Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者简短疾病认知问卷马来语版本的效度和信度

Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the brief illness perception questionnaire for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Chew Boon-How, Vos Rimke C, Heijmans Monique, Shariff-Ghazali Sazlina, Fernandez Aaron, Rutten Guy E H M

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Huispost Str.6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 3;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0394-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Illness perceptions involve the personal beliefs that patients have about their illness and may influence health behaviours considerably. Since an instrument to measure these perceptions for Malay population in Malaysia is lacking, we translated and examined the psychometric properties of the Malay version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (MBIPQ) in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The MBIPQ has nine items, all use a 0-10 response scale, except the ninth item about causal factors, which is an open-ended item. A standard procedure was used to translate and adapt the English BIPQ into Malay language. Construct validity was examined comparing item scores and scores on the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale, the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-brief, the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale, HbA1c and the presence of complications. In addition, 2-week and 4-week test-retest reliability were studied.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients completed the MBIPQ. Out of this, 97 and 215 patients completed the 2- or 4-weeks test-retest reliability questionnaire, respectively. Moderate inter-items correlations were observed between illness perception dimensions (r = -0.31 to 0.53). MBIPQ items showed the expected correlations with self-efficacy (r = 0.35), medication adherence (r = 0.29), quality of life (r = -0.17 to 0.31) and depressive symptoms (r = -0.18 to 0.21). People with severe diabetes-related distress also were more concern (t-test = 4.01, p < 0.001) and experienced lower personal control (t-test = 2.07, p = 0.031). People with any diabetes-related complication perceived the consequences as more serious (t-test = 2.04, p = 0.044). The 2-week and 4-week test-retest reliabilities varied between ICC 0.39 to 0.70 and 0.58 to 0.78, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of items in the MBIPQ are moderate. The MBIPQ showed good cross-cultural validity and moderate construct validity. Test-retest reliability was moderate. Despite the moderate psychometric properties, the MBIPQ may be useful in clinical practice as it is a useful instrument to elicit and communicate on patient's personal thoughts and feelings. Future research is needed to establish its responsiveness and predictive validity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02730754 registered on March 29, 2016; NCT02730078 registered on March 29, 2016.

摘要

背景

疾病认知涉及患者对自身疾病的个人信念,可能会对健康行为产生相当大的影响。由于缺乏用于测量马来西亚马来人群这些认知的工具,我们对成人2型糖尿病患者的马来语版简明疾病认知问卷(MBIPQ)进行了翻译并检验其心理测量特性。

方法

MBIPQ有九个项目,除了关于因果因素的第九项为开放式项目外,其余均采用0至10分的回答量表。采用标准程序将英文BIPQ翻译成马来语并进行改编。通过比较项目得分与糖尿病管理自我效能量表、Morisky药物依从性量表、世界卫生组织生活质量简表、9项患者健康问卷、17项糖尿病痛苦量表、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)及并发症的存在情况来检验结构效度。此外,还研究了2周和4周的重测信度。

结果

共有312名患者完成了MBIPQ。其中,分别有97名和215名患者完成了2周或4周的重测信度问卷。在疾病认知维度之间观察到中等程度的项目间相关性(r = -0.31至0.53)。MBIPQ项目与自我效能(r = 0.35)、药物依从性(r = 0.29)、生活质量(r = -0.17至0.31)和抑郁症状(r = -0.18至0.21)呈现出预期的相关性。患有严重糖尿病相关痛苦的人也更担忧(t检验 = 4.01,p < 0.001)且个人控制感较低(t检验 = 2.07,p = 0.031)。患有任何糖尿病相关并发症的人认为后果更严重(t检验 = 2.04,p = 0.044)。2周和4周的重测信度分别在组内相关系数(ICC)0.39至0.70和0.58至0.78之间变化。

结论

MBIPQ项目的心理测量特性中等。MBIPQ显示出良好的跨文化效度和中等的结构效度。重测信度中等。尽管心理测量特性中等,但MBIPQ在临床实践中可能有用,因为它是一种用于引出并交流患者个人想法和感受的有用工具。未来需要开展研究以确定其反应度和预测效度。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02730754于2016年3月29日注册;NCT02730078于2016年3月29日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf3/5543429/ff506e49d878/12874_2017_394_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验