• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate the factors influencing training transfer among nursing professionals.一份用于评估影响护理专业人员培训迁移因素的问卷的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2910-7.
2
Development and content validation of the Burden of Documentation for Nurses and Midwives (BurDoNsaM) survey.护士和助产士文件负担(BurDoNsaM)调查问卷的编制与内容验证。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1273-1281. doi: 10.1111/jan.14320. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
Family Presence During Resuscitation Benefits-Risks Scale (FPDR-BRS): Instrument Development and Psychometric Validation.复苏期间家属在场的利弊量表(FPDR - BRS):工具开发与心理测量学验证
J Emerg Nurs. 2016 May;42(3):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Registered Nurses' Perceptions of Rewarding Scale.注册护士奖励感知量表的编制与心理测量学检验。
J Nurs Res. 2019 Apr;27(2):e13. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000276.
5
Development and validation of the simulation-based learning evaluation scale.基于模拟的学习评估量表的开发与验证
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
6
Questionnaire to Measure the Participation of Nursing Professionals in Mentoring Students.测量护理专业人员参与指导学生情况的问卷。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2017 May;35(2):182-190. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v35n2a07.
7
Validity and reliability of chemical-based disinfectant use questionnaire in a sample of the Lebanese public community.基于化学消毒剂使用的调查问卷在黎巴嫩公众社区样本中的有效性和可靠性。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 18;14(10):e082268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082268.
8
Development and validation of an instrument to measure pediatric nurses' adherence to ethical codes.研制并验证一种用于测量儿科护士对伦理规范遵循程度的工具。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Feb 25;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00753-4.
9
The assessment of safe nursing care: development and psychometric evaluation.安全护理评估:开发与心理测量学评价
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Jan;25(1):22-36. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12424. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
The development and psychometric validation of an instrument to evaluate nurses' attitudes towards communication with the patient (ACO).评估护士与患者沟通态度(ACO)的工具的开发和心理测量验证。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 May;64:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability of a questionnaire assessing the knowledge, attitude, and awareness in the informal caregivers of comatose patients: An observational study.评估昏迷患者非正式照护者知识、态度和认知的问卷的效度和信度:一项观察性研究。
Curr J Neurol. 2024 Jul 5;23(3):144-151. doi: 10.18502/cjn.v23i3.17544.
2
A longitudinal assessment of factors affecting training transfer among new clinical nurse specialists.对影响新临床护理专家培训迁移的因素进行纵向评估。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Jun 10;11(3):308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.06.005. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure the congenital heart disease of children's family stressor.中文版问卷的开发与验证,用以衡量儿童先天性心脏病家庭应激源。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 1;12:1365089. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1365089. eCollection 2024.
4
The development and validation of the hospital organizational environment scale for medical staff in China.中国医务人员医院组织环境量表的编制与验证。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;11:1118337. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1118337. eCollection 2023.
5
Enhancing earthquake preparedness knowledge and practice among Nepalese immigrants residing in Japan.增强居住在日本的尼泊尔移民的地震备灾知识和实践。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 18;13(1):4468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31729-y.
6
Design and validation of a new Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for clinical decision support systems: a mixed-methods approach.设计和验证一种新的医疗保健系统可用性量表(HSUS)用于临床决策支持系统:一种混合方法。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e065323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065323.
7
Food safety knowledge and practice of abattoir and butcher shop workers: a health risk management perspective.从健康风险管理角度看屠宰场和肉店工人的食品安全知识与实践
One Health Outlook. 2022 Aug 28;4(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s42522-022-00070-1.
8
Statistical Methods for Item Reduction in a Representative Lifestyle Questionnaire: Pilot Questionnaire Study.代表性生活方式问卷中项目简化的统计方法:预调查问卷研究
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Mar 18;11(1):e28692. doi: 10.2196/28692.
9
Current Awareness of Health Professionals on the Safety of Herbal Medicine and Associated Factors in the South West of Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部卫生专业人员对草药安全性及相关因素的当前认知
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jul 27;14:2001-2008. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S321765. eCollection 2021.
10
Antimicrobial Resistance, Pharmacists, and Appreciative Inquiry: Development of a Novel Measurement Tool.抗菌药物耐药性、药剂师与 appreciative inquiry:一种新型测量工具的开发。 (注:“appreciative inquiry”直译为“积极探究”,这里保留英文未翻译,因为它可能是一个特定的专业术语或概念,在医学领域可能有特定含义,直接用英文更准确。)
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Nov 11;9(11):798. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110798.

