Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e065323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065323.
To develop and validate a questionnaire to assess the usability of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and to assist in the early identification of usability issues that may impact patient safety and quality of care.
Mixed research methods were used to develop and validate the questionnaire. The qualitative study involved scale item development, content and face validity. Pilot testing established construct validity using factor analysis and facilitated estimates for reliability and internal consistency using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
Two hospitals within a single National Health Service Trust.
We recruited a panel of 7 experts in usability and questionnaire writing for health purposes to test content validity; 10 participants to assess face validity and 78 participants for the pilot testing. To be eligible for this last phase, participants needed to be health professionals with at least 3 months experience using the local hospital electronic patient record system.
Feedback from the face and content validity phases contributed to the development and improvement of scale items. The final Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) proved quick to complete, easy to understand and was mostly worded by potential users. Exploratory analysis revealed four factors related to patient safety, task execution, alerts or recommendations accuracy, the effects of the system on workflow and ease of system use. These separate into four subscales: patient safety and decision effectiveness (seven items), workflow integration (six items), work effectiveness (five items) and user control (four items). These factors affect the quality of care and clinician's ability to make informed and timely decisions when using CDSS. The HSUS has a very good reliability with global Cronbach's alpha 0.914 and between 0.702 and 0.926 for the four subscales.
The HSUS is a valid and reliable tool for usability testing of CDSS and early identification of usability issues that may cause medical adverse events.
开发和验证一种评估临床决策支持系统(CDSS)可用性的问卷,并协助早期识别可能影响患者安全和医疗质量的可用性问题。
混合研究方法用于开发和验证问卷。定性研究包括量表项目开发、内容和表面有效性。使用因子分析进行试点测试,建立了结构有效性,并使用 Cronbach's alpha 系数促进了可靠性和内部一致性的估计。
单个国家卫生服务信托内的两家医院。
我们招募了 7 名可用性和健康目的问卷写作方面的专家组成小组,以测试内容有效性;招募了 10 名参与者以评估表面有效性,招募了 78 名参与者进行试点测试。要符合最后一个阶段的条件,参与者需要是具有至少 3 个月使用当地医院电子病历系统经验的医疗保健专业人员。
来自表面和内容有效性阶段的反馈有助于量表项目的开发和改进。最终的医疗保健系统可用性量表(HSUS)证明完成速度快、易于理解,并且主要由潜在用户措辞。探索性分析揭示了与患者安全、任务执行、警报或建议准确性、系统对工作流程的影响以及系统易用性相关的四个因素。这些因素分为四个子量表:患者安全和决策效果(七个项目)、工作流程集成(六个项目)、工作效果(五个项目)和用户控制(四个项目)。这些因素影响医疗质量和临床医生在使用 CDSS 时做出明智和及时决策的能力。HSUS 的总体 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.914,四个子量表的 Cronbach's alpha 分别为 0.702 至 0.926,具有非常好的可靠性。
HSUS 是一种用于测试 CDSS 可用性和早期识别可能导致医疗不良事件的可用性问题的有效且可靠的工具。