社论观点：整合探索性和竞争确证性方法来检验人与环境的相互作用。
Editorial Perspective: Integrating exploratory and competitive-confirmatory approaches to testing person × environment interactions.
机构信息
University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
出版信息
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;59(3):296-298. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12824.
Students of child development and of psychopathology have long been interested in how person characteristics (e.g. genotype, temperament) might moderate the effect of environmental exposures (e.g. harsh parenting, negative life events) on development. Historically, most such research on person × environment interaction has been guided by diathesis-stress thinking, which stipulates that some individuals, due to their personal characteristics, are more susceptible to the adverse effects of contextual risk than are others (but do not function differently under supportive or even benign conditions).
儿童发展和精神病理学的学生长期以来一直关注个性特征（例如，基因型、气质）如何调节环境暴露（例如，严厉的育儿方式、负面生活事件）对发展的影响。从历史上看，大多数关于人与环境相互作用的此类研究都是由素质-应激思维指导的，该思维规定，由于个人特征，一些人比其他人更容易受到环境风险的不利影响（但在支持性甚至良性条件下的功能不同）。
Zotero 插件