Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):717-726. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13323. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
The aim of this study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies after assisted conception and spontaneous conception, according to chorionicity.
Retrospective cohort study of 1305 twin pregnancies between 1995 and 2015. All spontaneous (n = 731) and assisted conception conceived (n = 574) twin pregnancies with antenatal care and delivery in University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, a tertiary obstetric care center were studied according to chorionicity.
Maternal age and incidence of nulliparity were higher among the assisted conception twins. Hypertensive disorders also appeared to be more frequent in assisted conception pregnancies, which could largely be explained by the higher proportion of elderly nulliparous women in this group. Spontaneously conceived twins were born earlier than twins after assisted conception, with subsequent lower birthweights and more admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit with increased neonatal morbidity. Monochorionic twins had worse pregnancy outcomes compared with dichorionic twins, irrespective of mode of conception; monochorionic twins conceived by assisted reproduction had more neonatal morbidity (mainly respiratory distress syndrome and necrotizing enterocolitis) and late neonatal deaths compared with spontaneously conceived monochorionic twins.
Spontaneously conceived twins have worse pregnancy outcome compared with twins after assisted conception, probably due to a lower incidence of monochorionicity in the assisted conception group. The already increased perinatal risks in monochorionic twins are even higher in monochorionic twins conceived after infertility treatments compared with spontaneously conceived monochorionic twins, which warrants extra attention to these high-risk pregnancies.
本研究旨在比较辅助受孕和自然受孕的双胎妊娠的妊娠结局,并根据绒毛膜性进行比较。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1995 年至 2015 年期间在荷兰乌得勒支大学医学中心进行产前检查和分娩的 1305 例双胎妊娠,其中包括 731 例自然受孕(自然受孕组)和 574 例辅助受孕(辅助受孕组)。所有双胎妊娠均根据绒毛膜性进行分类。
辅助受孕组的产妇年龄和初产妇比例较高。辅助受孕组的高血压疾病似乎更为常见,这在很大程度上可以解释为该组中高龄初产妇的比例较高。与辅助受孕组相比,自然受孕组的双胎妊娠分娩更早,随后出生体重更低,且有更多新生儿入住新生儿重症监护病房,新生儿发病率更高。无论受孕方式如何,单绒毛膜双胎的妊娠结局均较双绒毛膜双胎差;与自然受孕的单绒毛膜双胎相比,接受辅助生殖技术受孕的单绒毛膜双胎的新生儿发病率更高(主要为呼吸窘迫综合征和坏死性小肠结肠炎),且晚期新生儿死亡率更高。
与辅助受孕的双胎妊娠相比,自然受孕的双胎妊娠的妊娠结局更差,这可能是因为辅助受孕组中单绒毛膜性的发生率较低。在已经增加的单绒毛膜双胎的围产期风险中,接受不孕治疗后受孕的单绒毛膜双胎的风险甚至更高,与自然受孕的单绒毛膜双胎相比,这需要对这些高危妊娠给予更多关注。