Suppr超能文献

循证治疗政策改革的意外后果:实施是目标还是实现更高质量护理的策略?

Unintended Consequences of Evidence-Based Treatment Policy Reform: Is Implementation the Goal or the Strategy for Higher Quality Care?

作者信息

Park Alayna L, Tsai Katherine H, Guan Karen, Chorpita Bruce F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Five Acres - The Boys' and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jul;45(4):649-660. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0853-2.

Abstract

This study examined patterns of evidence-based treatment (EBT) delivery following a county-wide EBT reform initiative. Data were gathered from 60 youth and their 21 providers, who were instructed to deliver therapy as they normally would under the EBT initiative. Results showed limited applicability of county-supported EBTs to this service sample, and that most youth did not receive traditional delivery of EBTs. Findings suggest that it may be unrealistic to expect providers to deliver EBTs with fidelity with all clients, and that EBT implementation may be best thought of as a strategy for improving mental health services rather than a goal.

摘要

本研究考察了一项全县范围的循证治疗(EBT)改革倡议实施后的循证治疗提供模式。数据收集自60名青少年及其21名提供者,他们被要求按照在EBT倡议下的常规方式提供治疗。结果显示,县支持的EBTs对该服务样本的适用性有限,且大多数青少年未接受传统的EBTs治疗。研究结果表明,期望提供者对所有客户都忠实地提供EBTs可能不现实,并且EBT的实施最好被视为改善心理健康服务的一种策略而非目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验