State Key Laboratory of Environment Health (Incubation), Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health (Wuhan), Ministry of Environmental Protection, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, #13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China.
Hubei Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Wuhan 430022, China.
Environ Pollut. 2018 May;236:626-633. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.079.
Indoor environments provide sources of exposure to organophosphate flame retardants (PFRs), which are artificially synthesized fire-protecting agents used as additives in interior products. As public spaces, hotels are required to meet stricter fire-precaution criteria. As such, room attendants may be exposed to higher levels of PFRs. Our goal was to characterize the exposure of hotel room attendants to PFRs by measuring metabolites in their urine and the corresponding parent PFRs in dust and hand-wipes collected from 27 hotels located in Wuhan City, China. The exposure of the attendants was found to be omnipresent: urinary metabolites of PFRs, such as DPHP (diphenyl phosphate), BDCIPP (bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate), and DoCP (di-o-cresyl phosphate) & DpCP (di-p-cresyl phosphate) were detected with high frequency (87%, 79% and 87%, respectively). We observed that metabolites in post-shift urine were consistently present at higher levels than those in the first morning voids (p < 0.05 for BDCIPP and DPHP). Regarding external exposure, 10 PFRs were determined in both dust samples and hand-wipes, with TCIPP (tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate) being the most abundant compound in both matrices. The levels of PFRs in hand-wipes and dust samples were not correlated. PFRs in dust and their corresponding urinary metabolites were not significantly correlated, while a moderate significant correlation of TDCIPP (tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate) in hand-wipes and its urinary metabolite, BDCIPP, was observed in both morning void samples (p = 0.01) and post-shift urine (p = 0.002). Moreover, we found that participants from high-rise buildings (defined as > 7 stories) had significantly higher BDCIPP and DPHP concentrations than those from low-rise buildings. A possible reason is that high-rise buildings may use high-grade fireproof building materials to meet stricter fire restrictions. Overall, these results indicate that PFRs exposure in hotels is a contributor to the personal exposure of hotel room attendants.
室内环境是接触有机磷阻燃剂 (PFRs) 的来源之一,这些阻燃剂是作为添加剂添加到室内产品中的人工合成防火剂。作为公共场所,酒店需要满足更严格的防火标准。因此,客房服务员可能会接触到更高水平的 PFRs。我们的目标是通过测量来自中国武汉市 27 家酒店的灰尘和手巾擦拭物中的代谢物以及相应的母体 PFRs,来描述酒店客房服务员接触 PFRs 的情况。研究发现,客房服务员的接触是无处不在的:在尿液中检测到 PFRs 的代谢物,如 DPHP(二苯磷酸酯)、BDCIPP(双(1,3-二氯-2-丙基)磷酸酯)和 DoCP(二邻甲苯基磷酸酯)和 DpCP(二对甲苯基磷酸酯)的频率很高(分别为 87%、79%和 87%)。我们观察到,轮班后的尿液中的代谢物水平始终高于第一次晨尿(BDCIPP 和 DPHP 的 p 值均<0.05)。关于外部暴露,在灰尘样本和手巾擦拭物中均检测到 10 种 PFRs,其中 TCIPP(磷酸三(2-氯异丙基)酯)在两种基质中含量最丰富。手巾擦拭物和灰尘样本中的 PFRs 水平没有相关性。灰尘中的 PFRs 及其相应的尿液代谢物之间没有显著相关性,而在早晨和轮班后尿液中均观察到 TDCIPP(磷酸三(1,3-二氯-2-丙基)酯)与 BDCIPP 的中等显著相关性(早晨尿液 p 值=0.01,轮班后尿液 p 值=0.002)。此外,我们发现来自高层建筑(定义为>7 层)的参与者的 BDCIPP 和 DPHP 浓度明显高于来自低层建筑的参与者。一个可能的原因是,高层建筑可能使用高级防火建筑材料来满足更严格的防火限制。总的来说,这些结果表明,酒店中 PFRs 的暴露是酒店客房服务员个人暴露的一个因素。