• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

朝着临床细菌学中微生物生长的自动化检测、半定量和鉴定迈进:概念验证。

Towards automated detection, semi-quantification and identification of microbial growth in clinical bacteriology: A proof of concept.

机构信息

Institute of Microbiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Becton Dickinson Kiestra, Le Pont-de-Claix, France.

出版信息

Biomed J. 2017 Dec;40(6):317-328. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.bj.2017.09.001
PMID:29433835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6138813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Automation in microbiology laboratories impacts management, workflow, productivity and quality. Further improvements will be driven by the development of intelligent image analysis allowing automated detection of microbial growth, release of sterile samples, identification and quantification of bacterial colonies and reading of AST disk diffusion assays. We investigated the potential benefit of intelligent imaging analysis by developing algorithms allowing automated detection, semi-quantification and identification of bacterial colonies.

METHODS

Defined monomicrobial and clinical urine samples were inoculated by the BD Kiestra™ InoqulA™ BT module. Image acquisition of plates was performed with the BD Kiestra™ ImagA BT digital imaging module using the BD Kiestra™ Optis™ imaging software. The algorithms were developed and trained using defined data sets and their performance evaluated on both defined and clinical samples.

RESULTS

The detection algorithms exhibited 97.1% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity for microbial growth detection. Moreover, quantification accuracy of 80.2% and of 98.6% when accepting a 1 log tolerance was obtained with both defined monomicrobial and clinical urine samples, despite the presence of multiple species in the clinical samples. Automated identification accuracy of microbial colonies growing on chromogenic agar from defined isolates or clinical urine samples ranged from 98.3% to 99.7%, depending on the bacterial species tested.

CONCLUSION

The development of intelligent algorithm represents a major innovation that has the potential to significantly increase laboratory quality and productivity while reducing turn-around-times. Further development and validation with larger numbers of defined and clinical samples should be performed before transferring intelligent imaging analysis into diagnostic laboratories.

摘要

背景

微生物学实验室的自动化对管理、工作流程、生产力和质量产生影响。智能图像分析的发展将进一步推动这一进程,实现微生物生长的自动检测、无菌样本的释放、细菌菌落的自动识别和定量以及 AST 药敏纸片扩散试验的读取。我们通过开发允许自动检测、半定量和细菌菌落识别的算法,研究了智能成像分析的潜在益处。

方法

通过 BD Kiestra™InoqulA™BT 模块对定义的单微生物和临床尿液样本进行接种。使用 BD Kiestra™ImagA BT 数字成像模块对平板进行图像采集,使用 BD Kiestra™Optis™成像软件。使用定义的数据集开发和训练算法,并在定义的和临床样本上评估其性能。

结果

微生物生长检测的检测算法表现出 97.1%的灵敏度和 93.6%的特异性。此外,对于定义的单微生物和临床尿液样本,即使在临床样本中存在多种微生物,也可以获得 80.2%和接受 1 个对数容差时 98.6%的定量准确性。从定义的分离物或临床尿液样本在显色琼脂上生长的微生物菌落的自动识别准确率为 98.3%至 99.7%,具体取决于测试的细菌种类。

