Suppr超能文献

使用糖尿病接受量表测量糖尿病患者的心理调整。

Measurement of psychological adjustment to diabetes with the diabetes acceptance scale.

机构信息

Research Institute of the Diabetes Academy Mergentheim (FIDAM), Johann-Hammer-Str. 24, 97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany; Diabetes Center Mergentheim (DZM), Theodor-Klotzbuecher-Str. 12, 97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Muenchen, Neuherberg, Germany.

Research Institute of the Diabetes Academy Mergentheim (FIDAM), Johann-Hammer-Str. 24, 97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany; Diabetes Center Mergentheim (DZM), Theodor-Klotzbuecher-Str. 12, 97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Muenchen, Neuherberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2018 Apr;32(4):384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

AIMS

To develop a psychometric measure of diabetes acceptance.

METHODS

An item pool was developed and pilot-tested using a sample of 220 people with diabetes; item selection resulted in the 20-item 'Diabetes Acceptance Scale (DAS)'. 606 people with diabetes were then cross-sectionally assessed with the DAS to evaluate its reliability, validity and clinical utility; concurrent measurements included diabetes-related coping (FQCI), diabetes distress (PAID-5), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), quality of life (EQ-5D), self-management (DSMQ), glycaemic control (HbA) and complications.

RESULTS

Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α = 0.96). Factorial and criterion-related results supported validity. Higher diabetes acceptance scores correlated with more functional coping styles, lower distress and depression levels, higher treatment adherence, better glycaemic control and better quality of life (all P < .001). Persons with low diabetes acceptance (22% of the sample) were four times more likely to have HbA values over 9.0% (75 mmol/mol), two times more likely to be diagnosed with long-term complications and each over two times more likely to have had episodes of severe hypoglycaemia and ketoacidosis in the past year; the prevalence of major depression in this group was fivefold increased (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The DAS is a reliable and valid tool to measure diabetes acceptance. It may help identify patients with significant problems of accepting diabetes, a putative high-risk group in need of tailored care and support.

摘要

目的

开发一种糖尿病接受度的心理测量工具。

方法

使用 220 名糖尿病患者的样本开发并进行了初步测试,形成一个项目池;通过项目选择,产生了包含 20 个项目的“糖尿病接受量表(DAS)”。然后,对 606 名糖尿病患者进行横断面评估,以评估其信度、效度和临床实用性;同时测量包括与糖尿病相关的应对方式(FQCI)、糖尿病困扰(PAID-5)、抑郁症状(PHQ-9)、生活质量(EQ-5D)、自我管理(DSMQ)、血糖控制(HbA)和并发症。

结果

内部信度很高(Cronbach's α=0.96)。因子和标准相关结果支持其有效性。更高的糖尿病接受度评分与更功能性的应对方式、更低的困扰和抑郁水平、更高的治疗依从性、更好的血糖控制和更好的生活质量相关(均 P<0.001)。糖尿病接受度低的患者(样本的 22%)HbA 值超过 9.0%(75mmol/mol)的可能性高出四倍,被诊断为长期并发症的可能性高出两倍,过去一年中严重低血糖和酮症酸中毒发作的可能性高出两倍以上(均 P<0.05);该组患者中重度抑郁症的患病率增加了五倍(均 P<0.05)。

结论

DAS 是一种可靠且有效的测量糖尿病接受度的工具。它可以帮助识别出对糖尿病接受度存在显著问题的患者,这些患者可能是需要个性化护理和支持的高风险群体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验