Suppr超能文献

评估激光多普勒血流仪作为组织血流测量方法的效果。

Evaluation of laser-Doppler flowmetry as a measure of tissue blood flow.

作者信息

Smits G J, Roman R J, Lombard J H

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Aug;61(2):666-72. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.61.2.666.

Abstract

In this study the technique of laser-Doppler flowmetry was evaluated for the measurement of tissue blood flow by comparing laser-Doppler flow (LDF) signal in the renal cortex, gracilis muscle, and cremaster muscle of anesthetized rats to whole-organ blood flow measured with an electromagnetic flowmeter or radioactive microspheres. In vitro, LDF signal was closely correlated (r = 0.99) to changes in erythrocyte velocity generated with a rotating wheel. Although individual LDF readings varied in situ, mean LDF signal calculated from multiple readings on the tissue surface were significantly correlated (r = 0.74-0.95) with tissue blood flows measured at various perfusion pressures. However, significant differences in the slope of the LDF signal vs. blood flow relationship were observed in different tissues and with different methods of measurement in the same tissue. This study indicates that mean laser-Doppler flow signal provides a good estimate of tissue blood flow, provided a sufficient number of points is scanned. However, there appears to be no universal calibration factor for the method.

摘要

在本研究中,通过将麻醉大鼠肾皮质、股薄肌和提睾肌中的激光多普勒血流(LDF)信号与用电磁流量计或放射性微球测量的全器官血流进行比较,对激光多普勒血流测量技术用于测量组织血流进行了评估。在体外,LDF信号与用旋转轮产生的红细胞速度变化密切相关(r = 0.99)。尽管个体LDF读数在原位有所变化,但从组织表面多次读数计算出的平均LDF信号与在不同灌注压力下测量的组织血流显著相关(r = 0.74 - 0.95)。然而,在不同组织以及同一组织中不同测量方法下,观察到LDF信号与血流关系曲线的斜率存在显著差异。本研究表明,只要扫描足够数量的点,平均激光多普勒血流信号就能很好地估计组织血流。然而,该方法似乎没有通用的校准因子。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验