结论

智能算法的开发是一项重大创新,具有显著提高实验室质量和生产力、同时缩短周转时间的潜力。在将智能成像分析转移到诊断实验室之前,应该使用更多的定义和临床样本进行进一步的开发和验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/51c633e74e0d/figs6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/bb22cd467067/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/2d652c42507b/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/7ae9206f9b83/figs2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/aef0030a8c02/figs3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/f72a32559034/figs4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/ca8f3273277d/figs5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/51c633e74e0d/figs6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/bb22cd467067/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/2d652c42507b/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/7ae9206f9b83/figs2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/aef0030a8c02/figs3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/f72a32559034/figs4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/ca8f3273277d/figs5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/334c/6138813/51c633e74e0d/figs6.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards automated detection, semi-quantification and identification of microbial growth in clinical bacteriology: A proof of concept.朝着临床细菌学中微生物生长的自动化检测、半定量和鉴定迈进:概念验证。
Biomed J. 2017 Dec;40(6):317-328. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
2
Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence for bacterial growth monitoring in clinical bacteriology.开发和评估用于临床细菌学中细菌生长监测的人工智能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 May 8;62(5):e0165123. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01651-23. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Does bacteriology laboratory automation reduce time to results and increase quality management?细菌学实验室自动化是否能缩短检测结果报告时间并提高质量管理水平?
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Mar;22(3):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.037. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
4
Comparison of Inoculation with the InoqulA and WASP Automated Systems with Manual Inoculation.InoqulA和WASP自动系统接种与手动接种的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2298-307. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03076-14. Epub 2015 May 13.
5
Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose?临床细菌学中的实验室自动化:应选择哪种系统?
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Mar;22(3):217-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09.030. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
Automated preparation for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing: evaluation of a research use only prototype, the BD Kiestra IdentifA/SusceptA system.用于鉴定和抗菌药敏试验的自动化制备:仅用于研究的原型BD Kiestra IdentifA/SusceptA系统的评估
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jul 25. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.007.
7
Performance evaluation of the Becton Dickinson Kiestra™ IdentifA/SusceptA.贝克顿·迪金森 Kiestra™ IdentifA/SusceptA 性能评估。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Aug;27(8):1167.e9-1167.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.050. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
8
[Evaluation of an automated streaking system of urine samples for urine cultures].[用于尿培养的尿液样本自动划线系统的评估]
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2014 Dec;31(6):670-5. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182014000600005.
9
Automated Scoring of Chromogenic Media for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Use of WASPLab Image Analysis Software.使用WASPLab图像分析软件对用于检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的显色培养基进行自动评分
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):620-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02778-15. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
10
Implementation of the WASPLab™ and first year achievements within a university hospital.WASPLab™ 的实施及在一所大学附属医院的首年成果。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;39(8):1527-1534. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03872-1. Epub 2020 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Laboratory Automation on the Time to Urine Microbiological Results: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.实验室自动化对尿液微生物学检测结果报告时间的影响:一项为期五年的回顾性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 29;14(13):1392. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131392.
2
Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence for bacterial growth monitoring in clinical bacteriology.开发和评估用于临床细菌学中细菌生长监测的人工智能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 May 8;62(5):e0165123. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01651-23. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Machine learning algorithms in microbial classification: a comparative analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Fully automated disc diffusion for rapid antibiotic susceptibility test results: a proof-of-principle study.用于快速获得抗生素敏感性试验结果的全自动纸片扩散法:一项原理验证研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jun 1;72(6):1659-1668. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx026.
2
Automatic Digital Analysis of Chromogenic Media for Vancomycin-Resistant-Enterococcus Screens Using Copan WASPLab.使用科盼WASPLab对用于耐万古霉素肠球菌筛查的显色培养基进行自动数字分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Oct;54(10):2464-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01040-16. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose?
微生物分类中的机器学习算法:一项比较分析。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Oct 19;6:1200994. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1200994. eCollection 2023.
4
Rapid and automated screening of carbapenemase- and ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria from rectal swabs using chromogenic agar media and the ScanStation device.使用显色琼脂培养基和ScanStation设备从直肠拭子中快速自动筛查产碳青霉烯酶和超广谱β-内酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性菌。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Sep 29;11(5):e0272323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02723-23.
5
Laboratory automation, informatics, and artificial intelligence: current and future perspectives in clinical microbiology.实验室自动化、信息学和人工智能:临床微生物学的当前和未来展望。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jun 27;13:1188684. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1188684. eCollection 2023.
6
Rapid, Low-Complexity, Simultaneous Bacterial Group Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Performed Directly on Positive Blood Culture Bottles Using Chromogenic Agar.采用显色琼脂直接对阳性血培养瓶进行快速、低复杂度、同时的细菌群鉴定和药敏试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Nov 14;107(6):1302-1307. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0278. Print 2022 Dec 14.
7
Molecular epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis in Northern Ghana identifies several uncharacterized bovine spoligotypes and suggests possible zoonotic transmission.加纳北部牛型结核分枝杆菌的分子流行病学研究鉴定出几种未鉴定的牛分枝杆菌 spoligotypes,并提示可能存在人畜共患传播。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Aug 11;16(8):e0010649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010649. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
State-of-the-Art Techniques for Diagnosis of Medical Parasites and Arthropods.医学寄生虫和节肢动物诊断的最新技术
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 26;11(9):1545. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091545.
9
Benefits Derived from Full Laboratory Automation in Microbiology: a Tale of Four Laboratories.从微生物全实验室自动化中获得的益处:四个实验室的故事。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;59(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01969-20.
10
Digitalization, clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.数字化、临床微生物学与传染病
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Oct;26(10):1289-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
临床细菌学中的实验室自动化:应选择哪种系统?
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Mar;22(3):217-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09.030. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
4
Automated Scoring of Chromogenic Media for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Use of WASPLab Image Analysis Software.使用WASPLab图像分析软件对用于检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的显色培养基进行自动评分
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):620-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02778-15. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
5
Automation in bacteriology: a changing way to perform clinical diagnosis in infectious diseases.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Mar;22(3):215-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.12.011. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
6
Does bacteriology laboratory automation reduce time to results and increase quality management?细菌学实验室自动化是否能缩短检测结果报告时间并提高质量管理水平?
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Mar;22(3):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.037. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
Comparison of Inoculation with the InoqulA and WASP Automated Systems with Manual Inoculation.InoqulA和WASP自动系统接种与手动接种的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2298-307. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03076-14. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
Performance of Kiestra total laboratory automation combined with MS in clinical microbiology practice.Kiestra全实验室自动化与质谱联用在临床微生物学实践中的性能表现
Ann Lab Med. 2014 Mar;34(2):111-7. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.2.111. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
9
Automated versus manual sample inoculations in routine clinical microbiology: a performance evaluation of the fully automated InoqulA instrument.常规临床微生物学中自动接种与手动接种样本的比较:全自动InoqulA仪器的性能评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):796-802. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02341-13. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
10
Automation in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学中的自动化。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1658-65. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00301-13. Epub 2013 Mar 20.