本文引用的文献

1
On exploratory factor analysis: a review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use.探索性因子分析:近期证据回顾、当前实践评估以及未来使用建议。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Mar;51(3):511-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
2
Cost-effectiveness of essential newborn care training in urban first-level facilities.基本新生儿保健培训在城市一级医疗机构中的成本效益。
Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(5):e1176-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2158. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
3
Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.面向新世纪的卫生专业人员:变革教育,以加强相互依存世界中的卫生系统。
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
4
The qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
5
Mixing qualitative and quantitative research in developmental science: uses and methodological choices.发展科学中定性研究与定量研究的结合:用途及方法选择
Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):344-54. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.344.
6
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
7
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
8
Use of factor analysis in Journal of Advanced Nursing: literature review.《高级护理杂志》中因子分析的应用:文献综述
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Aug;55(3):330-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03915.x.
9
Continuing education for nurses: a necessity or a nicety?护士的继续教育:是必需品还是奢侈品?
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;36(5):229-33. doi: 10.3928/0022-0124-20050901-10.
10
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.

一份用于评估影响护理专业人员培训迁移因素的问卷的开发与验证

Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate the factors influencing training transfer among nursing professionals.

作者信息

Bai Yangjing, Li Jiping, Bai Yangjuan, Ma Weiguang, Yang Xiangyu, Ma Fang

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2910-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-2910-7
PMID:29433487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5809848/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most organizations invest in people for training to improve human capital and maximize profitability. Yet it is reported in industry and nursing as well that training effectiveness is constrained because of inadequate transfer of training and the underlying reasons for the transfer problem remain unknown. And there is lack of tool to measure transfer problem.

METHODS

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate the scores of factors influencing training transfer (FITT) among nursing professionals. The questionnaire was developed by item generation through interview with nurses and literature review. The FITT was validated in terms of content validity through expert reviews. Psychometric properties of the final instrument were assessed in a sample of 960 nurses with training experiences.

RESULTS

The content validity of the instrument were as follows: the IR was 0.8095. 51 items on the 63-item scale had I-CVIs of 1.0 and the remaining 12 items had I-CVIs of 0.88. The S-CVI/UA was 0.976 and the S-CVI/Ave was 0.977. For the exploratory step, principal axis factoring (PAF) was selected for this study. Parallel analysis was used to decide the number of factors to extract and oblimin rotation method was used. Exploratory factor analysis identified a five-factor solution including 53 items, accounting for 68.23% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis showed some support for this five-factor model. The findings demonstrate high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .965).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the FITT is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the factors influencing training transfer among nursing professionals. The FITT can be used to assess individual perceptions of catalysts and barriers to the transfer of training among nursing professionals, which can help promote training transfer and training effectiveness in the workplace.

摘要

背景

大多数组织对人员进行培训投资,以提高人力资本并实现利润最大化。然而,行业和护理领域也有报道称,由于培训转化不足,培训效果受到限制,而转化问题的根本原因仍不明确。并且缺乏衡量转化问题的工具。

方法

本研究的目的是开发并验证一份问卷,以评估护理专业人员中影响培训转化的因素得分(FITT)。该问卷通过与护士访谈生成条目并进行文献综述来开发。通过专家评审在内容效度方面对FITT进行验证。在960名有培训经历的护士样本中评估最终工具的心理测量特性。

结果

该工具的内容效度如下:IR为0.8095。63项量表中的51项I-CVI为1.0,其余12项I-CVI为0.88。S-CVI/UA为0.976,S-CVI/Ave为0.977。在探索性步骤中,本研究选择主成分因子分析(PAF)。使用平行分析来确定要提取的因子数量,并使用斜交旋转法。探索性因子分析确定了一个包含53个条目的五因子解决方案,占总方差的68.23%。验证性因子分析对这个五因子模型提供了一些支持。研究结果显示出高内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数=0.965)。

结论

本研究表明,FITT是评估护理专业人员培训转化影响因素的有效且可靠的工具。FITT可用于评估护理专业人员对培训转化的促进因素和障碍的个人认知,这有助于促进工作场所的培训转化和培训效果。