnings vary by whether individuals have private health insurance. We also find weak evidence that large winners are more likely to take up private medical insurance. Large winners are also more likely to drop private insurance coverage between approximately 9 and 10 months earlier than smaller winners, possibly after their winnings have been exhausted. Our estimates for the lottery income elasticities for public health care (relative to no care) are very small and are not statistically distinguishable from zero; those of private health care range from 0 - 0.26 for most of the health services considered, and 0.82 for cervical smear.

摘要

我们利用彩票中奖来研究个人收入的外生变化对医疗保健服务利用的影响,以及英国私人医疗保健与公共医疗保健之间的选择。我们的实证策略聚焦于个体固定效应框架下的彩票中奖者,因此奖金的变化源于个体自身小额奖金与大额奖金的差异。结果表明,奖金数额较大的彩票中奖者比从国民医疗服务体系获取公共医疗服务更倾向于选择私人医疗服务。奖金对选择私人医疗的积极影响在很大程度上是由中等到大额奖金的中奖者(中奖类别为500英镑(或750美元);均值 = 1922.5英镑(2893.5美元),中位数 = 1058.2英镑(1592.7美元))驱动的。有证据表明,奖金的影响因个人是否拥有私人医疗保险而有所不同。我们还发现微弱的证据表明大额中奖者更有可能购买私人医疗保险。大额中奖者也比小额中奖者更有可能在大约提前9到10个月放弃私人保险覆盖,这可能是在他们的奖金耗尽之后。我们对公共医疗保健(相对于不接受治疗)的彩票收入弹性估计非常小,且在统计上与零没有显著差异;对于大多数所考虑的医疗服务,私人医疗保健的彩票收入弹性范围为0 - 0.26,而子宫颈涂片检查的弹性为0.82。

相似文献

1
DO YOU HAVE TO WIN IT TO FIX IT? A Longitudinal Study of Lottery Winners and Their Health-Care Demand.非得赢了才能解决问题吗?彩票中奖者及其医疗需求的纵向研究。
Am J Health Econ. 2018 Winter;4(1):26-50. doi: 10.1162/ajhe_a_00092. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
2
Becoming a winner but staying the same: identities and consumption of lottery winners.成为赢家却保持不变:彩票中奖者的身份与消费
Am J Econ Sociol. 2011;70(1):187-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2010.00768.x.
3
Money and mental wellbeing: a longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins.金钱与心理健康:对中等奖额彩票中奖情况的纵向研究。
J Health Econ. 2007 Jan;26(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
4
The effects of income on health: Evidence from lottery wins in Singapore.收入对健康的影响:来自新加坡彩票中奖的证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;76:102414. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102414. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
5
Winning big but feeling no better? The effect of lottery prizes on physical and mental health.赢了大奖却没有感觉更好?彩票奖金对身心健康的影响。
Health Econ. 2015 May;24(5):516-38. doi: 10.1002/hec.3035. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
6
Pennies from heaven? Conceptions and earmarking of lottery prize money.天赐之财?彩票奖金的概念与指定用途
Br J Sociol. 2014 Jun;65(2):225-44. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12073. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Work centrality and post-award work behavior of lottery winners.彩票中奖者的工作中心性与获奖后的工作行为
J Psychol. 2004 Sep;138(5):404-20. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.138.5.404-420.
8
Child outpatient mental health service use: why doesn't insurance matter?儿童门诊心理健康服务的使用:为何保险无关紧要?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 1998 Dec 1;1(4):173-187. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-176x(199812)1:4<173::aid-mhp23>3.0.co;2-7.
9
Association Between Lottery Prize Size and Self-reported Health Habits in Swedish Lottery Players.彩票奖金额与瑞典彩票玩家自报健康习惯的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e1919713. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19713.
10
Long-term care financing: lessons from France.长期护理融资:法国的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):359-91. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12125.

引用本文的文献

1
Income and Health Care Consumption: Evidence From Mortgage Payment Shocks.收入与医疗消费:来自房贷支付冲击的证据
Health Econ. 2025 Oct;34(10):1853-1868. doi: 10.1002/hec.70009. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
2
A hypothetical lottery task to assess relative resource allocation toward alcohol and cannabis.一个假设的彩票任务,用于评估对酒精和大麻的相对资源分配。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;37(1):144-155. doi: 10.1037/adb0000888. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
3
Association Between Lottery Prize Size and Self-reported Health Habits in Swedish Lottery Players.彩票奖金额与瑞典彩票玩家自报健康习惯的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e1919713. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19713.

本文引用的文献

1
Winning big but feeling no better? The effect of lottery prizes on physical and mental health.赢了大奖却没有感觉更好?彩票奖金对身心健康的影响。
Health Econ. 2015 May;24(5):516-38. doi: 10.1002/hec.3035. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
2
Estimating demand for care after a medicaid expansion: lessons from Oregon.评估医疗补助扩大后的医疗需求:来自俄勒冈州的经验教训
J Ambul Care Manage. 2014 Oct-Dec;37(4):282-92. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000023.
3
The Oregon experiment--effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes.俄勒冈实验——医疗补助对临床结果的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1713-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1212321.
4
THE OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE EXPERIMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE FIRST YEAR.俄勒冈医疗保险实验:第一年的证据
Q J Econ. 2012 Aug;127(3):1057-1106. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjs020. Epub 2012 May 3.
5
Income and the utilization of long-term care services: evidence from the Social Security benefit notch.收入与长期护理服务的利用:来自社会保障福利缺口的证据。
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):719-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 May 13.
6
Understanding differences in health behaviors by education.了解不同教育程度人群的健康行为差异。
J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
7
Sociodemographic correlates of internet gambling: findings from the 2007 british gambling prevalence survey.网络赌博的社会人口学相关因素:2007年英国赌博流行率调查结果
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Apr;12(2):199-202. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0196.
8
The child health/family income gradient: Evidence from England.儿童健康/家庭收入梯度:来自英国的证据。
J Health Econ. 2007 Mar 1;26(2):213-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
9
Money and mental wellbeing: a longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins.金钱与心理健康:对中等奖额彩票中奖情况的纵向研究。
J Health Econ. 2007 Jan;26(1):49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
10
Sickness and preventive medical behavior.疾病与预防性医疗行为。
J Health Econ. 2003 Jul;22(4):675-89. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00042-0.